User talk:Xp54321/Archive 3

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Xp54321. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

→

Questions

{{helpme}} As I assume multiple editors are watching this page;I have a few questions:

What does do?

A: It won't show an external link icon. http://www.google.ca vs http://www.google.ca

How do I change the color of text?

A:

What does <tt> mean/do?

A: Well, let's see. Apparently it puts it in monospace.

What does <blockquote></blockquote> do?

A: It places the text in a block

like this

What does <includeonly></includeonly> do?

A:include only will hide the wrapped section and only display it when the page is transcluded

What does <noinclude></noinclude> do?

A: won't display the wrapped section when transcluded

What does <code></code> do?

A: just colors the text on an off-white background to look cool

Thanks(Ahead of time)!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 02:45, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Answered a few. Blockquote as far as I know just indents a bit, but I could be wrong. –xenocidic (talk) 03:10, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I answered a couple more. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 03:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks guys! What's monospace?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Some kinda silly font apparently. –xenocidic (talk) 03:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

It looks computery.;)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

I use the blah quite a lot, it sometimes just looks neater without the external link icon. I also use the <tt></tt> feature when a member asks how to use a certain piece of wikicode i.e. how to add an image to an article. It stands out more that way ([[Image:imagename.jp]]). ——RyanLupin • (talk) 08:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: monospace: Monospace fonts are those where every letter fills the same amount of horizontal space. This is particularly useful for computer programming and other applications where specific indentation matters. Compare "Wi" with "Wi". As for the tags themselves, <tt> represents "teletype", which simply shifts into a monospace font. <code>, however, is a code emulation tag. All aspects of formatting, including line breaks and whitespace, are retained. Wikipedia's own markup, however, overrides this behavior. The analogous form to <code> is starting lines with leading spaces. — Lomn 12:55, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a thought...

Hi there, I saw your recent prod of The Wicked Son by David Mamet. I have no doubt it was in good faith, but "Um...what is this article?! But it's probably a copyvio and somewhat biased and borderline vandalism" might be considered a little WP:BITEy, remember we were all new once! --Beloved Freak 12:21, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Service Awards

Hey Xp, just though I'd bring this to your attention as I'm sure there's going to be someone who has you on their watchlist who'll moan and groan you for this but to earn the Experienced & Established Editor award, you need to have been a member for 1½ year. You've been here 4 months. Just giving you the heads up as I've seen members remove parts of your userpage before :P ——RyanLupin • (talk)

Done Awards + ribbons rmed.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 18:47, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:01C

Thank'ee for catching that. I didn't remember having taken out the timestamps at some point in time before... 21655 ^{ταλκ/01ҁ} 19:04, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

You did it before once sometime ago and your welcome.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:05, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your !vote at my RFA

Thanks!

Thank you, Xp54321, for your support !vote at my RFA. I will be doing my best to make sure that your confidence has not been misplaced. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 18:46, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome and good luck! I expect great things from you!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:52, 1 July 2008 (UTC)

AIV

About Archiving
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Okay, I was replying to a message and then you archived your talk page? I think sections on your talk page should be out for at least 4-ish days before archiving. You just archived the minute after you replied to your message. Anyway, I agreed to what Xenocidic said. I reviewed your report and some didn't vandalize after their last warning. Remember, however bad they have vandalized, it has to be after their 4th warning is when you make a report. Still-- RyRy (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Dude I'm tired. I was about to log out when I got that annoying "new messages" tab. I'll reply later. Need my afternoon nap or something.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Just a suggestion, but if you add this to the very top of your talkpage: {{User:MiszaBot/config \|algo = old(7d) \|archive = User talk:Xp54321/Archive %(counter)d \|counter = 3 \|maxarchivesize = 250K }} {{archivebox\|auto=yes}} it will automatically archive any thread that hasn't had anyone post in it for seven days to User talk:Xp54321/Archive 3 until that archive reaches 250k in size, and then automatically start archiving to Archive 4 and so on. It makes it a lot easier as you don't need to ever manually archive posts, and avoids the risk of archiving threads too early. It will also automatically add an index of links to those archives of yours which currently contain material (I can delete your currently empty archives, if you want, to stop them showing up in the index box). If you find the 7 days is too short, you can change the time (I usually keep mine set at 18 days). – ırıdescent 22:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC) I use to have that setup actually. But some user(I forgot who maybe R2) persuaded me to archive manually instead and I've been doing so ever since. I use manual archive as to get rid of sections no longer in use which makes my "scroll time" much shorter. Eh...I'm really not sure. And it didn't really seem to work last time. Persuade me some more Iri.;)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC) I'm curious to know why Huggle would be reporting users to AIV before they even have a level 4 warning? I don't think it should be doing that. Gary King (talk) 22:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC) There's a button next to "Message User" called "Report User". Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC) (ec) Xp, it's quite alright to manually archive. I just don't think brand new sections on your talk page should be archived right after you reply to them one minute later. At least wait to archive about a week after the sections have been posted, not right after you reply yo them. -- RyRy (talk) 22:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Not a case of persuading - what you do on your talkpage is down to you, and there's nothing to stop you manually archiving something early even with the bot in place. If you archive things (other than obvious templates) that are less than 24 hours old, don't be surprised if you get rude remarks for it, though; Wikipedia has users in every English speaking country in the world (and some others), and removing posts that have only been up for a few hours means that users in Singapore or Australia, for example, probably won't see them. – ırıdescent 22:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC) That's an...unusual talkpage Iri... Old text based game or something? Anyways I'll leave posts up for 72 hours(3 days) before archiving. I promise.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

About Archiving

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Okay, I was replying to a message and then you archived your talk page? I think sections on your talk page should be out for at least 4-ish days before archiving. You just archived the minute after you replied to your message. Anyway, I agreed to what Xenocidic said. I reviewed your report and some didn't vandalize after their last warning. Remember, however bad they have vandalized, it has to be after their 4th warning is when you make a report. Still-- RyRy (talk) 21:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Dude I'm tired. I was about to log out when I got that annoying "new messages" tab. I'll reply later. Need my afternoon nap or something.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Just a suggestion, but if you add this to the very top of your talkpage:

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|algo = old(7d)

|archive = User talk:Xp54321/Archive %(counter)d

|counter = 3

|maxarchivesize = 250K

}}

it will automatically archive any thread that hasn't had anyone post in it for seven days to User talk:Xp54321/Archive 3 until that archive reaches 250k in size, and then automatically start archiving to Archive 4 and so on. It makes it a lot easier as you don't need to ever manually archive posts, and avoids the risk of archiving threads too early. It will also automatically add an index of links to those archives of yours which currently contain material (I can delete your currently empty archives, if you want, to stop them showing up in the index box). If you find the 7 days is too short, you can change the time (I usually keep mine set at 18 days). – ırıdescent 22:00, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I use to have that setup actually. But some user(I forgot who maybe R2) persuaded me to archive manually instead and I've been doing so ever since. I use manual archive as to get rid of sections no longer in use which makes my "scroll time" much shorter. Eh...I'm really not sure. And it didn't really seem to work last time. Persuade me some more Iri.;)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:12, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm curious to know why Huggle would be reporting users to AIV before they even have a level 4 warning? I don't think it should be doing that. Gary King (talk) 22:19, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

There's a button next to "Message User" called "Report User". Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 22:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

(ec) Xp, it's quite alright to manually archive. I just don't think brand new sections on your talk page should be archived right after you reply to them one minute later. At least wait to archive about a week after the sections have been posted, not right after you reply yo them. -- RyRy (talk) 22:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Not a case of persuading - what you do on your talkpage is down to you, and there's nothing to stop you manually archiving something early even with the bot in place. If you archive things (other than obvious templates) that are less than 24 hours old, don't be surprised if you get rude remarks for it, though; Wikipedia has users in every English speaking country in the world (and some others), and removing posts that have only been up for a few hours means that users in Singapore or Australia, for example, probably won't see them. – ırıdescent 22:29, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

That's an...unusual talkpage Iri... Old text based game or something? Anyways I'll leave posts up for 72 hours(3 days) before archiving. I promise.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:12, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You Have Mail!

