User talk:Zzzzz/Archive5
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Zzzzz. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
CP
hiya, just a gentle reminder (so it doesnt get lost in archives, as so much does around here ;) that i replied to you at Wikipedia talk:Community Portal#Order of GAC and CTC with a few suggestions. Thanks :) -Quiddity 18:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
- It's going to get archived soon. Should you wish to reply (please :), or just re-read, do so soon. Thanks :) -Quiddity 18:22, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
HCOTM
We have a winner!
You showed support for the horror collaboration of the month. This month John Carpenter was selected to be improved to good article or featured article status. We hope you can contribute. |
--Fuhghettaboutit 12:27, 24 May 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:47, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
Watchmen Featured Article
I want to know if you still oppose its canidacy. I made a "themes" section based on your suggestion here.
Thank you--DCAnderson 16:34, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
- Just wanted to add that I expanded the themes section and did a copyedit and I believe DC has met with your other valid criticisms as well. In terms of there being a checklist, I believe your suggestions have been addressed. Thanks. Tombseye 19:29, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
Featured Articles
Hello Zzzzz. Thanks again for your tremendous help with getting The KLF to feaured status. The article now wears it's shiny star with pride! :-) We've set up a micro WikiProject at WP:KLF and there we have a list of the articles we're working on. We'd like to put 1 or 2 song articles to peer review to see how they fare, with the ultimate aim of FA. Perhaps if you have a spare moment you could take a look at the lists and some of the articles and see if you think any of them show FA potential yet? --kingboyk 14:36, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Poll in Wikipedia talk:Footnotes#Poll
Your request was already there. I emphasized it for you (point 6.2 in proposals). If you agree with the rest too, kindly vote, so that we get done with this! NikoSilver (T) @ (C) 10:32, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Christian Bale FAC
I've reviewed your objections and attended to what I can. Respond, please. --Antrophica 06:42, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
Night of the Living Dead
Would you mind taking a look at this revised article some time? Night of the Living Dead. Thanks. Dmoon1 04:31, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
Bobblewik's "delinking of dates" standards
User:bobblewik uses his/her own standards w.r.t. delinking of dates. These standards are not conforming to the WP:MOS (notably WP:MOSDATE), and Bobblewik has been blocked for that already several times. User:AndyZ uses Bobblewik's scripts for removing date links (see User:AndyZ/monobook.js), which is a subversion of guidelines and policies.
For recent disruption caused by Bobblewik in this sense, see the three or four last items of user talk:bobblewik. Since Bobblewik, seemingly, tries to found his/her disruptive actions on WP:WIAFA now, I remove suggestions that WP:WIAFA supports delinking of dates not supported by the MoS. --Francis Schonken 14:08, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
Got your message. Thanks for the update.
I would appreciate if you would look at [[Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Charles_Buell_Anderson]]. Thanks. Ste4k 11:54, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for taking a peek at that, I hope it wasn't too long and drawn out, and I'd like to mention that you have an excellent manner of communicating. I wish there were more people around here like yourself that would have seen that article. I'm willing to bet that the big arguments are probably what the casual AfD person skips over. This is for you:
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
Sometimes, text removal is the most effective editing. Ste4k 04:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC) |
Vandalism
I peronally want to talk to you via my email to check what happened. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 01:34, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Unblock
I rececived your email, and I unblocked you. If you want me to temp delete the vandalism in your user talk page, just let me know. Thanks Jaranda wat's sup 01:48, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
GA template
Just to let you know that I appreciate your notification, because I would have missed it otherwise since I almost never check WP:DRV. Oh and Rlevse, I can only speak for myself, but I am most certainly not a meatpuppet. I think for myself, thank you. Also, Zzzzz, here's an official opt-in note: in the future, might you become aware of any debate related to this issue and there are signs of me not being aware of it, I would appreciate a notice. Thanks, — mark ✎ 15:53, 10 July 2006 (UTC)
Mandy Moore FA nomination
Thanks for the commentary - I hope I've addressed all your concerns and changed the article appropriately. Mad Jack 18:50, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
Cheggit as AFD
I posted on the Cheggit discussion page in favor of keeping said article. I'm curious as to why you tagged it as an AFD (I'm betting you have a good reason, I'm just wondering what it is). Thanks -- Brandon 11 July 2006