User talk:Watti Renew

Article focus

Hi Watti Renew, and thanks for starting the article on deforestation in PNG. You might have noticed I trimmed it a bit, as it is important to keep it focused on the topic. If readers wish to know more about different aspects of the topic they can follow the wikilinks to related articles. For instance in the case of the PNG location map, this is something to be found in the PNG article, while the deforestation article should illustrate deforestation. I think the article needs something like this, maybe with an insert of the 2000 situation in between, but would need somebody to draw one. Maybe someone in the Map workshop could help. --Elekhh (talk) 22:48, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Good idea. Watti Renew (talk) 14:47, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Tea

WP:Tea (",) 99.119.130.203 (talk) 02:29, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you 99.119.130.203. I will discuss this with Arthur Rubin [1]:

Climate change in the United States EPA's website provides information on climate change: EPA Climate Change. Climate change is a problem that is affecting people and the environment. Human-induced climate change has e.g. the potential to alter the prevalence and severity of extremes such as heat waves, cold waves, storms, floods and droughts. Watti Renew (talk) 14:51, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See history of Special:Contributions/Arthur_Rubin ... Be aware that User:Arthur Rubin (Arthur Rubin) hides/deletes other's Talk, such as May 19th on User Talk:Zodon http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Zodon&diff=429845197&oldid=429841834 ... on March 30th 2011 it was User talk:Granitethighs http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Granitethighs&diff=prev&oldid=421531277 and User talk:OhanaUnited http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:OhanaUnited&diff=421531280&oldid=421528249 These are related to Template:Sustainability and Sustainability (and related topics). 99.181.147.115 (talk) 00:00, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion

Check for sources more current than Climate Change Science Program, regarding Talk:Climate change in the United States. 99.119.129.16 (talk) 00:46, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not the right venue

You should already be very familiar with my position: it is not that population is not an important issue, but that it already receives all the coverage it can bear in a general overview article on the United States that if anything needs to be pared down, not crammed with more data. For those particularly interested in this specific topic, the overview country article leads to many detailed topical articles. While I'm sure you are acting in good faith, you might care to pay a bit more attention to what other people here have to say—like our fellow editors Golbez and Chipmunkdavis, who have supported the view I have expressed and largely rejected yours.

At any rate, our respective Talk pages are not the appropriate venue for further debate on this matter. If you feel the need to continue this discussion, please do so on the article's Talk page, where other editors can continue to weigh in, and perhaps you can start to acquire a better feel for the broader issues that affect the article's maintenance and development. Best regards.—DCGeist (talk) 18:31, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DCGeist we may agree with Wikipedia:Negotiation Objective criteria such as accuracy, reliability, and appropriate representation of all significant points of view should be used as participants in a dispute work toward solutions.

I agree with you, this should be discussed in page Talk:United States#Population of the US, not here or User talk:DCGeist# Talk:United States#Population of the US) The discussed deletion is: Population in the United States increased from 1990 to 2008 with 54 million and 22 % growth in population and table: REF: CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion Population 1971-2008 IEA (pdf pages 83-85

Population in the United States
Year	Million
1971	207.7
1980	227.7
1990	250.2
2000	282.4
2004	293.3
2008	304.5

Watti Renew (talk) 17:43, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Exporting energy ?

Hi Watti, regarding the article Energy in Turkey, I couldn't quite understand the column Export in the table. ( Import ?) Happy editting. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 11:30, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nedim Ardoğa, correct, should be import. Thanks! Fixed. You are welcome to develop the article: Energy in Turkey. Watti Renew (talk) 16:22, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Templete:Population of the largest cities of the United States

The article Templete:Population of the largest cities of the United States has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is not a template, the title is misspelt and there is already a List of United States cities by population.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. S_peakF_ree ^(talk)_(contribs) 14:55, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NEW NAME HERE: Template:Population of the largest cities of the United States. See also: Talk:United States#Template:Population of the largest cities of the United States. Watti Renew (talk) 14:43, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Demographics of Australia

No problem, everybody makes mistakes :-)

