User talk:Wikchacap

October 2021

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Bulgarians, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain why? I think you have made a mistake Wikchacap (talk) 16:51, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 16:54, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, can you explain why my edit was once again erased, I think you have made a mistake. The paragraph said that “Bulgarians are ethnic Slavs native to Bulgaria”, that does not make sense because Slavs are not native to Bulgaria. It is more correct to to say that “Bulgarians are ethnic Balkans which are native to Bulgaria” which supports the statement and idea that they are native. I am trying to improve Wikipedia, not harm it. Adding a source has nothing to do with this. Wikchacap (talk) 16:57, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So if I add a source will that finally be acceptable? Wikchacap (talk) 17:46, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 05:00, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]