Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abdul Salam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I will restore the redirect. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 16:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abdul Salam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails to provide sufficient refs for GNG Shubhi89 (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Shubhi89 (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shubhi89 (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Shubhi89 (talk) 10:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A GoogleScholar profile gives him h-index of 22, with top cited publication of 107. For an Assistant Professor, that's quite qood, but not enough yet to satify WP:PROF#C1 in a high citation discipline like communication engineering. Also, the article was expanded from a redirect by User:Hdrsalam. The same user uploaded the photo to Commons, currently used in the article, with the source specified as "own work". It is likely that we are dealing with a WP:AUTO case here. So taken together, I believe that's a 'delete'. Nsk92 (talk) 11:11, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - meets neither WP:GNG or WP:NSCHOLAR.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The Google Scholar citations are borderline, but not quite enough to convince me of WP:PROF#C1, and the autobiography issues tip me from weak delete to full delete. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia is not a platform to post ones autobiography.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:10, 27 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm concerned about the WP:COI, and want to confirm whether the original ~~dab~~ redirect page--which was erased for the autobiography--will be restored. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 15:30, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Nsk92 and David Eppstein; we should restore the redirect to Abd al- Salam (name) without keeping the COI-filled page history. XOR'easter (talk) 17:34, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure, that'd be OK. Nsk92 (talk) 17:37, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as others have said. If it wasn't for likely WP:AUTO I'd be thinking more along the lines of WP:TOOSOON. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:15, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — per rationale by Johnpacklambert + no auto can ever be written from a neutral point of view, this individual doesn’t meet the relevant SNG neither do they satisfy GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.