User talk:Wikiolap

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (on talk pages, Articles for deletion page etc.) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the test area.
You can get help at the Help Desk
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not, Wikipedia:How to write a great article

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

Alexander Mirzayan

Good job on the Alexander Mirzayan article! Eixo 01:50, 30 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pruning

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia! Please see my response to your proposed pruning policy for the Jewish Encyclopedia topics. Thanks, Defrosted 01:37, 21 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your voting!

Hi, thanks for your voting on my RFA. It has finished with the result 88/14/9, and I am promoted. I am really overwhelmed with the amount of support I have got. With some of you we have edited many articles as a team, with some I had bitter arguments in the past, some of you I consider to be living legends of Wikipedia and some nicks I in my ignorance never heard before. I love you all and I am really grateful to you.

If you feel I can help you or Wikipedia as a human, as an editor or with my newly acquired cleaning tools, then just ask and I will be happy to assist. If you will feel that I do not live up to your expectation and renegade on my promises, please contact me. Maybe it was not a malice but just ignorance or a short temper. Thank you very much, once more! abakharev 07:34, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Okkervil River

Hi there! Are you an Okkervil River fan too? I've posted a comment on Talk:Okkervil River about the Tolstaya and Tolstoy. Are you certain they're not related? I'd appreciate your comments. Thanks. :) 71.240.184.165 03:30, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copy edit on web based email

Thanks - definite improvement! Regards --Nigel ^(Talk) 10:34, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CALUMO

I did what you said and created an article on CALUMO and then reinstated the link which you (I think) had removed. All hunky dory. But within ONE minute (I kid you not) there was a speedy delete tag on the article and now it has gone. I assure you the product is real and live and is, essentially (although perhaps SPF wouldn't want to see it phrased quite like this), SPFplus re-worked and ported to a MS platform, albeit with enhancements along the way. And that product has 200 sales and 9500 users under its belt so it does exist. CALUMO is live at roughly half a dozen sites now. But I am not employed by (or otherwise involved with) the company and so cannot vouch for the exact number. How do I go forward from here? Paul Beardsell 04:25, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:David_Ionovich_Bronstein.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:David_Ionovich_Bronstein.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges

Considering your interest in these structures, you may be interested in joining Wikipedia:WikiProject Bridges --Ghirla ^-трёп- 12:42, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chizhik-Pyzhik

Thanks for your message on my talk. Please consider nominating the article on T:TDYK. You may also want to check Portal:Russia/Things you can do. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 17:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Microsoft

I've started a new discussion to reach a true consensus about what to include on the template. As a frequent contributor, I would like to ask that you join the discussion. I look forward to talking with you. --W. Flake ( talk | contribs ) 01:18, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions! Already I can see progress, something that seemed to be lacking in previous discussions. --W. Flake ( talk | contribs ) 04:13, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Allow me

I, Alex Bakharev, hereby award you this barnstar for your fine work on the Saint-Petersburg article. Keep it up!

Did you know?

On 26 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Annenschule, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- Congrats on getting the lead spot. The article was kindly nominated by User:Odengatan GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 16:44, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Pavel Luspekaev, was selected for DYK!

On January 27, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Pavel Luspekaev, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 23:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:WindowsLiveSearch.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:WindowsLiveSearch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 16:08, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You helped choose Vladimir Lenin as this week's WP:ACID winner

Thank you for your support of the Article Improvement Drive.
This week Vladimir Lenin was selected to be improved to featured article status.
Hope you can help.

AzaBot 01:47, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Panorama Software

I may need help with completing the removal process request. The article was up for deletion before and was recreated. If you type "panorama software" in the search it come to this page rather then the categories page about panorama photography. Your help would be appreciated ! John Spikowski 19:20, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect doesn't solve the problem. We are back to square one. If you search on "panorama software" then your directed to this renamed page. Can the redirection be removed and "Panorama Software" page be declared a category and not reused again? John Spikowski 05:54, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Panorama_Software_%28BI%29"

The best solution would be to remove the Panorama Software page altogether so the "Panorama Software" category is found when doing a search instead of this blank page with a category reference. John Spikowski 18:18, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Afd for Panorama Software (BI)

AfD nomination of Panorama Software (BI)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Panorama Software (BI), has been listed by me for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panorama Software (BI). Thank you. - Smerdis of Tlön 20:46, 23 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Adcenter promo.gif

