User talk:WikiTG99
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, WikiTG99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
{{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. |
---|
|
|
Happy editing! Peaceray (talk) 17:05, 10 January 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Raegan Revord (March 4)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raegan Revord and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, WikiTG99!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 18:29, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: One Mega Group (April 4)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:One Mega Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
"Quail, quail, quarry" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]The redirect Quail, quail, quarry has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 July 25 § Quail, quail, quarry until a consensus is reached. Rusalkii (talk) 21:20, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hi WikiTG99. Thank you for your work on Finger on the App. Another editor, Sebbog13, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
Article is well sourced. The topic is clearly notable. Multiple indepth, reliable, secondary sources written in 2020 and 2021. There are some mixed sources in terms of reliability. The article also had original research, which is when an editor writes their own opinion or what they perceive as factual without having a source backing it up. However I think I removed most of it.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Sebbog13}}
. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)