Off Topic...
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Hey Xp, You Have Mail Regarding BionicTest... in short, click here! B G 7even 16:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Already there. Please give me rights(including staff..).This is my confirmation.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Done. I've fixed the error - we're just short of CU atm! 16:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Kay, is testing of dev and over allowed?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC) No... at least not at the moment. OVR would currently violate our license, as it can only be used in legal matters with GFDL. If we remove that, then we lost compatibility with WP. Dev is only used by me when i'm making updates. No need for testing, as it's deprecated at many other wikis. B G 7even 16:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC) OK thanks for clearing that up. What about cu? You said you had an interested admin from here.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Currently, we're still searching. My admin was interested in helping look after the wiki - in fact, they already have an account with Staff Rights... B G 7even 16:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC) You mean Tbo 157? I saw him in RC. Figured it was him. Anyways we don't need Cu yet or any of the "specialist" user rights yet at the moment.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC) reset Yep. Great friend of mine. Precisely, we don't need them yet. Dev and Interwiki are taken now, they don't need noone else, and the rest can be filled by those who either don't want or can;'t have full sysop rights. I'm also thinking up some other random ones for our fun side! BTW lets take this to the wiki now, as it's very OT for WP!!! B G 7even 16:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Off Topic...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hey Xp,

You Have Mail Regarding BionicTest... in short, click here!

B G 7even 16:18, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Already there. Please give me rights(including staff..).This is my confirmation.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Done. I've fixed the error - we're just short of CU atm!

16:26, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Kay, is testing of dev and over allowed?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:32, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

No... at least not at the moment. OVR would currently violate our license, as it can only be used in legal matters with GFDL. If we remove that, then we lost compatibility with WP. Dev is only used by me when i'm making updates. No need for testing, as it's deprecated at many other wikis. B G 7even 16:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

OK thanks for clearing that up. What about cu? You said you had an interested admin from here.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:45, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Currently, we're still searching. My admin was interested in helping look after the wiki - in fact, they already have an account with Staff Rights... B G 7even 16:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

You mean Tbo 157? I saw him in RC. Figured it was him. Anyways we don't need Cu yet or any of the "specialist" user rights yet at the moment.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:54, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

reset
Yep. Great friend of mine. Precisely, we don't need them yet. Dev and Interwiki are taken now, they don't need noone else, and the rest can be filled by those who either don't want or can;'t have full sysop rights. I'm also thinking up some other random ones for our fun side! BTW lets take this to the wiki now, as it's very OT for WP!!! B G 7even 16:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wiki

Also off topic...
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Why did we move for no reason? I don't like the look of the new place, its not a wiki. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 17:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC) The link doesn't work for me!! When I click the link, it says "Done" on the bottom, but NOTHING at all shows up! Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Hang on BG7 is probably doing maintenance and clean up. We don't have an error message for that yet. And R2 scribble wiki is poor in terms of software which is why we moved. You'll find the new wiki to be far more functional than the old one.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Now we have to start from scratch. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 17:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC) That's not so bad.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC) ec Sorry guys - I crashed it during maintenance - one of the extensions is broken. Anyhoo, it's running now. I'll work on an offline placeholder. Oh, and the best part bout the new wiki - we're running MediaWiki version 1.13alpha, the same as here. B G 7even 17:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Excellent the latest version!:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Yup - I believe we are the only test wiki to do so as well - SW uses 1.10 BTW. B G 7even 17:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC) That's old right?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Yup. It's going back to about 2006 - where as 1.13alpha isn't even released yet! B G 7even 17:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Released?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC) 1.13alpha isn't available to download directly from the WMF at http://www.mediawiki.org ... however, I have a way! B G 7even 17:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC) Hacking?(joke)What?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 18:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC) reset Nope, just via svn! B G 7even 09:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Are you online? If so, pop over to BT and edit!!! B G 7even 17:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Also off topic...

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Why did we move for no reason? I don't like the look of the new place, its not a wiki. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 17:19, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

The link doesn't work for me!! When I click the link, it says "Done" on the bottom, but NOTHING at all shows up! Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:20, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hang on BG7 is probably doing maintenance and clean up. We don't have an error message for that yet. And R2 scribble wiki is poor in terms of software which is why we moved. You'll find the new wiki to be far more functional than the old one.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:23, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Now we have to start from scratch. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 17:24, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

That's not so bad.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:25, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry guys - I crashed it during maintenance - one of the extensions is broken. Anyhoo, it's running now. I'll work on an offline placeholder. Oh, and the best part bout the new wiki - we're running MediaWiki version 1.13alpha, the same as here.

B G 7even 17:27, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent the latest version!:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:30, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup - I believe we are the only test wiki to do so as well - SW uses 1.10 BTW. B G 7even 17:31, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

That's old right?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:46, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Yup. It's going back to about 2006 - where as 1.13alpha isn't even released yet! B G 7even 17:50, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Released?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

1.13alpha isn't available to download directly from the WMF at http://www.mediawiki.org ... however, I have a way! B G 7even 17:53, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Hacking?(joke)What?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 18:04, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

reset Nope, just via svn! B G 7even 09:56, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Are you online? If so, pop over to BT and edit!!! B G 7even 17:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Replied

Non-Wikipedia Thing
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. I replied on your bionic talk page. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 05:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Non-Wikipedia Thing

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I replied on your bionic talk page. — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 05:09, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Reverts review

Huggle
I went through all your reverts in your last 250 article edits (which were mostly reverts, so I looked at quite a lot of reverts). I found this, in which you didn't completely remove the vandalism. There was also this in which you just fixed spacing. This edit didn't remove vandalism (but you fixed it with your next edit). Your edit summary here wasn't the best. So it appears that there were 4 edits in the last 250 that could have been better. Useight (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Generally speaking you have improved significantly in recent weeks. :-) — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 08:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Well thank you 4/250 is only 1.6% of my last 250 edits which is good.:) An A+.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC) No, uninstalling Huggle from your computer would not remove rollback from your account. Useight (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Hmm, interesting question. I'm not positive, but I'm pretty confident that if an admin disabled your use of Huggle, it would not automatically remove rollback. However, I imagine that the admin revoking Huggle would also remove rollback rights. Useight (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC) Just to clarify here; removing rollback automatically disables Huggle, but not the other way round. If someone's misusing Huggle the admin will sometimes remove Huggle without removing rollback, as removal of rollback stays in your log and can come back to haunt you, while removing Huggle is "invisible". (Rollback is a lot harder to misuse than Huggle.) – ırıdescent 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Huggle

I went through all your reverts in your last 250 article edits (which were mostly reverts, so I looked at quite a lot of reverts). I found this, in which you didn't completely remove the vandalism. There was also this in which you just fixed spacing. This edit didn't remove vandalism (but you fixed it with your next edit). Your edit summary here wasn't the best. So it appears that there were 4 edits in the last 250 that could have been better. Useight (talk) 07:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Generally speaking you have improved significantly in recent weeks. :-) — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 08:23, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Well thank you 4/250 is only 1.6% of my last 250 edits which is good.:) An A+.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:24, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

No, uninstalling Huggle from your computer would not remove rollback from your account. Useight (talk) 20:20, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Hmm, interesting question. I'm not positive, but I'm pretty confident that if an admin disabled your use of Huggle, it would not automatically remove rollback. However, I imagine that the admin revoking Huggle would also remove rollback rights. Useight (talk) 20:29, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Just to clarify here; removing rollback automatically disables Huggle, but not the other way round. If someone's misusing Huggle the admin will sometimes remove Huggle without removing rollback, as removal of rollback stays in your log and can come back to haunt you, while removing Huggle is "invisible". (Rollback is a lot harder to misuse than Huggle.) – ırıdescent 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Happy (late) Independence Day (as asked)!