I have some opinions about population, but I generally try to avoid getting into long discussions about my personal views on Wikipedia. It's quite appropriate for WP articles to report what reliable/notable sources have said about these issues, but it wouldn't be appropriate to add my own views/research to an article, so discussing them here wouldn't really be helpful to the project. I have a blog where I can talk about that stuff to my heart's content :-) --GenericBob (talk) 21:20, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks GenericBob. You see, I did not notice the typing error, since I could not realize the high annual population growth in Australia. Good point is that I would not be discussing about the article without the error. I am not really here to discuss my own views. But it is no problem to state it, if I had one. Now I would need more backgroud data in the article about Australian immigration policy to form an opinion. As it is now in my opinion, the human population growth as the world population is the key issue. This can be discussed on page: Talk:Demographics of Australia. Watti Renew (talk) 15:08, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Coal in Europe

The article Coal in Europe has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 20:30, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Coal in Europe for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coal in Europe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coal in Europe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 18:23, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Change in template

What is the value of this change? I ask because if it's very useful similar templates could use it. Cheers, Chipmunkdavis (talk) 20:50, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for asking. My intention was to link Energy in Africa, Energy in the Middle East and Energy in Europe in {{Middle East topic|Energy in}}, {{Africa topic|Energy in}} and {{Europe topic|Energy in}}. I did not succeed. Can you Help? Watti Renew (talk) 18:46, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The titles of the Africa and Europe templates already link to those pages. I've edited middle east to as well (although I don't know why the font is smaller). Is that all? Chipmunkdavis (talk) 19:04, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Chipmunkdavis! This gives a lot of additional value. It was complicated. It I tried to check it out but could not figure it out all yet. There is same problem with the population templates on pages: Demographics of Africa, Demographics of Europe, Demographics of Asia, Demographics of the United States, Demographics of South America and Demographics of North America. Watti Renew (talk) 14:29, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check out the templates on other pages. The Demographics of Africa template will not link to the Demographics of Africa page when already on that page. For example, if I put a link to [[User talk:Watti Renew]] here, it will just bold it without a link. Like so: User talk:Watti Renew. This prevents circular linking. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 14:45, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. I should have known this. :) Watti Renew (talk) 16:50, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions

Thank you for your contributions.

Some articles you might find of interest:

Be sure to check edit summary comments in View history and the Talk page of every article.

Happy Editing, 99.181.136.135 (talk) 17:23, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Individual and political action on climate change, Business action on climate change, and geoengineering are possibilities. 141.218.36.41 (talk) 22:44, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You may find Talk:Politics of global warming of interest. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 00:34, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Of interest?

User talk:99.54.138.81 99.181.130.155 (talk) 07:40, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Tibet – South Africa relations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tibet – South Africa relations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tibet – South Africa relations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Claret Ash 12:26, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please notice it is now a New Year party. Watti Renew (talk) 13:59, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Renewable energy navbox

Hi Watti, I wonder if you would care to comment at Talk:Renewable energy#RFC: Which navbox to use?. 00:00, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Finance scandal of election in 2007 in Finland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Defence Ministry

Jyri Häkämies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Defence Ministry

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Climate change in United Kingdom article?

I see that you have created the Climate change in Europe article. Any chance of doing a Climate change in the United Kingdom? Cheers. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 03:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alan Liefting. A good point. Yes, I will try a start if not started by someone else before. Wiki is free for everybody. Thanks for the suggestion. Watti Renew (talk) 18:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Guggenheim Helsinki –Plan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Rata, Tokio and Gerber

Göran J. Ehrnrooth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Gerber

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Watti Renew. You have new messages at Arctic.gnome's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Clarifiying the use of Sweden sources for Electricity sector in Norway and Energy in Germany

I change my previous comment. So you used Swedish documents to extract the data for non-swedish countries. I think it would be best to make this clearer. I made a clarifying change for Norway and Germany, but if you used that data elsewhere also, it would be good to have it there too.

For Norway, I do find the table would be easier to read if you'd list "Other RE" first, since that's by far the biggest production

I wonder if there would be a way to put that kind of data on wikimedia, and import it to various national wiki ?