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Adcenter promo.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 17:11, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Berkovsky CDCover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Berkovsky CDCover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leave your hands off MY talk entries

You changed my entry on the Browser page, and I am NOT happy about it. DO NOT edit other person's talk page entries. Do you know nothing about wikiquette? Leave my words alone. I wrote exactly what I wanted to write. ----- I am so angry, right now.... argh!!!! RUDE. Extremely, extremly, extremely rude of you. - Theaveng (talk) 20:20, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I am now in the process of filing a report with an adminstrator. - Theaveng (talk) 20:30, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not even an apology? Jerk. - Theaveng (talk) 18:02, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mikhail Scherbakov.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mikhail Scherbakov.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:37, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MikhailScherbakov.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:MikhailScherbakov.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 18:04, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stone Bridge (St. Petersburg)

On 2 April, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stone Bridge (St. Petersburg), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 00:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your bridge articles

You rock man! I added you a barnstar on the user page. Kostan1 (talk) 20:42, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 27 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hermitage Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 05:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

XMLA

List of XMLA Consumers - WIkipedia is not list of products, and with OLEDB for OLAP and ADOMD.NET supporting XMLA - such list is moot anyways)

Why don’t to complete this list instead of deleting it? --Igor K (talk) 20:54, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 1 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kokushkin Bridge, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Gatoclass (talk) 13:15, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:MSAS2005 AdvWorks.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:MSAS2005 AdvWorks.JPG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 10:57, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Wikiolap (talk) 17:20, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Annenschule WPSchools assessment

Regarding your reassessment of Annenschule: the school is probably High-importance for the schools project, but articles rated High are typically mentioned at the assessment summaries section. Part of the reason it was rated Mid/C-class according to our criteria is because a B-class article should have in-line citations/footnotes per Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria and this one only has external links as references. See Category:GA-Class school articles and Category:FA-Class school articles for examples of relatively well-sourced school articles. Thanks, --Jh12 (talk) 07:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and many thanks for your efforts on the article. --Jh12 (talk) 08:46, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Berkovsky CDCover.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading Image:Berkovsky CDCover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Aspects (talk) 15:08, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image permission problem with Image:Volodarsky Bridge.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Volodarsky Bridge.jpg. I noticed that that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the image (or other media file) agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the GFDL or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the image to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the image has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the image's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Images lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kjetil r (talk) 16:22, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Logo torino 2006.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo torino 2006.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 03:47, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK entry issue

Hello! Your submission of Chicherin House at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed. There still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Nsk92 (talk) 02:30, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Chicherin House

On 17 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chicherin House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 11:02, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Technical fellow

An article that you have been involved in editing, Technical fellow, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Technical fellow. Thank you. B. Wolterding (talk) 00:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:Logo manila 1992.gif)

You've uploaded File:Logo manila 1992.gif, and indicated that it's used under Wikipedia's rules for non-free images. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Wikipedia policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:09, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Kotomin House

On March 2, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kotomin House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 17:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stroganov Palace

On March 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stroganov Palace, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 04:24, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nomination of Jelgava Palace

Hello! Your submission of Jelgava Palace at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Shubinator (talk) 19:37, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Jelgava Palace

On March 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Jelgava Palace, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 09:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Konstantin Danzas

On March 31, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Konstantin Danzas, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Royal broil 01:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Annenschule re-assessment

I changed the assessment on the article Annenschule to Start-class as part of a review of all B-class articles at Wikipedia:WikiProject Schools, I note you changed it to C-class. I have reverted this change. The article has no in-line citations, and only three references at the bottom of the article, which is good given the time period of the school, but is usually barely enough to get past WP:N. In addition, it is a little short still and only has two sections plus a lead (could it be split up into more per WP:WPSCH/AG?). It is close to C-class, but not quite there I think. According to WP:ASSESS this is what a Start article looks like, which bars a lot of reasonable to the article in question. If you disagree with the assessment I would suggest going to WP:WPSCH/A and asking for a re-assessment, or I could get someone to re-assess the article myself. I also take note that you created the article, thank you for your contributions, but please be careful when assessing articles you have created or heavily involved in, as it considered to have a potential conflict of interest. Camaron · Christopher · talk 19:50, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have responded on my talk page. Camaron · Christopher · talk 10:17, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of OLAP Servers

