Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charlotte Hallmark

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama. MBisanz ^talk 17:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Charlotte Hallmark

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been flagged for being non-notable since 2012, she no longer holds the office, and no new articles about her have emerged in recent years Yuchitown (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 16:38, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama as a appropriate target. I am not sure the community has developed consensus (under WP:NPOL) toward principal chiefs/chairs of sovereign Indian nations in the United States, but there is value in maintaining lists of chiefs/chairs of all recognized tribes. In this case, the subject was chief of the Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama from 2006 to 2014. --Enos733 (talk) 17:10, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge relevant information onto Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama. oncamera 17:19, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Echota Cherokee Tribe of Alabama. - CorbieV ^☊ ☼ 18:21, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, added several references to article. A tribal chief should be inherently notable due to the office held. GregJackP Boomer! 18:43, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect or Delete Preferably delete. The individual is not notable beyond her terms as chief. Every chief of every Nation does not have their own page nor are they listed on the page of the associated tribe.Indigenous girl (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I think more articles on the tribes should have a government section that lists their chairpersons, as they are sovereign nations. If we have articles about historical tribal leaders, the least we could do is also list contemporary leaders to reflect that tribes are modern and living entities. Most articles about the tribes are not very indepth, sadly. oncamera 20:51, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Merging the biography into the article about the state-recognized group is a totally fine compromise. Yuchitown (talk) 22:58, 23 March 2019 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.