Jmdwp (talk) 10:28, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Energy policy of the People's Republic of China (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to IEA

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Energy in Indonesia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to APRIL

Energy in the United Kingdom (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Total

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Palm oil: Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil

Hi Watti Renew, I see you recently added information to the Palm oil article. I left a request a little while ago on that article's talk page, and while part of it has been resolved, I am still looking for editors to review a draft I have suggested. I thought that maybe you would be willing to review my request here. I have proposed a new draft for the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil section. Please look it over if you have the time. Thanks in advance. YellowOwl (talk) 23:47, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have now not time to check the refs. I point out that in my opinion it makes not sence to compare palm oil to hydrogenated fat. Here you compare one basd to another bad. You should compare palm oil to natural oils with no trans fats which is the healthy alternative. I find it excellent that the health factors are included in the article. In Finnish ready meals there is no obligation to state if the vegetable oil is e.g. palm oil, sunflower oil or olive oil or other. This is not fare in my opinion based on different health effects. Watti Renew (talk) 12:37, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Europe’s Wind Energy Event

Tro2000 (talk) 12:30, 30 April 2013 (UTC) Hi Watti Renew, I would like to propose a large-scale edit / deletion of the === Europe’s Wind Energy Event === section of the European Wind Energy Association page. It does not make a lot of sense to have this section in the article, which is about EWEA only, not wind energy. The section would be more appropriate for the === Wind power in the European Union === article, which it is already linked to. If the section is supposed to be about EWEA 2013, the event which happened in Vienna in February 2013, that should be made clear.[reply]

Hi Tro2000, thanks for the idea. I support both/and -strategy since there is place and EWEA activity is linked to the event. Watti Renew (talk) 13:44, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

links EWEA, Wind power in the European Union Watti Renew (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing

This user has a long history of disruptive editing and POV-pushing in Finnish Wikipedia and has been blocked many times there. The habit seems to continue here in English Wikipedia. Recently, he/she added a long writing about Guggenheim and corruption to the Architecture section of Katajanokka article. Such thing clearly does not belong here, there is a separate article for that.

Watti has also added an off-topic chapter about corruption and Tapiola ~~Company~~ District to the Garden city movement article.

--ilaiho (talk) 14:26, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I filed an ANI entry about this case. --ilaiho (talk) 14:52, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion Katajanokka development concern also the page Katajanokka. I do not see the reason why this could not be in both pages. I support Both-and -strategy when there is not long articles. I find your attack very depressive at the same time as the Parliamentary Ombudsman investigation report poins out that Mr Gallen-Kallela-Sirén was not neutral in his position in respect to the Guggenheim Helsinki Plan. You have removed my addition from this article [2]. In my opinion it gives important additional information. The text may be changed, good argumentations for it, but the complete removal is not necessary or NPOV. Tapiola development has large media interest. It has been discussed also in the Financial Times in April. Therefore it needs clarification in Wikipedia. Watti Renew (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Finncial Times interview major Jukka Mäkelä. I point out that he is not elected by the citizens of Espoo and is not responsible for cirtizens of his decisions. Finland has same political system as in Russia, the politicians elect the town mayors. In Espoo conservative National Coalition Party has monopoly, that is they select among themselves the mayor of Espoo. In elections Jukka Mäkelä received about 3,000 votes. With these 3,000 votes he is mayor for ca 150,000 persons. Previous person Marketta Kokkonen did not take part in any elections. She was not living in Espoo when elected. Watti Renew (talk) 17:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry ilaiho, I could not find your ANI entry when I search it. Watti Renew (talk) 12:42, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to many questionaires majority would like to have direct election of the city mayors. This is one of the major political questions that could be proposed as a new law in the parliament by citizens. European Union has demanded the right to give law proposals for the citizens. Watti Renew (talk) 12:50, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The ANI entry has probably been archived. What it comes to the Katajanokka's Architecture section, it is not okay when an Architecture section has one paragraph about architecture and five paragraphs about corruption, tax havens and Guggenheim. Yes, many of your problematic additions could probably be fixed to be more NPOV, but that would be a terrible amount of work. These things have already been discussed many times at Finnish Wikipedia. You should write more neutrally and stay in scope.

