Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christian Wierzbicki
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete --JForget 01:35, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Christian Wierzbicki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Contested prod. Non-notable actor. Highly probable that the show itself is a hoax.seresin | wasn't he just...? 06:36, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The only claim to notability is the single show The Millionaires and that hasn't aired yet. Ros0709 (talk) 08:25, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. —Littleteddy (roar!) 10:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Show seems to be a hoax - Google search returns nothing. Littleteddy (roar!) 10:14, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete per A7. There's no indication of any form of importance here at all. This is in addition to the problems of WP:V and that its probably all a hoax anyway as I checked every single Australian television website (at least the main ones of 1, 2, 7, 9, 10, etc) and came up with ZIPPO on this. -- ShinmaWa(talk) 10:51, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete, A7 Can't find the slightest bit of evidence that this show exists, and so he's got no assertion of notability. If the show is real, make him an article when it debuts at the end of this year. Hersfold (t/a/c) 12:46, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, as I cannot confirm anything from this article for lack of sources and Google results. I note, too, that the single line of this article is an assertion of notability - the subject is known for something, and the fact that he is known is a presumption of notability. Whether this is true or not is secondary to the fact that there is an assertion, so the article doesn't meet the Criteria for Speedy Deletion. UltraExactZZ Claims ~ Evidence 19:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.