Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Duan Lianqin
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 00:29, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Duan Lianqin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Is this professor sufficiently notable? I don't think the article provides enough information to indicate that he is. Unless notability shown, delete. --Nlu (talk) 21:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:NOTE.--RyRy5 Got something to say? 21:09, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable, no third-party sources.--Aervanath's signature is boring 21:53, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. -- BelovedFreak 22:13, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No verifiable information related to him having made a substantial impact in his field is provided in the article. A GoogleScholar search produces a single hit [1] and a GoogleBooks search produced 3 hits [2]. Absent significant new information, fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 22:32, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete Per WP:N. TheAsianGURU (talk) 23:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.