Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francisca Susano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:37, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Francisca Susano

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable longevity claimant DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 01:18, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 01:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All coverage of Susano centres around her being 199+. IMHO this (not dying/being a supercentenarian) is "one event" and so the article should be deleted per WP:BLP1E. I would suggest a redirect to Longevity myths, but Susano doesn't yet meet the 130+ requirement to be listed in Modern Extreme Longevity Claims. Samsmachado (talk) 01:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete longevity claims are common, but only rarely well sourced, this one is not.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:30, 4 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. While there are sources coming from Philippine news outlets like CNN Philippines, Philippine Daily Inquirer, ABS-CBN News, SunStar and Manila Bulletin, it does not establish the claim as the Gerontology Research Group is still verifying this since 2016. — Emperork 🐋🐰 00:41, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Barely found anything about her aside from being one of the country's oldest persons, an indication of WP:BLP1E. ASTIG😎 _{(ICE T • ICE CUBE)} 10:00, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.