Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelina Domingues (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to List of American supercentenarians#Adelina Domingues. Consensus is that this page needs to go away, but there is a bit of disagreement on whether any content is salvageable. Thus redirecting, so that the page is gone and people can recover content if they think they can save it elsewhere. That would be at editorial discretion, then. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:26, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adelina Domingues

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Time for another AfD on this, now that there's a clearer idea of what supercentenarian articles are being kept and deleted. After the AfD there remain 3 sources, 2 of which are obituaries and 1 being the GRG table, so there's not really anything in the way of significant coverage. If deleted, the title should then redirect to List of oldest people by country and anchored to Cape Verde. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 15:24, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

But... but... but she ate beans every day! And she refused medication! And she had a son!! That's important!! Seriously: delete this cruft per WP:NOPAGE. --Randykitty (talk) 15:53, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per WP:NOPAGE and my nomination rational in the last AfD. I will only reiterate that this article was deleted once before and recreated under the false premise that being the oldest in the world automatically warrants the notability for an individual article, which it does not. Newshunter12 (talk) 18:39, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete merely living longer than others does not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete then redirect as recommended by the nominator. The coverage is trivial. There's nothing inherently notable about staving off the Grim Reaper for an especially long period of time. David in DC (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there, how are you? It's been a long time, seems like we've come a long way... The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 00:10, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect as a minibio on List of American supercentenarians. — JFG ^talk 09:31, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Merge/redirect to List of American supercentenarians#Adelina Domingues per Wikipedia:Editing policy#Try to fix problems. Merging was my second choice at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adelina Domingues (2nd nomination). I have completed the merge. The information is sourced to Los Angeles Times and Milwaukee Journal Sentinel.
Cunard (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.