Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Client's day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:18, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Client's day

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An unofficial holiday, does not appear to be notable. Homo ergaster (talk) 09:44, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:19, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Input from a native speaker for the provided sources would be helpful, but from what I can discern, GNG is not met. Contrary to the nominaton, the unofficial part of this holiday does not seem to be a problem (e.g. List of minor secular observances contains many notable unofficial holidays). After a quick Google search, there are a few results, but fewer than a comparable "National Customer Appreciation Day". Article appears to fall under WP:MILL. While the number of sources is decent, there are some concerns with the reliability of some based on the translations I could find. Not to mention a fair deal of CE/MOS cleanup is needed to bring the article up to encyclopedic standards, however, draftifying would not be completely off the table if RS can be provided for notability. Bgv. (talk) 01:23, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.