Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Earther (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 03:43, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Earther (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
First off, i'm going to find myself a exceptionally large whale to whack myself with, for closing the last XfD. I realised I made a mistake, and the lack of notability still stands. MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2019 (UTC)
- Strong Keep There is evidence of notability. It is covered by notable media outlets such as Fast Company and the Columbia Journalism Review. The lorax (talk) 04:59, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Merge to Gizmodo, if not already included there. The main url www.earther.com currently points to a subdomain of Gizmodo, which handily matches my merge !vote: earther.gizmodo.com. It is clearly a sub-project of Gizmodo, and that is where it also belongs on wiki. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 21:06, 9 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:50, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:23, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 13:23, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
WeakKeep. There's RS coverage in at least three sources (Fast Company, Columbia Journalism Review, and SAPO), and The Smithsonian Magazine covers stories Earther reports on, as seen here and here. --Kbabej (talk) 17:12, 16 November 2019 (UTC)
- Please note I have updated my !vote with strikethrough. Thank you. --Kbabej (talk) 18:24, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- Comment, apologies everyone on duplicate websites notification above, i have added this afd to Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Environment. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:59, 17 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Sources found by Kbabej prove notability. Dream Focus 16:52, 20 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.