Happy Independence Day!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Happy Independence Day!!!!!
RyRy (talk) 04:28, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

That's better!:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:39, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Maybe I'll (try to[I'm not good with the more advanced editing stuff]) give a card for Halloween.Thanksgiving.Christmas,etc.,did I forget any holidays?:P.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Prods & CSDs

Deletion Discussion
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Just to give you a heads up, prods are different than CSDs - a user can remove a prod if he/so chooses, unlike with a csds. If that happens and the artilce still doesn't look noteworthy, next thing to do is sign it up for an AFDs. -WarthogDemon 01:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Yes but can the article author rm the prod tag?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC) He can. Usually when they do so it's to contest and improve the article. Other times, such as this, the article doesn't improve and that's when afd comes in. -WarthogDemon 01:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Okay then thanks. That's an important and useful piece of info,thanks for sharing it with me.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC) For anybody watching this page the article is this one--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Deletion Discussion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Just to give you a heads up, prods are different than CSDs - a user can remove a prod if he/so chooses, unlike with a csds. If that happens and the artilce still doesn't look noteworthy, next thing to do is sign it up for an AFDs. -WarthogDemon 01:49, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes but can the article author rm the prod tag?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

He can. Usually when they do so it's to contest and improve the article. Other times, such as this, the article doesn't improve and that's when afd comes in. -WarthogDemon 01:53, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay then thanks. That's an important and useful piece of info,thanks for sharing it with me.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:54, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

For anybody watching this page the article is this one--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

BT

Again...Off Topic!
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Bionictest, according to Bluegoblin7 (click the link for more info) has been hacked. BG says we're gonna have to start over. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 14:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC) I have created an account at the new wiki.This is the confirmation message.The spam filter blocked the links, sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC) OMG, you have to solve a math problem(e.g. 25-4,a sorta of a captcha) for every single edit!.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC) Yeh we're working on that. Once you have staff you won't have to. Rights forthcoming, and a better link is http://bionictest.no-ip.org/testwiki. B G 7even 15:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Again...Off Topic!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bionictest, according to Bluegoblin7 (click the link for more info) has been hacked. BG says we're gonna have to start over. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 14:44, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

I have created an account at the new wiki.This is the confirmation message.The spam filter blocked the links, sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:47, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

OMG, you have to solve a math problem(e.g. 25-4,a sorta of a captcha) for every single edit!.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:51, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeh we're working on that. Once you have staff you won't have to. Rights forthcoming, and a better link is http://bionictest.no-ip.org/testwiki. B G 7even 15:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requesting assistance with clearcut vandal

Anti-Vandal Request
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. You issued a last warning but the anon IP user has continued to vandalize The Dark Knight (film): Please see previous warnings and block log for User talk:71.181.152.76. The article may need semi-protection due to repeated acts of vandalism from anon IP users, which seem to be increasing in frequency lately. Thank you for any administrative assistance that you might be able to provide. --NYScholar (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC) While I was trying to add this request here, another administrator blocked the IP address for a week more. Thanks for your earlier efforts. --NYScholar (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Your welcome and I should add a little reminder vandals must go over a final warning before they should be reported or blocked. Also I'm not an admin!:)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Anti-Vandal Request

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

You issued a last warning but the anon IP user has continued to vandalize The Dark Knight (film): Please see previous warnings and block log for User talk:71.181.152.76. The article may need semi-protection due to repeated acts of vandalism from anon IP users, which seem to be increasing in frequency lately. Thank you for any administrative assistance that you might be able to provide. --NYScholar (talk) 00:31, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

While I was trying to add this request here, another administrator blocked the IP address for a week more. Thanks for your earlier efforts. --NYScholar (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Your welcome and I should add a little reminder vandals must go over a final warning before they should be reported or blocked. Also I'm not an admin!:)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:06, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re: AfD's

Just a Thank You
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Thanks for the pointer about the script. The main reason I added the {{closing}} tag was because I knew I was going to be long-winded in my deletion summary, so I wanted a chance to say, 'Yeah, hang on, let me finish my speech here.' :) —C.Fred (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC) My reply here--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Just a Thank You

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Thanks for the pointer about the script. The main reason I added the {{closing}} tag was because I knew I was going to be long-winded in my deletion summary, so I wanted a chance to say, 'Yeah, hang on, let me finish my speech here.' :) —C.Fred (talk) 16:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

My reply here--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:41, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Recent non-admin closures

Some Very Important Tips
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I noticed a couple problems with 2 non-admin closures you made today. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheetah Girls: The Rise to Fame - 2 problems. Only admins can delete (already been pointed out), and you'd already participated in the discussion. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noyes Records‎ - This was only open for one day. Why would it be closed early as no consensus? Let it go for the full five days before making that call. Researching for info and commenting on the XfDs is great, but you shouldn't be in a rush to get discussions closed. --Onorem ♠Dil 16:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the pointers. I'll keep them in mind.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:39, 8 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Some Very Important Tips

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I appreciate the enthusiasm, but I noticed a couple problems with 2 non-admin closures you made today.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Cheetah Girls: The Rise to Fame - 2 problems. Only admins can delete (already been pointed out), and you'd already participated in the discussion.
Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noyes Records‎ - This was only open for one day. Why would it be closed early as no consensus? Let it go for the full five days before making that call.

Researching for info and commenting on the XfDs is great, but you shouldn't be in a rush to get discussions closed. --Onorem ♠Dil 16:35, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the pointers. I'll keep them in mind.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:39, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

BT again

Once again....off topic
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Check out BT. We got messageboxes to work. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC) There now.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Once again....off topic

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Check out BT. We got messageboxes to work. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:00, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

There now.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

BT... SORRY!

Off-Topic Problem
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Hey Xp, Any ideas for a logo/favicon? Or even better... do you have one/can you make one? B G 7even 18:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Mmmmh the old wikirights logo? I'm busy writing at DT's political blog right now.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 18:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Yeh maybe.. but we would need to get rid of the WikiRights! Can you do that and email it me? I've got a few technical issues . ;) B G 7even 18:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Do what?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC) Edit the old logo and remove WikiRights from it? B G 7even 19:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC) No idea where the logo is or how to edit it.Sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Off-Topic Problem

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hey Xp,

Any ideas for a logo/favicon? Or even better... do you have one/can you make one?

B G 7even 18:45, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Mmmmh the old wikirights logo? I'm busy writing at DT's political blog right now.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 18:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Yeh maybe.. but we would need to get rid of the WikiRights! Can you do that and email it me? I've got a few technical issues . ;) B G 7even 18:54, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Do what?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:32, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Edit the old logo and remove WikiRights from it? B G 7even 19:53, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

No idea where the logo is or how to edit it.Sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:13, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

WP:HAU, Status, and you!

Bot message
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Bot message

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible) system - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 22:43, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Talk page

Thanks for the revert. He's early tonight; the asylum must let them out in the afternoon these days. --Rodhull andemu 22:27, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Please wait at least 2 seconds before deletion

Issue Resolved
I was in the process of FIXING my redirect link. Thank you for your patience Bwilkins (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Very well then. If it is fixed it won't be deleted.Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Huggle is useful yet dangerous. The original article was created at 12:52. Marked for deletion at 12:52 while I was editing it. Although I appreciate trying to keep junk off Wikipedia, please give all new articles at least a few minutes to be corrected in the future. Thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwilkins (talk • contribs) 17:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Okay then. I do usually ignore new pages and don't attempt to tag them unless they're advertising,vandalism,tests,etc anything about which there is no doubt it should be deleted. However recently a lot of bad redirects were created as tests ect. without the editor trying to fix them so I was waiting as long.Sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Understood ... but it's not a race, and a quick visit to my contribs page would show that I regularly (maybe too regularly?) clean up my own pages :) Thx again!Bwilkins (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Agreed additionally please sign using ~~~~--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Issue Resolved

I was in the process of FIXING my redirect link. Thank you for your patience Bwilkins (talk) 16:55, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Very well then. If it is fixed it won't be deleted.Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:56, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Huggle is useful yet dangerous. The original article was created at 12:52. Marked for deletion at 12:52 while I was editing it. Although I appreciate trying to keep junk off Wikipedia, please give all new articles at least a few minutes to be corrected in the future. Thanks in advance! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bwilkins (talk • contribs) 17:13, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay then. I do usually ignore new pages and don't attempt to tag them unless they're advertising,vandalism,tests,etc anything about which there is no doubt it should be deleted. However recently a lot of bad redirects were created as tests ect. without the editor trying to fix them so I was waiting as long.Sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:16, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Understood ... but it's not a race, and a quick visit to my contribs page would show that I regularly (maybe too regularly?) clean up my own pages :) Thx again!Bwilkins (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Agreed additionally please sign using ~~~~--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

