User talk:Zaqwsxs

Speedy deletion nomination of Drsrihari(actor)

Hello Zaqwsxs,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Drsrihari(actor) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Rollingcontributor (talk) 19:12, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Drsrihari(actor)

Please check my talk page, I have replied to you. Rollingcontributor (talk) 19:30, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please check this page: Talk:Drsrihari(actor)#Draft_namespace Rollingcontributor (talk) 19:50, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Drsrihari(actor)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Drsrihari(actor), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. bonadea contributions talk 20:09, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sreehari

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sreehari, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KungAvSand (talk) 04:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

STOP creating new articles

It has been observed that you have been creating sockpuppet accounts to create new articles about "Dr. Sreehari". Numerous pages have been created and it has been decided by the community, through a discussion, that the person in the articles is NOT notable. Also, the Guinness World Record claims have been checked and found to be false. The articles also seem to constitute unambiguous advertisement. Below is a list of links to check evidence of vandalism caused by you:

I am pretty confident you are aware of what wrongs you have done. Please STOP this disruptive behavior IMMEDIATELY. The article may now also be salted.

As a personal note, please stop wasting your time on creating articles which are duplicates of Drsrihari(actor), and try to make useful contributions to Wikipedia. Thank you. Rollingcontributor (talk) 06:46, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:18, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. bonadea contributions talk 15:22, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated use of the encyclopedia for advertising, repeated restoring articles under different titles in attempts to evade deletion, editing under multiple names (sockpuppetry), and personal attacks on editors. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DGG ( talk ) 06:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]