Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue Shift Inc.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. An acceptable stub, this will make. m.o.p 06:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blue Shift Inc.

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

unreferenced nn Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 11:15, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. (G·N·B·S·RS·Talk) • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:01, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - WP:VG reliable sources search turns up plenty of hits. WP:CORP states that if the article can be written as more than a WP:PERMASTUB then coverage would be sufficient. Given the sourcing I found it could hit Start class, and that would be simply with a customized Google search prior to other investigation. --Teancum (talk) 18:59, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Notability is maybe a bit borderline but since this is not a BLP, I don't think it hurts to be somewhat lenient. Teancum's custom search does show a fair amount of interesting stuff. This has potential. l'aquatique[talk] 18:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.