New Wiki

Non-Wikipedia Issue
Did Bluegoblin change the wiki name like he said, b/c I can't get on the site. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC) I can't either. Ugh...--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC) He's in the middle of it. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 17:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Okay then thanks.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks. Sometimes my stupid computer (it's five years old) doesn't work on just ONE site for no reason at all, so I just wanted to make sure. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Non-Wikipedia Issue

Did Bluegoblin change the wiki name like he said, b/c I can't get on the site. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:04, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

I can't either. Ugh...--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:05, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

He's in the middle of it. Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 17:06, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay then thanks.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:07, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Sometimes my stupid computer (it's five years old) doesn't work on just ONE site for no reason at all, so I just wanted to make sure. Cheers, Kodster ^{(heLLo) (Me did that)} 17:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

AIV

Great work at AIV but please remember we aren't supposed to block IPs until they vandalize after a 4th level warning. –xenocidic (talk) 21:44, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

mmmmm....kay. Sorry it's just annoying after a while.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Offline.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:47, 4 July 2008 (UTC)

Raccoon City AfD closure

Yet Again
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Hello there, I've reverted your close of this AfD. I've noticed that you've gotten reminders previously about being too eager to close AfDs, and I'm going to ask you to please keep this in mind. Take a look at Wikipedia:Non-admin closure for exactly which AfDs non-admins can close; namely, speedy keeps or snow keeps only. There's no hurry to be closing AfDs prematurely. This isn't an official warning, but please be much more cautious from now on. GlassCobra 02:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC) I'm completely ignoring AfDs for the next several months or so.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 02:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Yet Again

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hello there, I've reverted your close of this AfD. I've noticed that you've gotten reminders previously about being too eager to close AfDs, and I'm going to ask you to please keep this in mind. Take a look at Wikipedia:Non-admin closure for exactly which AfDs non-admins can close; namely, speedy keeps or snow keeps only. There's no hurry to be closing AfDs prematurely. This isn't an official warning, but please be much more cautious from now on. GlassCobra 02:18, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm completely ignoring AfDs for the next several months or so.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 02:20, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Re block

Thank You Note
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Already done ;) Thanks for the note. EyeSerene^talk 19:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC) Excellent work, Xp54321. Be proud ;-) Tan \| 39 19:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC) I am always humble.:)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank You Note

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Already done ;) Thanks for the note. EyeSerene^talk 19:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Excellent work, Xp54321. Be proud ;-) Tan | 39 19:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

I am always humble.:)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:26, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Barnstar!

		The Original Barnstar
		Thanks for helping show that I was not a bad faith editor :) DiaperPower (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Well deserved, Xp54321. EyeSerene^talk 19:39, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

(in response to DiaperPower)Your welcome. I see you discovered WP:STAR! LOL, I have a slight phobia concerning barnstars.(Story is too long to tell).Good luck and happy editing!:) (In response to EyeSerene) Enough already...*chuckles* before I develop an ego or something.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:41, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Well, if you think there's a danger of that, go for RfA. If the process doesn't cure it, making decisions like indefblocking good-faith editors will :P EyeSerene^talk 19:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Very good point.RfA is killer.;)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:46, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

Owwwwwwwwww bling bling, nice barnstar. Please stop using the collapse thing, it stops gossip and stuff he. :-) — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 19:42, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry R2. Unless I want my talk like Iridescent's(In terms of length) I collapse any and all discussions as to keep my talkpage orderly.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:01, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

OK, you win :D — Realist² (Come Speak To Me) 20:11, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Of course!:P In the meanwhile I'm on Huggle right now.Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:12, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Notice to my talk page

Huggle Mistake
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Hi Xp54321, would you please check the edit I made which prompted your notice to me? I think you will see that I was reverting vandalism [1]. If you agree, would you remove the note from my talk page? Much appreciated, 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Done Sorry about that you beat me to the revert so I accidentally warned you instead.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC) No harm. We reverters are a zealous crew. 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Great then!:) Do you have an account yet? If not consider creating one.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Had one for nearly two years, racked up many edits, helped with a few FAs and received a batch of barnstars. 'Retired' and continue anonymously reverting vandalism. Thanks, 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Retired!?:( Why?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC) Clearly I'm not really retired. But I had stopped editing for content, and was tired of having my user and talk pages vandalized, which is inevitable when you edit vandalism. Also I am putting more energy into writing for publication. But the reversion game is still of interest, because Wikipedia is a decent venture, and I admire the integrity and goals of those who contribute positively. 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC) One of those users who quit because of frustration?:( Glad you didn't completely retire.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC) In part. But a two-year stint and 14,000 edits is a pretty heavy-duty compulsion, so no one is to blame. Sometimes one just has to make a change. It has been great fun, and I've corresponded with some interesting contributors. Cheers, 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Huggle Mistake

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Hi Xp54321, would you please check the edit I made which prompted your notice to me? I think you will see that I was reverting vandalism [1]. If you agree, would you remove the note from my talk page? Much appreciated, 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Done Sorry about that you beat me to the revert so I accidentally warned you instead.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:32, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

No harm. We reverters are a zealous crew. 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:39, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Great then!:) Do you have an account yet? If not consider creating one.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:40, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Had one for nearly two years, racked up many edits, helped with a few FAs and received a batch of barnstars. 'Retired' and continue anonymously reverting vandalism. Thanks, 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Retired!?:( Why?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:46, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Clearly I'm not really retired. But I had stopped editing for content, and was tired of having my user and talk pages vandalized, which is inevitable when you edit vandalism. Also I am putting more energy into writing for publication. But the reversion game is still of interest, because Wikipedia is a decent venture, and I admire the integrity and goals of those who contribute positively. 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:51, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

One of those users who quit because of frustration?:( Glad you didn't completely retire.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:53, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

In part. But a two-year stint and 14,000 edits is a pretty heavy-duty compulsion, so no one is to blame. Sometimes one just has to make a change. It has been great fun, and I've corresponded with some interesting contributors. Cheers, 99.173.23.182 (talk) 20:58, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Noyes Records

Why I Need a Vacation
Having participated in the discussion, you should have no part in closing this AfD. Relisting the discussion would have been a more appropriate course of action anyway. Please revert yourself. Best, HiDrNick! 00:28, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Noyes Records

Yikes...
Seriously, Xp, what the hell did you think you were doing here? There is no way that should have been closed at all, let alone was it an appropriate non-admin closure. You were the only editor arguing to keep it. As you've been told many, many times, we appreciate you're trying to help but "anyone can edit this page" doesn't mean "anyone should edit this page". If you're going to get involved in XfD closures – one of the most controversial areas on Wikipedia even for our most experienced admins – please make sure you understand the policies you're enforcing and don't try to make them up as you go along. – iride scent 00:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC) I agree with Iridescent and have reopened the debate. Please reread WP:NAC as well as our deletion policy. Thanks, Keeper \| 76 \| Disclaimer 01:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Yikes...

Seriously, Xp, what the hell did you think you were doing here? There is no way that should have been closed at all, let alone was it an appropriate non-admin closure. You were the only editor arguing to keep it. As you've been told many, many times, we appreciate you're trying to help but "anyone can edit this page" doesn't mean "anyone should edit this page". If you're going to get involved in XfD closures – one of the most controversial areas on Wikipedia even for our most experienced admins – please make sure you understand the policies you're enforcing and don't try to make them up as you go along. – iride scent 00:43, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

I agree with Iridescent and have reopened the debate. Please reread WP:NAC as well as our deletion policy. Thanks, Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 01:18, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

Question

Question by Vandal
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. How the gosh do I add an edit summary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.26.184 (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC) At the bottom of the edit box you will see a much smaller box titled "edit summary" it is small and long.Use it to summarize your changes or explain what you are doing etc.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Your edits are most definitely vandalism..STOP!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Question by Vandal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

How the gosh do I add an edit summary? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.105.26.184 (talk) 16:52, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

At the bottom of the edit box you will see a much smaller box titled "edit summary" it is small and long.Use it to summarize your changes or explain what you are doing etc.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Your edits are most definitely vandalism.

