Jump to content

User talk:Waxilo

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sake Challenge (October 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bobby Cohn was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Waxilo! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Bobby Cohn (talk) 21:50, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
My deepest sympathy for your loss.
Sincere Condolences
Waxilo Waxilo (talk) 11:28, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sake challenge has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sake challenge. Thanks! Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

October 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello Waxilo. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Waxilo. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Waxilo|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because you never answered on my talk page, irrespective of the logo and copyright permissions, can you confirm the nature of your relationship with the subjects you are writing about on Wikipedia? Thank you, Bobby Cohn (talk) 17:15, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Bobby Cohn,
Thank you! I am actually a Sake Sommelier and have judged several sake competitions in different countries for the Sake Sommelier Association.
For this article, my goal is to inspire people to fall in love with sake and develop a new passion for it. Regarding the logo, I will ask them if I can use it, or I might choose not to include any logo in the article. Waxilo (talk) 17:39, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sake challenge (December 18)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 00:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Alpha,
I reduced article and unnecessary links please do let me know if is ok now
thank you Waxilo (talk) 17:37, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sake challenge (January 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:39, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Dan,
Thank you for your constructive comment. I have added more details to my article to improve the explanation.
Please let me know if this works for you.
Thank you. Waxilo (talk) 17:13, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sake challenge (January 7)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:07, 7 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]