Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ayana Sasagawa

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Uncontested. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ayana Sasagawa

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable voice actor. Has a supporting role in Negima, and that's about it. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:35, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:36, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support (having flagged the page as unreferenced recently) unless experts in this artform can put together a strong case for her retention. Dubbin^{u | t | c} 10:17, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The Japanese wiki article is turning up a lot of roles not mentioned in the article we have here. [1] It doesn't look promising given the tag but is worth a look at. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 13:18, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well they're definitely not showing prominence in anime and manga. VADB only shows 9 roles: [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:54, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the roles look to pass WP:ENT. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 17:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as by far not at all convincing for independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:23, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete she is not a notabile voice actress.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.