Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007 Florida Marlins Draft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:18, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2007 Florida Marlins Draft

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

List cruft. Many of these individuals will never be notable. I believe we've had successful AfD's for these pages before. Muboshgu (talk) 23:05, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. —Muboshgu (talk) 23:12, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as redundant info from 2007 Major League Baseball Draft. Vodello (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC) Keep per past established consensus at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2006 Seattle Mariners draft picks and cleanup with reliable sources. Vodello (talk) 16:32, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep See, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of 2006 Seattle Mariners draft picks, a similar AfD, which closed as keep. All of my keep arguments can be found there. --Brian Halvorsen (talk) 22:53, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I was thinking of that AfD (though misremembering the result). I still think it's list cruft, though yours are unquestionably better written than this one. --Muboshgu (talk) 02:11, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Since the Major League Baseball draft gets a lot of media attention, with particular attention to how individual teams did in the draft, I don't see that this list qualifies as "listcruft." Articles on baseball players and teams also frequently refer to past drafts, so the subject has enough enduring interest to qualify as encyclopedic. Meets Wikipedia criteria for stand-alone lists. BRMo (talk) 14:10, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.