Hi, to the one who changed Comparison of OLAP Servers, how do you add MDX functions in Analysis Services ? Thanks for the changes, —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.72.111.107 (talk) 06:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Using server-side ADOMD.NET inside stored procedures. Wikiolap (talk) 06:24, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--Alvarez 08:47, 14 October 2009 (UTC) : I'm not sure I understood, can you point me to an article for this ? What I wanted to say with Custom MDX functions: lets imagine a new MDX function returning the weighted average -> WAvg( {Set}, Value, Weight ). How can you define this new function in SSAS and use it in all you new MDX functions. What about performance ? -> it's the advantage of open source where you can inject your own functions directly into the server using the same language (Java/C++). I'm newby to wikipedia, sorry for the little mess

Yes you can create new MDX functions, like weigthed average which accepts set, value expression and weight expression and return number. Or it can return any MDX data type, like set or tuple. Unlike open source model you describe - this is portable, because these custom MDX functions are inside .NET assembly and can be brought from server to server. For many examples check out http://www.codeplex.com/ASStoredProcedures. Wikiolap (talk) 07:27, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Jewish Encyclopedia topics

I have been making some changes at WP:JE. (See WT:JE#Changes). I hope these make sense, and have your approval; I'd welcome your thoughts on them in the discussion there. Jheald (talk) 21:43, 18 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Browser marketshare

Allow me to explain my edit to Template:Browser marketshare. I noticed that the median values of the chart in the article Usage share of web browsers varied widely compared to their mean values, therefore the "Other" entry's percentage is currently derived from the median values of the named browsers. Since they vary so much compared to their mean values the "Other" entry would be rendered meaningless if the medians added up to more than 100% (which they don't at present but they could). The mean values on the other hand produce an "Other" entry value that is the mean of the percentage of marketshare that is left over when you subtract the named browsers for all the sources thus giving a percentage that is always valid. If you disagree please tell me why.Thorenn (talk) 17:17, 26 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The chart values should use the median instead of the mean. This is true for at least two reasons (1) the number of sources is small and the median is less effected by outliers (2) we have no idea how the sources created their percentages in most cases, So median results in a more accurate estimation in this case. Also the reason the median and mean where so far off was because someone messed with the numbers. I re-looked at the sources and re-calculated. The result is both the mean an median very close. Next time send me a message before you change the chart (I'm the original creator). Jdm64 (talk) 10:09, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Nwtrek logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Nwtrek logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Click23 (talk) 22:22, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Wikiolap! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

Alexander Mirzayan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Veronika Dolina - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:David Ionovich Bronstein.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:David Ionovich Bronstein.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:37, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Efim Geller.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Efim Geller.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:52, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Alexander Nevsky Bridge.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Alexander Nevsky Bridge.jpg, which you've sourced to http://www.flickr.com/photos/veta/70001304/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 22:03, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute resolution for Usage share of operating systems

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Usage share of operating systems, Usage share of web browsers". Thank you. --Jdm64 (talk) 00:47, 11 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal

As advised by ItsZippy at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard‎, applied to Mediation Cabal. — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 00:42, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mediation Cabal: Request for participation

Dear Wikiolap: Hello. This is just to let you know that you've been mentioned in the following request at the Mediation Cabal, which is a Wikipedia dispute resolution initiative that resolves disputes by informal mediation.

The request can be found at Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/13 November 2011/Usage share of operating systems.

Just so you know, it is entirely your choice whether or not you participate. If you wish to do so, and we'll see what we can do about getting this sorted out. At MedCab we aim to help all involved parties reach a solution and hope you will join in this effort.

If you have any questions relating to this or any other issue needing mediation, you can ask on the case talk page, the MedCab talk page, or you can ask the mediator, thehistorian10, at their talk page. MedcabBot (talk) 20:59, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:Luspekaev Vereshagin.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Luspekaev Vereshagin.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:06, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Trinity Bridge St Petersburg.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Trinity Bridge St Petersburg.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 14:25, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Adcenter promo.gif)

Thanks for uploading File:Adcenter promo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:05, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Fauntleroy Park (Seattle)

The article Fauntleroy Park (Seattle) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable park

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Weihang7 (talk) 14:42, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Yuri Vizbor.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Yuri Vizbor.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:36, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cougar mountain zoo logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cougar mountain zoo logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:07, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cougar mountain zoo logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cougar mountain zoo logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:28, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Cougar mountain zoo logo.gif

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Cougar mountain zoo logo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:15, 24 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Excellent article on Search engine! Dape13 (talk) 08:48, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]