User talk:Xirtam Esrevni

March 2023

Hi Xirtam Esrevni! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Eric Weinstein that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 21:49, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Got it, thanks for clarifying. Xirtam Esrevni (talk) 22:16, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BOTTOMPOST

Hello. I have moved your comment to the bottom of the page, per WP:BOTTOMPOST. Please also sign your posts, per Wikipedia:Signatures. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 03:46, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Links to draft articles

Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Gerbrand Ceder. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. These links have been removed. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 09:24, 27 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for informing, will not do this in the future. Xirtam Esrevni (talk) 18:12, 28 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shyue Ping Ong (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Tutwakhamoe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Exclusively reliant on profiles and self-published materials, which are insufficient in demonstrating notability. Make sure to include multiple significant coverage from reliable and independent sources to prove that the subject passes WP:NACADEMIC or WP:NBIO. For the claims that are marked with citation needed, add supporting citations, otherwise they need to be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shyue Ping Ong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Xirtam Esrevni! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tutwakhamoe (talk) 02:58, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Prof ShyuePingOng.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Prof ShyuePingOng.svg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Estopedist1 (talk) 07:44, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shyue Ping Ong (November 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by EmeraldRange was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

New sources added are either WP:ROUTINE coverage (profiles), connected to the source via interview or otherwise (fails WP:IS) or just mention Ong (i.e talking about his research or his team). Don't believe the two sources about research meets 1st point of WP:NACADEMIC either.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shyue Ping Ong and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 14:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Shyue Ping Ong has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shyue Ping Ong. Thanks! WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 14:11, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Scope creep. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Draft:Guillaume Verdon have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 20:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COI Noticeboard

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. scope_creep^Talk 20:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Thermodynamic Computing (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

While the topic looks interesting, Wikipedia is not the place for it. All articles are encyclopedic, on established topics. This means that they have to be well documented by multiple sources. This is too soon (WP:TOOSOON), you will need to wait for some years for notability to be established in the wider community first.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Thermodynamic Computing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 23:11, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Thermodynamic Computing

Hello, Xirtam Esrevni. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Thermodynamic Computing, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:11, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR and misrepresentation of sources at Krampus

Back on December 28, 2023, you added these sections to English Wikipedia's Krampus page. Upon inspecting the numerous sources you attached to these claims, it turns out most make no mention whatsoever of Krampus, another simply mentions it as a custom, and a third is essentially a blog post that openly states there's no evidence for what you've attached to it. It would all be here still if I had not removed it. This is outrageous, harms the project's credibility, and should frankly be grounds for permanent barring of your account. I've opened discussion about your behavior on both the Krampus talk page (Talk:Krampus#Explicit_WP:OR_and_intentional_misrepresentation_of_sources_regarding_Krampus_and_anti-semitic_imagery) and on the Fringe noticeboard ([1]), and will be escalating this as necessary. :bloodofox: (talk) 01:44, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]