Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/GNOME Games Collection

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Open-source video game#Greater organization. (non-admin closure) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 21:02, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

GNOME Games Collection

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable compilation of puzzle video games. None of the sources cited in the article are reliable sources sufficient to meet WP:GNG and BEFORE searches do not return any further sources that could be used to support the article. DocFreeman24 (talk) 02:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. DocFreeman24 (talk) 02:29, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If the article is accurate this appears to be a standard inclusion for the GNOME operating system so maybe a redirect to that article could work since there is a small section about the included games.--67.70.101.198 (talk) 17:35, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to ~~Jakks Pacific § Plug It In & Play TV Games~~ Open-source video game § Greater organization, where it is mentioned. No need for merger, as there is nothing sourced to merge. czar 21:53, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Czar:, sorry, I don't follow this. Where on that page is this collection mentioned? I don't follow the rationale for a redirect there? DocFreeman24 (talk) 01:28, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, clipboard malfunction :) Updated target czar 05:05, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that makes more sense, thanks! :) DocFreeman24 (talk) 12:38, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 02:10, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect per czar. Nothing left to merge. Axem Titanium (talk) 07:52, 30 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.