Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adewale Adeleke (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus (WP:NPASR) King of 05:08, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adewale Adeleke (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite performing minor copyedits to the article and removing unreliable sources, the subject isn't notable and has not been discussed significantly in reliable sources. He fails WP:GNG, WP:ANYBIO, WP:MUSICBIO and WP:CREATIVE. The subject is the owner of a non notable record label. The author of the page claimed that the subject is a musician, yet he has not released any solo material. The article's previous AFD discussion can be assessed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adewale Adeleke.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:05, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Versace1608  Wanna Talk? 02:11, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 03:16, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tymon.r Do you have any questions? 03:47, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.