User talk:Wikiuser music

Welcome!

Hello, Wikiuser music, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rupak Kulkarni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Wgolf (talk) 03:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rupak Kulkarni

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rupak Kulkarni requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 03:50, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored this for you at Draft:Rupak Kulkarni. What we need is some statements about why this person should have an encyclopedia article. THere should be no puffing up language like "prestigious", "finest" "legend", "outstanding exponent", "tender age". And there must be references. What you write must be based on what others have written. Please improve the draft. Let me know when you think it is ready. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 02:04, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The next step is to remove all the WP:PEACOCK language. There is plenty in there that gives the impression of greatness for this musician. However Wikipedia has to let the facts speak for themselves without any glowing language to boost the person's reputation. Words for you to take out are: blown into his breath, exponent, arduous, mastered, legendry, prime, proved to us, artist, rare treat, scintillating, loved and lauded, maestro, connoisseur, top grade, sourght after.

You will also have to indicate what section is referenced by which web site. THis is done with <ref></ref> tags. See WP:Referencing for beginners. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 06:07, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

hi Graeme,

i changed the article.per your inputs and also added links to the references.

please let me know if its ok with you.

regards, Amit Mengane Wikiuser music (talk) 14:08, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rupak Kulkarni (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rupak Kulkarni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Wikiuser music, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse reply

Hello, Wikiuser music. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Cordless Larry (talk) 19:55, 15 April 2016 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rupak Kulkarni (April 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ringbang was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The best references here are the Times of India interview and Pombo (2015). Mid Day is a good source, but for the purpose of establishing notability the coverage is not strong. Direct and detailed coverage in multiple secondary sources is needed. Many of the references here are not usable. Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources explains why.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rupak Kulkarni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ringbang (talk) 19:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Dabangnews.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dabangnews.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:05, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Hansindiannews.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Hansindiannews.jpeg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)(2012-12-04) page22.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)(2012-12-04) page22.pdf. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:06, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)(2012-12-05) page38.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Hindustan Times (Chandigarh)(2012-12-05) page38.pdf. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Hindustan Times (Mumbai)(2012-02-24) page24.pdf

Thanks for uploading File:Hindustan Times (Mumbai)(2012-02-24) page24.pdf. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:07, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rupak Kulkarni (May 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Delta13C was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous problems have not been resolved concerning notability as illustrated in the sources. This draft has terrible formatting problems.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rupak Kulkarni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Delta13C (talk) 11:40, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rupak Kulkarni (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Honestly and simply, no resubmitting until you can use Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Manual_referencing for all listed sources, use this and it will look better; the next thing is to please focus with only the best news sources, such as national or local news; no press releases, trivial passing mentions (articles only mentioning him once or twice are not acceptable), social media links or interviews.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rupak Kulkarni and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 05:38, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rupak Kulkarni

Hello, Wikiuser music. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Rupak Kulkarni".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. TopCipher (talk) 21:06, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

September 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Rupak Kulkarni. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Rupak Kulkarni, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rupak Kulkarni, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]