It is perfectly justifiable to get angry about all that corruption and cronyism in Finland and in the world, but Wikipedia articles should be encyclopedic and stay in topic. --ilaiho (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. It is not my fault that the corruption is so extensive in Finland. Yet, most of the corruption news is still missing here. Please help also in it. The deletion of corruption facts is not in my opinion the best way to invite the new users. When the articles are in start there is a lot of work to do. Watti Renew (talk) 15:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have cleaned up after some of your edits, again, but I must say I agree with ilaiho that more often than not your edits seem to be focused only on adding criticism and certain narrow viewpoints. Remember that Wikipedia should be not used as a tool for political advocacy, even if you feel that those viewpoints are justified. --hydrox (talk) 23:02, 28 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:02, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You added material to the Guggenheim Museum article, but it is not clear what you meant, and the reference that you added does not appear to be easily verifiable. Can you please explain further on the article's Talk page? Thanks! -- Ssilvers (talk) 13:45, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reminding. All critics is removed! Watti Renew (talk) 16:14, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fortum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rolls-Royce (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 7 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed: Fortum signed an agreement with Rosatom and British Rolls-Royce Motor Cars that is a wholly owned English subsidiary of German automaker BMW to develop nuclear power in September 2013 Watti Renew (talk) 16:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:Climate change in the United States for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Orlady (talk) 14:59, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Second verse, same as the first. Your comments on Talk:Climate change in the United States are not about improving the article. I deleted them -- again. Please cease. --Orlady (talk) 00:21, 11 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orlady, I thank you for informing about the reference desk. I have many concerns.

WP:TALK: Editing—or even removing—others' comments is sometimes allowed. But you should exercise caution in doing so, and normally stop if there is any objection. Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments. Please revert the removal.

The article Climate change in the United States needs muck more clear information of the issues I pointed out in the talk page. This neeeds in my opinion place in the talk page. Discussion have been expressed in this purpose. [3] and [4] Watti Renew (talk) 17:44, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Corruption in Finland, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages NCC and VVO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Corruption in Finland (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to UPM

Finnforest (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Garden city

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:31, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation links

Neste Oil: Garden City: 23.10.2013
Neste Oil: IOI for IOI Group for the the Malaysian conglomerate of palm oil and and investor in the Marriott International international hotel company 23.10.2013
Wilmar International: IFC for International Finance Corporation, a member of the World Bank Group 23.10.2013 fixed
Wilmar International: WWF for World Wide Fund for Nature, a nature conservation organization 23.10.2013 fixed

Post–Kyoto Protocol negotiations on greenhouse gas emissions 11.11.2013 fixed
Kone price-fixing between 1995 and 2004 Otis Elevator Company and Schindler 1.11.2013
Corruption in Finland link Ilpo Kokkila major owned construction company SRV (company) fixed

14.12.2013

Crime in Finland link Elisa (company) 3.1.2014 fixed Watti Renew (talk) 12:08, 3 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WikiProject Mass surveillance

WikiProject Mass Surveillance
Dear, Watti Renew. We would like to invite you to join WikiProject Mass surveillance, a group of Wikipedians devoted to improving articles related to the privacy and global surveillance. If you're interested, consider adding yourself to the list of participants and joining the discussion on the talkpage.

-- HectorMoffet (talk) 14:05, 30 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shortcut

WP:SETEC

Thanks. I take this as a compliment that you appreciated my contribution. It encourage me to continue additions, when suitable. Watti Renew (talk) 17:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

link Global surveillance disclosures (2013–present) Watti Renew (talk) 09:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Guggenheim Helsinki Plan

Would you please comment here?: Talk:Guggenheim Helsinki Plan#Ehrnrooth again. -- Ssilvers (talk) 01:15, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Guggenheim Museum. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Be familiar with the guidelines and style
Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in an article, and include the "blue link" to that article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. atomicthumbs‽ (talk) 09:14, 16 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to Corruption in Argentina

Greetings Watti Renew, I noticed that you edit a lot of pages related to corruption and human rights. I spent the better part of the last two months creating the page for Corruption in Argentina, and I think it needs a fresh pair of eyes on it. Any chance you might be able to help?DaltonCastle (talk) 19:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks DaltonCastle, I take this as a compliment. I remember your invitation to Corruption in Argentina. Same time, I regret I have done so little for the Corruption in Finland. Watti Renew (talk) 16:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Carbon Bubble

Greetings and thank you for expandint the Carbon Bubble article. Keep up the good work! dmtk (talk) 14:55, 19 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

: Have Carbon Bubble burst?

here Carbon bubble Watti Renew (talk) 15:28, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Energy efficiency better link: Efficient energy use Corrected Watti Renew (talk) 16:55, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Your addition to Climate change in the United States has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Your added content was basically a copy/paste of sentences from the cited references. Vsmith (talk) 14:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The data [5] is from The Guardian with reference. My intention was to add a short summary of the public report as relevant for Wiki. Original source is a public report about the Climate change in the United States. Essential news should be included in the Wiki.

