Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Awaken A Cappella
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to University of California, Los Angeles#Student life. Any usable content for merging may be recovered from the page history. T. Canens (talk) 02:48, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Awaken A Cappella (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Well-written article, but lacking sufficient reliable sources to establish notability criteria for musicians and ensembles or under WP:GNG. They have been mentioned in places outside the local college newspaper (such as the Boston Globe), but they are just mentions. A search for coverage brought up similar trivial mentions. tedder (talk) 00:56, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 00:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- tedder (talk) 00:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge to University of California, Los Angeles#Student life with a brief mention. It's just another among thousands of student a capella groups. Two outside sources are listed, the California Chronicle and the Boston Globe, but those articles have only trivial passing mentions of this group. --MelanieN (talk) 17:57, 17 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note This discussion was blanked by User:76.89.131.243, a WP:Single purpose account dedicated to this article; the blanking was reverted. --MelanieN (talk) 16:05, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:18, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.