User talk:Zin92

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Zin92! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! Kukin i

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Kuki ni 13:57, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wensleydale Railway

A look at Google Earth confirmed that you are right so I have tweaked the diagram. See what you think! Britmax (talk) 10:17, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tidying up of poor English

Hi, regarding this edit: you altered 4 July 2003 to July 4, 2003 with the edit summary "Tidying up of poor English". In fact, the previous form was correct English: see WP:STRONGNAT. Thanks. --Redrose64 (talk) 22:42, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 9 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the Stevie Nicks page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zin92. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

Hello, I'm 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Lauda Air Flight 004 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2600:8800:1880:91E:5604:A6FF:FE38:4B26 (talk) 01:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zin92. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fractional rig, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Boom and Spreader. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:34, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your interest/info

Hey I thought I’d just let you know that some edits you reverted recently, were the work of users under a sockpuppet investigation, and some of them have already been blocked. Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2021Porto Final. Fork99 (talk) 20:01, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. In relation to edits at Lauda Air Flight 004. Fork99 (talk) 20:12, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Zin92. Fork99 (talk) 20:48, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reverse Polish notation

That certainly was not a 'corrected' expression. --CiaPan (talk) 17:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Sorry, I'm not quite sure what you're saying - should I have said something like alternative rather than corrected? Or was it the "x" that was wrong (the "x" wasn't mine though!). I thought that the alternative expression was a better example because the brackets are required in the infix version of the expression. Thanks for putting in the correct multiple symbol. Are you happy with the latest text? Regards, Zin92 (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Soldiers of the Queen (song), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 06:23, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zing92, When you find the source then add them in along with the content but not before that as info added/changed needs to be supported by source for verification. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 06:24, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've provided references for some of the points but not all. Are you saying that it's OK to add back in text where supported by a source but not to add back in text which still isn't supported by a source?

Thanks Zin92 (talk) 06:32, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zin 92, Good day. You can add back the content that is supported by source now. As for the remaining unsourced content, you can add it "when" you have the source. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Soldiers_of_the_Queen_%28song%29&oldid=prev&diff=1245129661 "HERE" was your edit, so will be easy for you to find them when you have the source. Stay safe and best. Cassiopeia talk 07:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remuera

If you are from the UK why are you trying to guess what you think Remuera is like? Traumnovelle (talk) 21:58, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there.

Who says that I'm guessing what Remuera looks like? I may not live in Remuera but I must have visited it at least 20 times in the last 30 years (my sister lives there).

(The reason that I pointed out that I don't live in Remuera was that I didn't want anybody to think that I lived in Remuera and that this would cloud my judgement as to what sort of photo was suitable.)

I am not against replacing the current photo. However, I do feel that an image that more ties in with what Remuera looks like in general would be more appropriate. As per the lede, "[Remuera is] A prime example of a "leafy" suburb, Remuera is noted for its quiet tree-lined streets". I don't feel that your suggested replacement photo is representative of what Remuera looks like in general.

Regards Zin92 (talk) 22:06, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There could be a better image but one where the subject takes up less than 20% of the image (and it doesn't even show the entire suburb) is not a good choice per the example shown at MOS:IRELEV. The only other images on Commons are either old or just specific buildings, all of those admittedly are still an improvement over the current image. Traumnovelle (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't see why you insist on restoring an image that is only partially of the subject. Traumnovelle (talk) 06:16, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]