Only direct sentence was Climate change, once considered an issue for a distant future, has moved firmly into the present. The evidence is visible everywhere from the top of the atmosphere to the bottom of the ocean, it goes on. However, this is the key message of the public report. [6] [7] Watti Renew (talk) 11:30, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The New York Times has cited the same sentence plus others from the report. [8] (Watti Renew (talk) 11:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read here: Report Watti Renew (talk) 12:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Climate change in Finland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shell. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Neste, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Garden city. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Watti Renew. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Global Accounts

{{Admin help}}

User:Watti Renew is same as user Watti (that is fi:Käyttäjä:Watti) in other countries, like in Finland. I liked to keep the names but link User:Watti Renew to the Watti names abroad. Is it possible? English system did not accept the name Watti so I invented the longer one. I have had this User:Watti Renew name for years so I would liked to keep it. Can you help to link these? Watti Renew (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at m:Help:Unified login you might be able to rename your other accounts to Watti Renew. Admins here can't do anything. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:21, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ok Thanks Watti Renew (talk) 13:14, 26 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As in exhibit of Hans Haacke Guggenheim Museum does not approve critics of society. It is very serious for any museum. Critics include the real estate deals of Guggenheim.

-  Article Guggenheim Helsinki Plan: REAL ESTATE DEALS + THE ARTISTIC FREEDOM

User:Ssilvers you asked me to argument the Guggenheim museum critics and real estate deals [9]

According to Finnish Art magazine in 2008 German born Hans Haacke exhibition was censored by Guggenhein Museum in 1971. The exhibition included critics of the art museum connections including questionable real estate deals

- The artistic freedom is one of the main requirements and richness to creativity. According to Helsingin Sanomat in Russia artists have more restricted freedom to criticize the leadership and society than in Finland. Based on Hans Haacke, as in reference, Guggenheim Museum does not approve critics of society in conflict with its own interests. It is very serious for any museum. - Museum plan was in front of Presidential Palace, Helsinki and to be 100% financed by Finns. No other place was possible. Even if Finns had no interest to give this valuable place to this project, we could make the cultural exchange better the other way around. Ateneum, Finnish National Gallery, is excellent in art. I suggest that Washington, D.C. would give Finland equal size Museum, build it and pay all running costs in front of the White House in Washington D.C.. There many people could see artworks from Finnish artistic freedom.

In my opinion the critics deserves place in the article. Please add more info of Hans Haacke exhibition. Watti Renew (talk) 16:43, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I still do not understand how this material is related to the Guggenheim's Helsiniki proposals. Perhaps it belongs in some other article about Helsinki, or perhaps it does not belong in an encyclopedia, but in some kind of book or magazine. -- Ssilvers (talk) 17:31, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Message was intended in the page Guggenheim Helsinki Plan. I suggest we have main discussion there. The addition deserved place since no page is good or Neutral without critics. According to Naomi Klein in today’s politics several attacks may come simultaneously in order to scatter the public attention. Same time as the Guggenheim Helsinki Plan was International Climate Negotiations in December 2017 and the annual income report by Finnish Tax Authorities. In my opinion in Finland wealthy people do not boost with their wealth but would prefer low profile of it. Watti Renew (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017

Hello, I'm Caygill. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Sipilä_Cabinet seemed less than neutral to me.

