Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Buckmore Park Kart Circuit
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:00, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Buckmore Park Kart Circuit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. Not notable. Essentially self-documented. WP:PR and WP:SPAM for company. Student7 (talk) 23:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC) Student7 (talk) 23:54, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. These look like good sources: The Sunday Times, BBC. Phil Bridger (talk) 00:13, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per the sources Phil Bridger has provided. Do we need to send the article through a WP:PR or something? Jeni (talk) 10:45, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:23, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge with Chatham, Kent, where it is: this is usually the best solution for facilities only of local notability. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The Sunday Times is not a local newspaper. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:30, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I have added the BBC and Sunday Times references. It is clear that track has been noticed nationally and the article will improve with time. --Bduke (Discussion) 00:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.