Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominant group (petrology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. (WP:SNOW) -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:34, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dominant group (petrology)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another Dominantgroupcruft WP:SYNTH violation, none of the sources join Dominant group and the topic together. Cerejota (talk) 04:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. —202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as WP:OR by WP:SYNTH. Searching does not suggest this combination of terms is a notable topic. -- 202.124.73.100 (talk) 05:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete the whole lot of them as OSYN. Xxanthippe (talk) 06:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete. This is not a topic, it's someone using a search engine to find the phrase "dominant group" and tossing a lot of unrelated stuff into an article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 06:26, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete None of the examples given are anything more than descriptions of groups that are dominant, with no other special meaning. Mikenorton (talk) 08:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all the above. Vsmith (talk) 12:55, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 16:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Incoherent OR. Sławomir Biały (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:OR, WP:SYNTH —hike395 (talk) 20:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. WP:SNOW. OR. Glrx (talk) 22:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this is not a concept in petrology; it's just a use of the English language. LadyofShalott 04:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Disparate concepts stuck together with library paste. No topic here. Binksternet (talk) 23:11, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per AN/I thread, created for strange 'research' project Jebus989 ^✰ 14:54, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.