User talk:Yicktofry

Welcome

Hello, Yicktofry, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Rmosler2100

Happy editing! rmosler (talk) 07:52, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

August 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:66.190.87.67 has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy! [message] 23:45, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Jorge Larrionda. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy! [message] 23:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User:Iridescent. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Tommy! [message] 23:52, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:66.190.87.67, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Deleting warnings from a vandals talk page has no benefit to the vandal but does have consequences for you. Mlpearc powwow 23:57, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Im guessing that Yicktofry and 66.190.87.67 are the same person, actually, based on their edits. Yicktofry was probably just logging in to evade the previously existing block on the IP. —Soap— 00:09, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 31 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. —Soap— 00:11, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Enough

Stop with the conspiracy "bullying" nonsense and read WP:VANDALISM and come back later. Thank you Tommy! [message] 00:14, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yicktofry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

These Wiki-bullies are crazy, they're vandalizing my page and accusing me of vandalism

Decline reason:

Continued posting of obviously invalid request can lead to the revocation of your ability to edit this page and/or an extension or re-setting of the block. I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would like all the short-sighted admins who mocked my unblock request and claims of Wiki-bullying to note that Tommy2010, who started the proceedings against me and escalated them, came back to delete my entire user page as soon as I was successfully blocked. This is vandalism. Please hold this admin accountable for his abuse of administrator privileges, indiscretion, and vandalism. He is a classic Wiki-bully. Yicktofry (talk) 16:20, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As Tommy has tried to explain to you: a) he's not an admin, and b) your user page violated WP:UPNOT. Favonian (talk) 16:24, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever. He never tried to explain that he is not an admin until today. And whatever privileges he has, he's clearly not a normal user. He is a vandal regardless, it is not his privilege to delete my entire page. If you guys don't revert and mark vandalism, it's going to get fun. REALLY, REALLY fun. Yicktofry (talk) 16:30, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This being "the encyclopaedia anyone can edit", and anyone being empowered to enforce community policy, then actually - yes, it is his privilege to delete "your" entire page. See WP:UP#OWN: They are not a personal homepage, and do not belong to the user. They are part of Wikipedia, and exist to make collaboration among editors easier. And, yes, I am an admin. TFOWR 16:39, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So I'm assuming all of you are ready for some fun, then? heeeeeeeyyyo! Yicktofry (talk) 16:42, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, look, Tommy's still here. But he can't write on my user talk page because anyone can delete anything they want. It's wikipedia policy, Tommy, live with it.

"Deleting anything you want"

The deletion is fine. The edit summary ("since anyone can delete anything they want, according to a REAL admin") - not so much. I said deleting within policy was fine. In this instance your deletion is OK - it's a talkpage, you can delete comments made on your talkpage - it indicates that you've read and acknowledged them (you can delete this very comment if you want). But deleting "anything you want"? No. Not what I said, and not what you should be thinking. TFOWR 16:52, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing for attempting to harass other users. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 16:53, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! nice novice move there, go straight for the "block". Have fun ya'll! so, in middle school, were you more afraid of football players, bathrooms, or detention hall? Yicktofry (talk) 16:59, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yicktofry (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not harassing anybody, I am trying to learn how to protect myself from harassment, etc. An editor has deleted my entire page while I was blocked. That editor played a role in getting me originally blocked. That editor then deleted my entire page. I want to be able to keep my user page up to date and relevant without fearing that some other editor may just decide to destroy it.

Decline reason:

Sorry, I do not see it that way. You've used this account to evade a block, and then continued the vandalism of the IP address you were using. You then proceeded to attack and threaten anyone reverting your mistakes. Any further unblock requests that do not acknowledge this behavior and how it will change will be declined, and this page will likely be disabled. Thanks. Kuru (talk) 17:44, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

It doesn't matter, I'll use other usernames to edit when I need to. Thanks for showing how pointless all of Wikipedia's policies are because certain editors are above the rules.