.STOP!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:02, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

CBM

Tags
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. Hmm why? (The edit trace is pretty clear - one person logging in as three accounts to promote a magazine) Tedickey (talk) 17:18, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Mmmmh?I was attempting to restore the tags but I removed content so I reverted myself.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:19, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Thanks - it wasn't entirely clear - I'll add back the tags Tedickey (talk) 17:36, 12 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I'm sure you already know what I'm about to say

Rollback
Since I can see you posted to Xenocidic's talkpage a couple of minutes before me, I assume you've seen my post there; I've just made the connection between the history of that page and you. There is absolutely no way this could be considered a legitimate use of rollback. Please be more careful; whatever you might think of us, nobody wants to take rollback away from you again, but in light of your history consider this a final-final-warning. – iride scent 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC) My suggestion would be to slow down a bit. There's no need to rush whilst using huggle - if you don't get to it, someone else will. When I was using huggle (yes, I used it for a short time), I rarely used the "revert and warn" button unless I was absolutely sure and the vandalism was completely off-the-wall inappropriate. If I was only 95% sure, I would just revert (no warn). If I was less than 90% sure it was vandalism, I'd just let it go (heck, that queue fills up so fast - let someone else review it). Anyways, hope this helps. –xenocidic (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Rollback

Since I can see you posted to Xenocidic's talkpage a couple of minutes before me, I assume you've seen my post there; I've just made the connection between the history of that page and you. There is absolutely no way this could be considered a legitimate use of rollback. Please be more careful; whatever you might think of us, nobody wants to take rollback away from you again, but in light of your history consider this a final-final-warning. – iride scent 17:54, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

My suggestion would be to slow down a bit. There's no need to rush whilst using huggle - if you don't get to it, someone else will. When I was using huggle (yes, I used it for a short time), I rarely used the "revert and warn" button unless I was absolutely sure and the vandalism was completely off-the-wall inappropriate. If I was only 95% sure, I would just revert (no warn). If I was less than 90% sure it was vandalism, I'd just let it go (heck, that queue fills up so fast - let someone else review it). Anyways, hope this helps. –xenocidic (talk) 18:05, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Sig

My New Signature!
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. [[User:Xp54321\|<font color="0070FF">'''Xp''54321''''']]</font><sup> ([[User talk:Xp54321\|<font color="4CBB17">'''''Hello!'''''</font>]] • [[Special:Contributions/Xp54321\|<font color="4CBB17">'''''Contribs'''''</font>]])</sup> Try that. — Realist² (Speak) 16:54, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Result = Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Woah!:D Nice!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Cheers, I made the numbers into italics as if its a real count down, hehe. I have to get back to some serious reading now, later. — Realist² (Speak) 17:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

My New Signature!

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[[User:Xp54321|'''Xp''54321''''']] ([[User talk:Xp54321|'''''Hello!''''']] • [[Special:Contributions/Xp54321|'''''Contribs''''']])

Try that. — Realist² (Speak) 16:54, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Result = Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Woah!:D Nice!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Cheers, I made the numbers into italics as if its a real count down, hehe. I have to get back to some serious reading now, later. — Realist² (Speak) 17:01, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Chemgeek + BG7

Hi! Would you mind letting me see some of the evidence you have? stwalkerster AT googlemail.com is my email address. Thanks, :-) Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:11, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Forwarding now. Bluegoblin7 is laughing on email because he says ANI doesn't thinks it's him. Well these emails prove it.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 20:43, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks :-) Stwalkerster [ talk ] 20:57, 13 July 2008 (UTC)

Come on IRC

we need to talk, come to my room on irc «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l» (talk) 11:44, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Um...where? At BT? At Special:Mibbit?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:35, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

What the...

What happened on the last 24 hours!? BG7 is now blocked based on evidence East718 provided.(Which I believe) Were Kodster and I right or is some other explanation the truth?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:58, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

your ANI thread

I removed your AN/I thread - what somebody does with their own wiki is absolutely nothing at all to do with us - nothing at all. --Allemandtando (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

Fine but I'm stopping this guy whoever he is at his own wiki.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank you

		Thank you!
		Xp54321, it is with deep awareness of the responsibility conferred by your trust that I am honored to report that in part to your support, my request for adminship passed (87/14/6). I deeply value the trust you and the Wikipedia community have in me, and I will embark on a new segment of my Wikipedia career by putting my new tools to work to benefit the entire community. My best to you, Happyme22 (talk) 03:12, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Good luck Happyme22!:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 04:20, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

I noticed your edits to talk pages...

and decided you deserve this:

		The Original Barnstar
		For your work on many talk pages. Although the work is very fun, and it isn't very rewarding, you did a lot of it. Awesome. Leonard^(Bloom) 21:21, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Well,thank you.IMO articles should have good talkpages which encourage good discussions.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 21:32, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Adoption

Hi, I have a user box on my page that says I'm your adopter still, would you be offended if I remove it? It is just that you have come a long way and don't need adoption anymore. It's a good thing not a bad thing, right? — Realist² (Speak) 02:32, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Um....I wouldn't be offended but am I a grad yet of WP:ADOPT yet? Eh...alright I need to remove the adoptee templates on my userpage. I'm a full-fledged editor now.Thanks for your help over the last few months R2 it's been much appreciated.Of course don't expect the questions to stop on coming.....:P--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:17, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Adoptee ubxs removed(See edit summary,:P)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:20, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

there's always the {{AdopteeGrad}} and {{AdopterProud}} ubx'es , if you so desire. –xeno (talk) 15:39, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

<sarcasm>Oh thanks Xeno! Mess up my auto-archiving!</sarcasm> Nah it wasn't working;).Thanks I'll use the adopteegrad ubx. --Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 15:41, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Adoptee
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Leonard^(Bloom) 02:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Oh yeah, that was a long time ago. Your welcome.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Thank you so much. What do you need? Where can I send it? When can we start?--Len Berzerk (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Yes, Yes, Yes, Please. I want to be down.--Len Berzerk (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC) My reply here.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Ok alittle nervous but i'm going to try now.--Len Berzerk (talk) 16:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Very well,keep this conversation on your talkpage.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Ok I deleted everything. And put the code in my userpage. I previewed it and it says up for speedy deletion for blanking the page. I didn't save because I don't want to be band from here. What to do?--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Yes.G7 is part of WP:CSD. G7 means the author requests deletion.You won't get in trouble for asking for deletion of your userpage. In fact you'll get out of trouble.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Cool give me two minutes and it's done.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC) I did it.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Keep this on your talkpage.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Ok i cleaned out my page.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Hangon Len, I'm asking the deleting admin now why he/she deleted.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC) I've responded at my talk page. Happyme22 (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC) No problem still here just reading what you sent so far.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Got ya. Following your lead.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC) I reading. But I have doctors appointment at 2:30 and it's 1:45pm in New York. I don't know where you are, but tonight i'll be back on line. How can i reach you at that time? Or do I reply to your response and wait till you hit me back on line?--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Sounds good. Will do. I got to log off now but i'll hit you up later. Ok. Thanks a miilion again. Speak to you later.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Oh don't worry so much about time. I'm in southern CA so subtract 3 hours. Also I'll be busy later this afternoon about 3-7pm(6-10pm ur time) so I probably won't be available then. Also on the side you should see a box titled "toolbox" if you want you can click the "e-mail this user" link to email me.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Adoptee

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my userpage. Leonard^(Bloom) 02:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh yeah, that was a long time ago. Your welcome.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you so much. What do you need? Where can I send it? When can we start?--Len Berzerk (talk) 16:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, Yes, Yes, Please. I want to be down.--Len Berzerk (talk) 16:53, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

My reply here.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok alittle nervous but i'm going to try now.--Len Berzerk (talk) 16:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Very well,keep this conversation on your talkpage.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok I deleted everything. And put the code in my userpage. I previewed it and it says up for speedy deletion for blanking the page. I didn't save because I don't want to be band from here. What to do?--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes.G7 is part of WP:CSD. G7 means the author requests deletion.You won't get in trouble for asking for deletion of your userpage. In fact you'll get out of trouble.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Cool give me two minutes and it's done.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:13, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I did it.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Keep this on your talkpage.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:19, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Ok i cleaned out my page.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:18, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Hangon Len, I'm asking the deleting admin now why he/she deleted.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:26, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I've responded at my talk page. Happyme22 (talk) 17:27, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