Greetings fellow Finn. You seem to engage in systematic introduction of political bias into selected articles related to the current Finnish government. You give unjust weight to disputable and/or misrepresenting headline claims. You don't adhere to policies regarding biographical material of living persons (politicians related to the current government or parliament). I hope you could use your energy in a more constructive way. Caygill (talk) 19:57, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

According to Transparency International Finland director Prime Minister Juha Sipilä case will most likely reduce Finnish corruption index next year. (REF Sipilän tapaus voi heikentää sijoitusta Helsingin Sanomat 26.1.2017 A9 // Helsingin Sanomat is biggest news paper in Finland). WP:V People can check that the information comes from a reliable source. In my opinion it is not neutral to hide critics. [10] Watti Renew (talk) 13:37, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You are editing articles, which you probably have a sound understanding about. I'm happy to see these articles include just criticism, but only after they have the essential elements in place. You're behavior seems to indicate a pattern, where you browse Finnish government related (stubb-) articles and fill them with negative headline narratives. You know better, so please be more constructive. --Caygill (talk) 15:13, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I write mainly about Category:Energy by country, Category:Environmental issues by country, Category:Corruption by country and Category:Climate change by country. I agree Corruption in Finland needs more. I add links and more background to relevant articles, like this. Everybody are welcome to help. Watti Renew (talk) 16:44, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I find your addition about the Sipilä Cabinet's Traffic Policy to misrepresent facts and to be incorrect. I'll try to contribute a better one myself, since I find no pleasure in such conversations. --Caygill (talk) 08:22, 31 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Sipilä_Cabinet, you may be blocked from editing. I seriously suggest you stop what you're doing. You'll find a more neutral and balanced information on the subject in the left party opposition paper Kansanuutiset. Wikipedia is not a place for editorial work to argue for any one's political view. You seem to have no intention of respecting the community and its guidlines. Caygill (talk) 22:28, 1 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have references as required in the articles. In addition, interesting is not only what is written, but also what is not written. Discussion pages can be used to ask for more data of the issue. Here I would like more data about:

Have Sipilä government and/or Members of his Party received funding in relation to persons and organisation that benefit from Talvivaara Mining Company? When Talvivaara Mining Company started media found out that the family of environmental minister (same party) had significant stock ownership in the company.
How it is possible that the economic debts and environmental charges are split to another company in bankruptcy and company continues with another name without responsibilities of its past? Watti Renew (talk) 13:41, 4 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not your personal blog

Neutrality is the guiding principle of Wikipedia. If you feel the need to air your personal views and speculations on Finnish politics (like you did here), I suggest you do so in a blog. A Wikipedia article is not the place for that. --Jaakko Sivonen (talk) 20:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Climate change in Germany) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Climate change in Germany, Watti Renew!

Wikipedia editor Velella just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

In urgent need of expansion but matches similar articles from other countries

To reply, leave a comment on Velella's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:48, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Watti Renew. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2018

Hello, I'm Mélencron. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Finnish presidential election, 2018 seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mélencron (talk) 15:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Talk:Finnish presidential election, 2018

Watti Renew (talk) 12:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Watti Renew. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Aviation taxation and subsidies

The article Aviation taxation and subsidies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only a tiny fraction of the article is referenced, the rest is uncited "filler" as a WP:COATRACK to justify posting the few cited sentences criticizing the EU and Sweden. This material was previously rejected by consensus as unsuitable for the Aviation article, but it is no better here. Stubbing it to what is cited would result in an incomprehensible article. This article has been in existence for a week and is not being actively improved. It is better to just delete it and start over in the future when refs might allow a proper article to be written.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ahunt (talk) 17:58, 23 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Your addition to Environmental issues in the United Kingdom has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 17:37, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Climate change in the European Union, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Solar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Wind power in Malta

A tag has been placed on Category:Wind power in Malta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 01:47, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sex trafficking, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hilton and Intercontinental (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:49, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Climate Change Performance Index

Hey, I noticed you worked on the climate change performance index article. Would be useful to have a few tables to show exactly on how the index was calculated, and have up-to-date information available at wikipedia/wikidata. In particular:

table on current actual emissions per country participating in Paris agreement
table on allowed emissions per country participating in Paris agreement

This info can be put on a new wikipedia article containing the table, or directly placed at wikidata. Contact User:Bluerasberry if you prefer to include it to wikidata. --Genetics4good (talk) 10:44, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Population of the largest cities of the United States

Template:Population of the largest cities of the United States has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Izno (talk) 23:39, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]