Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Peck
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 19:53, 29 June 2022 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- David Peck (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Mosquitoes Suck Tour (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a business consultant and a separate article about his speaking tour, whose claims of notability are not reliably sourced. The referencing in the BLP is entirely to the self-published websites of organizations directly associated with the claims being made, which are not support for notability, and the tour is almost entirely the same except for a couple of stray hits in suburban community hyperlocals not representing enough coverage to get it or him over WP:GNG -- and even on a ProQuest search for older sourcing that wouldn't Google properly, all I found was the exact same hyperlocals or accidental text matches for different David Pecks, with absolutely no strong coverage to repair this with. Nothing stated here is "inherently" notable enough to exempt Peck or the tour from having to have much, much better sourcing than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Canada. Bearcat (talk) 17:58, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Delete I see a number of individuals with the same name, but nothing to suggest this one is notable. Mccapra (talk) 21:32, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.