No problem still here just reading what you sent so far.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:33, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Got ya. Following your lead.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:37, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I reading. But I have doctors appointment at 2:30 and it's 1:45pm in New York. I don't know where you are, but tonight i'll be back on line. How can i reach you at that time? Or do I reply to your response and wait till you hit me back on line?--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Sounds good. Will do. I got to log off now but i'll hit you up later. Ok. Thanks a miilion again. Speak to you later.--Len Berzerk (talk) 17:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Oh don't worry so much about time. I'm in southern CA so subtract 3 hours. Also I'll be busy later this afternoon about 3-7pm(6-10pm ur time) so I probably won't be available then. Also on the side you should see a box titled "toolbox" if you want you can click the "e-mail this user" link to email me.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 17:55, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Xp54321. You have new messages at Shapiros10's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Shapiros10 ^{contact me}_{My work} 19:29, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Kay thanks. My adoptee is offline right now.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 19:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

ACC Tool

WP:ACC
Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 22:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Are you an "interface admin" Ryan?:) Yes it was me.Confirmed.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Done Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 22:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC) So you are an admin?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Xp, you have been granted the tool, even when you have no experience with ACC. Please don't use the tool as a badge. If you don't do some account creating, it will be revoked. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 22:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC) A badge? No way! I'll get working on it immediately. Mind giving me a hand? --Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Hangon I'm reading the documentation now. I'm surprised I was approved so fast.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Yes I am an admin on the tool, I've granted you access based on trust but bear in mind the tool is watched over by many admins who'll revoke your access without hesitation on the slightest hint of abuse. With that said...I'm sure you'll do fine and if you need help, just ask away! :) ——RyanLupin • (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC) I can assure I won't abuse it but I may make mistakes. From what I understand from reading the documentation: Check for multiple requests and if the user is a vandal/sockpuppeter/troll Check to see if the username is too similar to a current one Defer the request if it is too similar Create the account if there are no problems What about the password? The requesting user gets it automatically by email correct?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 23:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC) All you really need to do is check the IPs recent contributions for vandalism, if the log is clean then click the create button. Don't worry about whether their requested username is too similar as you'll get notified of that. Don't worry about a password as the system will automatically generate one with the email. If the username is too similar, that's when you defer it to admins. Just read through WP:ACC/G, everything you need to know is on there. If you need help, feel free to message me or there's the IRC channel (#wikipedia-en-accounts) which is always buzzing with account creators. Don't worry too much, I have faith in you :) ——RyanLupin • (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Yes, just leave the password blank and click "By email" when you create the account. –xeno (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC) Yes well done :) I noticed you tried adding a template on the new user's talk page which is great but just so you know, in your preferences section on the tool here there's an option to select automated welcoming which allows one of User:SQL's bots to greet them so you don't have too ——RyanLupin • (talk) 00:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Hehe. Great then. I was worried at first but nothing went wrong so....:). Thanks for the pointer about the bot. I'll see to it.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 00:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Using the bot to greet new users isn't compulsory. You're welcome to greet them yourself. Some users may appreciate a more personal welcome over an automated bot message but it's up to you ——RyanLupin • (talk) 00:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Hey Xp, when you go to create a new user account but you get a notification that says the username is too similar to an existing one. Check the creation and contribution logs. If the user has been inactive for a long period of time, you can 'defer it to admins' who can then override the anti-spoof and create the account. The recent user you dropped is an example, Richard 52 has no contributions and created his account in 2006 so it's reasonable to assume that he's not coming back. I've reset your drop and the admin Bjweeks has gone ahead and overwritten it. Good work so far, don't let this discourage you from creating more accounts! :) ——RyanLupin • (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Okay then thanks Ryan! What does the "reset" link on closed requests do?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC) The reset button will re-open the request so it'll bring it back to the 'Open requests' section of the tool. Oh and I know how much you love to monitor your statistics here on wikipedia, your creation statistics can be found here and here. Good luck ——RyanLupin • (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC) Hehe you're making me remember my "editcounting" days. Thanks for the links Ryan!(Lupin that is,too many Ryans)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

WP:ACC

Someone, probably you, requested access to the account creation tool. For security purposes could you please confirm that it was you who made the request so we can approve you, thanks. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 22:49, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Are you an "interface admin" Ryan?:) Yes it was me.Confirmed.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:50, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Done

Thank you for applying to access the account creation tool. I have approved your request. You may now access the tool here. Before you do so, please read the tool's guide to familiarize yourself with the process. You may also want to join #wikipedia-en-accounts on irc and/or the mailing list. Keep in mind that the ACC tool is a powerful program, and misuse may result in your access being suspended by a tool administrator. Don't hesitate to get in touch with me if you have any questions. Thank you for your participating in the account creation process. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 22:51, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

So you are an admin?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:52, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Xp, you have been granted the tool, even when you have no experience with ACC. Please don't use the tool as a badge. If you don't do some account creating, it will be revoked. Thanks, RyRy (talk) 22:54, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

A badge? No way! I'll get working on it immediately. Mind giving me a hand? --Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:57, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Hangon I'm reading the documentation now. I'm surprised I was approved so fast.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 22:58, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes I am an admin on the tool, I've granted you access based on trust but bear in mind the tool is watched over by many admins who'll revoke your access without hesitation on the slightest hint of abuse. With that said...I'm sure you'll do fine and if you need help, just ask away! :) ——RyanLupin • (talk) 23:06, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

I can assure I won't abuse it but I may make mistakes. From what I understand from reading the documentation:

Check for multiple requests and if the user is a vandal/sockpuppeter/troll
Check to see if the username is too similar to a current one
Defer the request if it is too similar
Create the account if there are no problems
What about the password? The requesting user gets it automatically by email correct?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 23:10, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

All you really need to do is check the IPs recent contributions for vandalism, if the log is clean then click the create button. Don't worry about whether their requested username is too similar as you'll get notified of that. Don't worry about a password as the system will automatically generate one with the email. If the username is too similar, that's when you defer it to admins. Just read through WP:ACC/G, everything you need to know is on there. If you need help, feel free to message me or there's the IRC channel (#wikipedia-en-accounts) which is always buzzing with account creators. Don't worry too much, I have faith in you :) ——RyanLupin • (talk) 23:15, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes, just leave the password blank and click "By email" when you create the account. –xeno (talk) 23:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes well done :) I noticed you tried adding a template on the new user's talk page which is great but just so you know, in your preferences section on the tool here there's an option to select automated welcoming which allows one of User:SQL's bots to greet them so you don't have too ——RyanLupin • (talk) 00:31, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hehe. Great then. I was worried at first but nothing went wrong so....:). Thanks for the pointer about the bot. I'll see to it.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 00:34, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Using the bot to greet new users isn't compulsory. You're welcome to greet them yourself. Some users may appreciate a more personal welcome over an automated bot message but it's up to you ——RyanLupin • (talk) 00:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hey Xp, when you go to create a new user account but you get a notification that says the username is too similar to an existing one. Check the creation and contribution logs. If the user has been inactive for a long period of time, you can 'defer it to admins' who can then override the anti-spoof and create the account. The recent user you dropped is an example, Richard 52 has no contributions and created his account in 2006 so it's reasonable to assume that he's not coming back. I've reset your drop and the admin Bjweeks has gone ahead and overwritten it. Good work so far, don't let this discourage you from creating more accounts! :) ——RyanLupin • (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Okay then thanks Ryan! What does the "reset" link on closed requests do?--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:12, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

The reset button will re-open the request so it'll bring it back to the 'Open requests' section of the tool. Oh and I know how much you love to monitor your statistics here on wikipedia, your creation statistics can be found here and here. Good luck ——RyanLupin • (talk) 16:17, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hehe you're making me remember my "editcounting" days. Thanks for the links Ryan!(Lupin that is,too many Ryans)--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 16:20, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Re: Co-Adoption

Sorry Xp, as stated in my adopter profile here, I'm only accepting adoption requests if I'm absolutely required i.e. if a user wants me and me alone ~~(no sexual innuendo implied)~~. I'm preparing myself to go on a looooong wikibreak shortly so I don't really want to commit myself at the moment. Regards ——RyanLupin • (talk) 01:04, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Would like to know If I'm doing some stuff right hit me back. How can you see my work.--Len Berzerk (talk) 01:18, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Whats going on peoples. Just wanted to let you know they want me to try building an article. I'm gonna try. When you get a chance can you check it out and tell me what's wrong? I won't post it yet till you get back to me. Don't want to get in any more problems with the community. Thanks--Len Berzerk (talk) 11:10, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes I have. I put something together and i wanted to try it out. I'll post it to see what happens and maybe you can touch it up? I'll post it now.--Len Berzerk (talk) 02:08, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Please don't revert on User_talk pages...

