Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dena Thompson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Of note is that the IP !vote for delete doesn't qualify how the subject fails WP:CRIME, and just cites a section of a guideline page. The notion of the subject only being notable for one event (WP:BLP1E) has also been challenged in the discussion. Overall, though, this close is on the "weak keep" side, due to the small number of total participants after two relistings. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dena Thompson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Don't know if it's notable. Certainly doesn't seem to be known outside Uk. Checked Hindustan Times, Washington Post and Australian Herald Sun, which have no mention. Don't know what to make of it. Certainly fails WP:GEOSCOPE and seems to pass WP:DIVERSE and WP:BLP1E. Such a weird thing. True humanistic parasite. scope_creep 17:13, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

She was included in an episode of the US documentary Deadly Women, so she isn't only known in the UK ^[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alligators1974 (talk • contribs) 22 August 2014

^ http://adriangatton.net/2012/08/31/196/

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:00, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 10:01, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:CRIME.--180.172.239.231 (talk) 14:23, 24 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:41, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - There's a lot of UK-based articles that aren't known outside of the UK... doesn't mean we should get rid of them, Anyway Keep as passes GNG. –Davey2010 • (talk) 01:58, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:GNG which it covers.--BabbaQ (talk) 21:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 08:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Meets WP:GNG & WP:BASIC. WP:GEOSCOPE is part of WP:Notability (events), not WP:Notability (people), though in any case this person has received coverage in national media (BBC News, Telegraph, Mirror), not just local. Coverage spans several incidents over at least nine years so WP:BLP1E does not apply. Qwfp (talk) 11:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

[1] ttp://adriangatton.net/2012/08/31/196/

[1]