Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bioinformatics Building

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 18:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bioinformatics Building

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable building. It is just a normal classroom, not special. Fails WP:N Cowback23451 (talk) 20:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This building contains classrooms, offices and laboratories that support the Charlotte Research Institute and UNC Charlotte in general. I've provided reference and external links. It is a unique building. If it's a name issue then I can provide a more discriptive name for the building. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stanton49

Comment In the future, please sign your name with four tildes: ~~~~ Cowback23451 (talk) 20:40, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response to above Not every building on every college campus is notable. Generally, individual building articles should be integrated within the main article about the school, with the exception generally of perhaps the library. See WP:UNIGUIDE for more info. Cowback23451 (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question - Which is the "Bioinformatics Building"? This or this? The latter looks rather historic and probably had a different name through most of its life if that's the correct one. --Oakshade (talk) 03:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non notable building, zero indication in the article of how it might be notable. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources. Not even anything there to merge into the main article on the university. RadioFan (talk) 04:17, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails WP:GNG and WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 04:22, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.