Please don't revert on User_talk pages (as you did on mine) -- it still triggers the new message banner, but when folks look at their talk page, there's nothing new there. If you make a mistaken edit to a talk page, it's better to add an apology and explanation (and maybe remove most of the original, mistaken, text if you wish) than to simply revert. Hope this doesn't come across as too much of old-fart grumbling. ;-) JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:03, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I posted it. Check all links and let me know how i did.--Len Berzerk (talk) 13:52, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

I made a few correction to make everything fall in place. It should pretty much be done if you say it's a go. Let me know.--Len Berzerk (talk) 15:48, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Suggestion

Hi Xp,

Just a tip,

Can I suggest you stop getting your user to write about themself straight away?

Not only does it breach several policies (WP:COI coming straight to mind), but it is also frowned upon, and also I think your user should be taught about wikiquette and wikimarkup first of all, namely how to format talk page threads instead of jumping on someone elses.

Adoption is about teaching people how to edit the wiki, not just helping them here and there. If you're interested, you may borrow my adoption programme.

B G 7even 16:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry about this Bluegoblin7. I was away today and have been extremely busy recently I only agreed to adopt him at Shapiros10's pleading. He was on the way to a block and he's a good-faith editor but I don't have the time at the moment to assume full adoption responsibility. I'm leaving for Las Vegas tomorrow and will be there for 3 days. I may be able to edit though I doubt it as I'll be busy enjoying shos circuses etc. Please don't WP:ABF or WP:BITE but at the same time don't be afraid to ask an admin to WP:BLOCK for WP:VANDAL. I cannot really accept some responisiblity for his actions as I was too busy to be in a position to help him. Sorry.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 01:04, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Young admins

I saw your userpage recently and noticed you want to be an administrator! Best of luck in becoming one, although I'd suggest refraining from publicly displaying your age if you plan on submitting an RfA—I'm sure you remember this disaster, and I would hate to see it happen again. I'm glad you removed your age from your userpage, but I also reccomend not stating it anywhere else as there is a lot of controversy surrounding minors and adminship. Hope you didn't find this too WP:BITEy, this is just a friendly reminder. :-) Cheers, —Mizu onna sango15^Hello! 22:28, 25 July 2008 (UTC).

Mizu onna sango15, I happen to know of many young admins all of whom perform their duty as maturely and efficiently as their older associates. ——RyanLupin • (talk) 22:30, 25 July 2008 (UTC)

What are you talking about Mizu? I didn't remove my age.<confused>:|--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 00:55, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I hear you. But know i'm lost cause some people wrote these bio's and stuff i'm just posting it. So i must cancel my account and have someone else post it? This is getting confusing. Well don't want to get use blocked so i'll check the rest of things out. Have a good trip. Hit me when you can.--Len Berzerk (talk) 02:10, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I did and i'm tring to see were i might have messed up but i don't have a clue. I don't know what to write cause then i'll be promoting my self. I tried to use the bio and other info i had done for me and it seems to be no good. I linked everything and they seemed to be working. All links are there and true. With my info on it. It's all good. I'll guess i'll keep tring but really feel it might not work for me.--Len Berzerk (talk) 02:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm doing my homework just was excited. Want people to have access to my background history in the music. So after the Tutorial what to do next.--Len Berzerk (talk) 02:45, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

re: suggestion

I think you archived a bit aggressively, Xp, as you nuked topics that weren't really resolved. Anyway, regarding User:Lenberzerk, I don't think you've got a solid grasp on what's going on, and should perhaps suggest to Shapiros that somebody else should help him out.

~~He likely wasn't "on the way to a block"~~
~~He certainly isn't about to require a block for vandalism, of all things~~
(added) He's presently open to working on his article outside mainspace. As such, no block, particularly for vandalism, is likely.
He doesn't need 26 varieties of alphabet soup thrown at him with no real support

Now, I'll agree that he isn't going to make headway posting his article, as it presently exists, to mainspace -- but that's two caveats. Neither of those precludes him from working on the article, which is what he's interested in. Is it likely to see the light of day? I don't know -- sourcing the version he has in mind seems unlikely, but there may well be sufficient notability to the discography to justify an article, which WP:COI does not prohibit. So if an article is what he wants to work on, then more power to him -- he's respecting the limits recommended, and that's good. There's no call to pigeonhole him into your vision of what Wikipedia should be about. — Lomn 03:20, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Very well Lomn. BTW I contacted User:Antonio Lopez and he agreed to co-adopt Lenberzer. And please calm down I'm doing my best. I have been extremely busy recently and the "alphabet soup" are all policies/guidelines. I was hoping he would learn them while I was gone.--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:25, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

My point there is that all that serves to do is overwhelm a user and cause them to ignore everything you post. Most of that stuff was neither relevant to a novice user of WP nor to someone interested in writing a particular article -- you pointed him towards a massive list and said "read everything", for crying out loud! "Hoping he would learn them" is likely, frankly, to accomplish nothing, as is making your most verbose description of Wikipedia one of how to bold and/or italicize text. — Lomn 03:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Ugh...I knew saying yes to Shapiros10's request might turn out to be a bad idea...:( Do what you wish. I have a trip to prepare for and I'm not going in low spirits!--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 03:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

"Hi this is Len Berzerks Secretary" I have two questions

1 How do I make the article acceptable
2 Do I need to write the Bio over only referring to the discography?
3 What is wrong with the first article?--Len Berzerk (talk) 03:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Sorry I know i said two but you guys are fast.--Len Berzerk (talk) 03:43, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

What can be done to this page?

Sorry shes speeding know.

External links

{{Request edit}} --Len Berzerk (talk) 04:31, 26 July 2008 (UTC)

