User talk:Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey

This is Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuthbert Yerex (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MurielMary was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cuthbert Yerex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MurielMary (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MurielMary (talk) 08:38, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi MurielMary,

Thanks for reviewing my submission. I added the Cuthbert Yerex page via the list on the Women in Red list of red links (assuming that all the people on that list had been selected as sufficiently notable). The sources that I found for the page seemed to be all the ones that are available, unless I missed something. Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 14:36, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuthbert Yerex (October 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The decline rationale "improperly sourced" refers to the fact that most of the current references should be removed: wikidata, MyHeritage, Ancestry.com/ca, and findagrave are all user generated sources that can't be used in Wikipedia.

There is no need for two separate sources to show where Christopher Brand: Looking Forward was published.

What do the article and the book listed in the "In context" section actually say? Simply saying that she's mentioned in them (without a page number specifying where in the publication she's mentioned) isn't particularly informative. Please use the information in the Utopian Studies article, and in the dissertation, to develop the draft!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cuthbert Yerex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 16:34, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I have no idea what the two articles say, because I do not have access to JStor or ProQuest. Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 16:56, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - if you're still interested in pursuing this, you might be able to get those sources through the resource exchange here on Wikipedia. The Wikipedia Library grants access to both JSTOR and ProQuest (you're not yet eligible to sign up for the library, but many other folks here are part of it and they can get the information to you via the resource exchange). 199.208.172.35 (talk) 14:18, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I will try that. Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 14:26, 18 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Betsy Whyte moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Betsy Whyte, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 01:16, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Betsy Whyte has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Betsy Whyte. Thanks! Dan arndt (talk) 01:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Dan, could you remove or revise the "This article has multiple issues" box now? I have fixed most of the issues, especially reliance on a single source. Thanks! Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 13:52, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Betsy Whyte has been accepted

Betsy Whyte, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 22:54, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frances Elizabeth Herring (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://www.biographi.ca/en/bio/herring_frances_elizabeth_14E.html. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Frances Elizabeth Herring may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought I had fixed this issue. Could you point out any remaining text that is identical? Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey (talk) 13:01, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cuthbert Yerex (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You might have enough sources for an article on her book instead?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cuthbert Yerex and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 22:44, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cuthbert Yerex

Hello, Yaburrow-SurveyMonkey. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cuthbert Yerex".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:00, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Axelle Lenoir has been accepted

Axelle Lenoir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 20:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arianna Gleason (December 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please read carefully the requirements in WP:NPROF. She needs much more than a couple of mentions in popular science, she needs major recognition in terms of awards. None of her current awards are in that category. She will get there, but not yet and probably not for some years.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arianna Gleason and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 12:06, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

Hello. Your recent edits to List of Sikhs, List of people from Vancouver and List of Canadian Sikhs appears to have added a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 18:48, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Jasmin Kaur has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Jasmin Kaur. Thanks! scope_creep^Talk 08:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jasmin Kaur (November 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I agree with Scope Creep that "The books are notable but I don't think she is". There is not much information about Kaur, rather than her books, and this draft suffers because of it. This draft feels more like a disjointed collection of facts rather than a comprehensive article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jasmin Kaur and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 08:17, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]