Len Berzerk

Article
History of LB " The History Of Len Berzerk " Recording since 1991, air time on 105.9fm ( Red Bandit's Knight Hawks ) program ( 1994 ). Len Berzerk got his first real industry break in 1996, after being invited to the studio by Dj Tony Crush and spittin that fire. He was then asked if he would like to get on a track called " You can't fade me " feat. Grandmaster Caz & The Almighty K G. With out rejecting the offer a week later, Len was blessed with a record with his name on it. In 1997 Len hooked up with Mix Master G Flexx the owner of the studio were " Ya can't fade me " was cut. During 1997 Len joined the Tommy Boy Street team as a promoter Lead By Scott Johnson and Loyal. Between 1997 and 1998 Len has worked with " Michelle San Juan " on a few Interscope Records Project's that lead the career of ( Eminem, Black Eyed Peas, Mya & Kirk Franklin ). The new millinium hits ( 2000 ). Len released " Locked down " under Len Berzerk Music & TheOrchard.com, Signed by Life Allah. Since then the rest is ( His Story ) history. Later on in 2002, Len joined forces with Mike Onee, Bank o Pop & Romeloe to bring forth " Hann.E. Bullz Records ". Traveling back and forth to Belize alot since ( 2001 ) things was set back. Len used this time to get his mind right and chilled in Belize only to join ( 105.9fm in Belize ) Wave Radio's team as an engineer. He then got offered a slot between 3 & 4pm on air for his show ( Bang Out ) in 2004/ 05. Returning home once again he made up his mind to go hard 100% and make his career take off. With joints playing on Mad Rush Radio 104.7 fm and video playing on Rose Records (Cable T. V.), WWPR-FM power1051fm.com, Music Nation.com, itunes & many more..... It is clear to see this MC been around. Da Real Side. R u ready? Stay tuned www.lenberzerk.com American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers Member since 2000 File:Classic Len Berzerk.jpg Len Berzerk Career DJ Tone Tone, Grand Master Caz & The Almighty KG of the Cold Crush Brothers gave Len Berzerk the opportunity to make a guest appearance on one of their albums. He was featured on the single “You Can’t Fade Me” released by Jazz Child Records. Len Berzerk became friends with Mix Master G Flexx who owned the recording studio where “You Can’t Fade Me” was recorded and mastered. Mix Master G Flexx enlisted Len Berzerk to appear on his album titled “Salute to the Hustler” the album was released in Japan in 1997. Len Berzerk performed at clubs throughout New York City. Len Berzerk hosted a radio show on WAVE 105.9FM a popular radio station in Belize. Len Berzerk developed his own label named Len Berzerk Music. He recorded his début album “Da Struggle” the first single released off the album was “Locked Down”. He followed up with “Da Real Side”. His albums can be found on MP3.com, The Orchard.com, Itunes.com, Power1051fm.com, MusicNation.com, Discogs.com and Myspace/LenBerzerk.com. He plans on releasing more material in the near future. But for now you can search him on google.com. Press Releases Grandmaster Caz “Recognize the Real” Grandmaster Caz, The Cold Crush Brothers Channel5belize.com “With September celebrations just around the corner it’s a time when Belizean recording artist start releasing their new music. We were visited this week by on singer promoting a Fresh New CD. Len Berzerk has been signing hip-hop since 1996” Jaqueline Woods, Reporter for News 5 (2002) Channel5belize.com “Jamal Shyne Borrow may be the only Belizean American rap artist to get on B.E.T top ten count down, but another young rapper is also hoping to make it big time. Len Berzerk has more in common with Shyne than just Belizean roots. Now in Belize on holiday, the rapper is promoting his album called “Da Real Side”. Jose Sanchez, Reporter for News 5 (2001) Channel 7 News in Belize “With a release titled “Da Real Side” The release catalogs Len Berzerk’s experiences while living in the U.S. and He gives youth’s sound advice” Jaqueline Woods, Reporter for News 7 (2001) Credits Power 1051FM.com – Len Berzerk -“Hands of Time” MP3.com – Len Berzerk -“Locked Down” TheOrchard.com- Len Berzerk -“Locked Down”, “Da Struggle”, and “Ill Sickness”. Album Listing Len Berzerk Featured on “You Can’t Fade Me” DJ Tone Crush, Grand Master Caz, and The Almighty KG (Jazz Child Records 1996) Len Berzerk Featured on “Salute the hustlers” Mix Master G Flexx (Japan 1997) Locked Down (Len Berzerk Music 2000) Da Struggle (Len Berzerk Music 2005-2008) Ill Sickness (Len Berzerk Music 2007-2008) References ^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] ^[5]

Article

History of LB

" The History Of Len Berzerk " Recording since 1991, air time on 105.9fm ( Red Bandit's Knight Hawks ) program ( 1994 ). Len Berzerk got his first real industry break in 1996, after being invited to the studio by Dj Tony Crush and spittin that fire. He was then asked if he would like to get on a track called " You can't fade me " feat. Grandmaster Caz & The Almighty K G. With out rejecting the offer a week later, Len was blessed with a record with his name on it. In 1997 Len hooked up with Mix Master G Flexx the owner of the studio were " Ya can't fade me " was cut. During 1997 Len joined the Tommy Boy Street team as a promoter Lead By Scott Johnson and Loyal. Between 1997 and 1998 Len has worked with " Michelle San Juan " on a few Interscope Records Project's that lead the career of ( Eminem, Black Eyed Peas, Mya & Kirk Franklin ). The new millinium hits ( 2000 ). Len released " Locked down " under Len Berzerk Music & TheOrchard.com, Signed by Life Allah. Since then the rest is ( His Story ) history. Later on in 2002, Len joined forces with Mike Onee, Bank o Pop & Romeloe to bring forth " Hann.E. Bullz Records ". Traveling back and forth to Belize alot since ( 2001 ) things was set back. Len used this time to get his mind right and chilled in Belize only to join ( 105.9fm in Belize ) Wave Radio's team as an engineer. He then got offered a slot between 3 & 4pm on air for his show ( Bang Out ) in 2004/ 05. Returning home once again he made up his mind to go hard 100% and make his career take off. With joints playing on Mad Rush Radio 104.7 fm and video playing on Rose Records (Cable T. V.), WWPR-FM power1051fm.com, Music Nation.com, itunes & many more..... It is clear to see this MC been around. Da Real Side. R u ready? Stay tuned www.lenberzerk.com
American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers
Member since 2000

File:Classic Len Berzerk.jpg

Len Berzerk

Career

DJ Tone Tone, Grand Master Caz & The Almighty KG of the Cold Crush Brothers gave Len Berzerk the opportunity to make a guest appearance on one of their albums. He was featured on the single “You Can’t Fade Me” released by Jazz Child Records. Len Berzerk became friends with Mix Master G Flexx who owned the recording studio where “You Can’t Fade Me” was recorded and mastered. Mix Master G Flexx enlisted Len Berzerk to appear on his album titled “Salute to the Hustler” the album was released in Japan in 1997. Len Berzerk performed at clubs throughout New York City. Len Berzerk hosted a radio show on WAVE 105.9FM a popular radio station in Belize. Len Berzerk developed his own label named Len Berzerk Music. He recorded his début album “Da Struggle” the first single released off the album was “Locked Down”. He followed up with “Da Real Side”. His albums can be found on MP3.com, The Orchard.com, Itunes.com, Power1051fm.com, MusicNation.com, Discogs.com and Myspace/LenBerzerk.com. He plans on releasing more material in the near future. But for now you can search him on google.com.

Press Releases

Grandmaster Caz

“Recognize the Real”

Grandmaster Caz, The Cold Crush Brothers

Channel5belize.com

“With September celebrations just around the corner it’s a time when Belizean recording artist start releasing their new music. We were visited this week by on singer promoting a Fresh New CD. Len Berzerk has been signing hip-hop since 1996”

Jaqueline Woods, Reporter for News 5 (2002)

Channel5belize.com

“Jamal Shyne Borrow may be the only Belizean American rap artist to get on B.E.T top ten count down, but another young rapper is also hoping to make it big time. Len Berzerk has more in common with Shyne than just Belizean roots. Now in Belize on holiday, the rapper is promoting his album called “Da Real Side”.

Jose Sanchez, Reporter for News 5 (2001)

Channel 7 News in Belize

“With a release titled “Da Real Side” The release catalogs Len Berzerk’s experiences while living in the U.S. and He gives youth’s sound advice”

Jaqueline Woods, Reporter for News 7 (2001)

Credits

Power 1051FM.com – Len Berzerk -“Hands of Time”

MP3.com – Len Berzerk -“Locked Down”

TheOrchard.com- Len Berzerk -“Locked Down”, “Da Struggle”, and “Ill Sickness”.

Album Listing

Len Berzerk Featured on “You Can’t Fade Me” DJ Tone Crush, Grand Master Caz, and The Almighty KG (Jazz Child Records 1996)

Len Berzerk Featured on “Salute the hustlers” Mix Master G Flexx (Japan 1997)

Locked Down (Len Berzerk Music 2000)

Da Struggle (Len Berzerk Music 2005-2008)

Ill Sickness (Len Berzerk Music 2007-2008)

References

^[1] ^[2] ^[3] ^[4] ^[5]

RfA Thanks

Thank you for participating in my RfA, wich was successful with 73 support, 6 oppose, and 5 neutral.

I'll try to be as clear as I can in my communication and to clear some of the admin backlog on images.

If there is anything I can help you with, don't hesitate to ask me on my talk page!

Cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:47, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

RFA thankspam

Thanks for your support in my RFA, which passed with 140 supporting, 11 opposing, and 4 neutral. I will do my best to live up to the trust that you have given to me. If I can ever assist you with anything, just ask.

Cheers!

J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 19:28, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Cheers

Thank you for all your help improving & promoting the Michael Jackson article to WP:FA status. — Realist² (Speak) 01:05, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

No prob R2! Any time.:D--Xp54321^{(Hello! • Contribs)} 00:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)