User talk:Warchef

Thanks

Warchef: thanks for additions to Bob Dylan. You seem to know quite a lot. regards Mick gold 11:28, 24 June 2007 (UTC)

Curb Your Enthusiasm critical response

Why the hell should my opinion not be allowed on Curb wiki when there is a subjective referenced statement on the site under 'Critical response'?Stupid system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tomheppy100 (talk • contribs) 02:29, 18 October 2007 (UTC)

Dylan quotes

Hi Warchef. I notice you've added a Neil Young quote (in parenthesis). And you've suggested doing the same for the rest of the list. I have put into this list various references, for examples Andrew Motion's remarkable essay on Dylan, Springsteen's great compliment to Dylan, when inducting him into Rock'n'Roll Hall of Fame, David Bowie's 'Song To Dylan'. But I have done it via footnotes. If we put these direct quotes (in parenthesis) after each name, doesn't it all become rather unwieldy? best wishes Mick gold 15:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Now I loook at Dylan article again, you seem to have done something weird to the footnotes. The Springsteen ref has vanished, and all the other footnotes have become garbled. I shall see if I can fix! Mick gold 15:22, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Many thanks for fixing! & pax vobiscum :) Mick gold 16:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:The Golden Age Bobby Conn.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Golden Age Bobby Conn.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:52, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

Imaginationland‎ Merge

User:Sceptre has started to unilaterally merge the episodes together, not waiting until the poll has closed. As there is a 3:1 opinion out there that this should not occur and I do not wish to break the 3R rule I was wondering if you could help me with reverting his edits? Thanks. -- UKPhoenix79 23:53, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

Album galleries

Hi mate, sorry about the revert to the album gallery on the Gruff Rhys article. I'd created a few myself but someone's going through getting rid of the all - apparently it's ok to use album covers to illustrate the article on the the actual album because it's the "primary means of identification" but, because they're not free, they can't be used for purely illustrative purposes. Someone's also going through deleting album covers that don't have a specific rationale for each article they're used on which I take it you've noticed from the Disputed use comment for the Bobby Conn album cover. Cavie78 20:14, 10 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rise Up!.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Rise Up!.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 21:48, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Finnegan's Wake

I wrote the "explication" of the passage in the Wake that you deleted. It was meant as a guide for a new reader to extracting the imagery in the sentence, which someone pegged as obscure, but which was the first sentence in the book that I found particularly moving. There are no references becuase it is an obvious reading which only gets at the literal meaning, not at any allusions. I put it in to counter the absurd claim that the sentence is unreasonably obscure.

The passage reads "O here here how hoth sprowled met the duskt the father of fornicationists, but (O my shining stars and body) how hath fanespanned the skysign of soft advertisement" The explanations I gave were:

1. "here here" is heard as "hear hear" and also as a location
2. sprowled is sprawled/prowled.
3. duskt is dusk/dust.
4. that dust is an allusion to "dust to dust".
5. fornicationists are connected to dust/dusk through the forshadowing of night implicit in dusk and the forshadowing of death implicit in dust.
6. That "O my shining stars and body" is a poetic sentiment of the internal reality of a dream.
7. Fanespanned is "sacred spanning", originating in "fane".
8. that the skysign of soft advertisement references the stars once again.
9. That "hoth" and "hath" are symmetrically placed
10. that "sprowled" and "fanespanned" have opposite sentiments, sprowled is dark and fanespanned light.

I don't believe that any of these things are particularly controvertial, and if they are, just add the alternate readings. Most of these interpretations are in the Finnigan's Wiki, for example. The only purpose of the paragraph was to explain the literal content of the sentence, not to bring out any allusions, which don't interest me very much.

In my opinion, the difficult part of reading the wake is not any of the allusions, which are mostly obvious and not so illuminating, but following the imagery and narrative. Reconstructing the images is made easier by an explicated sentence. It would have been nice if you would have produced a gloss to replace the one you deleted instead of just deleting.Likebox (talk) 08:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

(respond to comments on my user page, which I will move to my talk page) I see your point about the arbitrariness, but that was not my doing--- the person who wrote the previous version put the sentence up as a particularly galling example of obscurity. Perhaps the whole part beginning with "many find the language confounding" including the sentence should be deleted?Likebox (talk) 20:04, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

I also see your point about the subject of the sentence being obscure, but I feel that I understand it nevertheless, despite the screwy syntax. I agree with your changes for the most part, I just don't want a new reader to feel that the Wake is hopelessly impenetrable. I felt that way for many years, and I missed out on the unique experience it provides. That's why I put a gloss in. Maybe it doesn't belong, I don't know. Good luck, and happy holidays!Likebox (talk) 20:07, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

You got me thinking about the subject of that sentence. I tend to think its a form of "he" or "He", the dreamer "he" or a divine "He", a blend of an individual sleeping mind with a universal mind, a mind that comprises both sentiments traditionally considered high and those traditionally considered low. I mean, I tend to read it now something like "here here how He/he hath sprowled ...(...body) how He/he hath fanespanned ...".Likebox (talk) 21:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Protest song

Thanks for your kind words. I'm afraid I'm busy with work over the christmas/new year period, but I shall think about what I might contribute. I've always been fascinated by Dylan because of the way his work evaded the normal limits of protest songs. In Chronicles, he writes about how he was first turned on by Brecht/Weill's Pirate Jenny, which obviously deals with injustice, and yet it isn't really a protest song. When I first heard Dylan in 1964, I had read in the papers that he wrote 'protest songs' yet the more I listened to Blowin' In The Wind, the less I could hear any protest. The ambiguous chorus line seems to say: either the answer is so obvious it's in your face; or the answer is as elusive and as impossible to grasp as the wind. And the issues the song addresses - wars, people oppressing people - are hardly unique to the 20th century. The song sounded to me more like a series of Biblical parables. The other thing I found intriguing about Dylan's work in the 1960s, is that you can search his entire song catalogue and you won't find the word Vietnam once. I think that's extraordinary when you think how Vietnam dominated the politics and the protests of that time. Think of Phil Ochs and Country Joe MacDonald. Obviously, Dylan knew at some deep level that the word Vietnam would date a song very quickly. My personal hunch is that Vietnam is embedded in John Wesley Harding, and in Senor, but that hardly makes them protest material. In Rolling Stone (17 May 2007) Jann Wenner asked Dylan if America was a force for good in the world today. And Dylan replied, "Human nature hasn't really changed in 3,000 years. Maybe the obstacles and the daily customs have changed, but human nature hasn't changed. It cannot change. It's not made to change." That kind of thinking sheds an interesting light on the whole concept of Protest songs. best wishes & a very merry christmas! Mick gold (talk) 15:00, 21 December 2007 (UTC)

Hi warchef, many thanks for your kind words. I’ve been very busy so haven’t had time to reply. Looking back on what I wrote above, I guess what I’m trying to say is: for me the significant thing about Dylan was that in the 1960s he was widely perceived to be part of a ‘protest’ movement. But looking back today, 40 years later, his work does not fit into that category. I mentioned how in 1964 all the papers told me ‘Blowin’ In the Wind’ was a protest song. Does anybody hear it that way today? On the cover of Freewheelin’ the notes explained how Dylan wrote ‘A Hard Rain’s A-Gonna Fall’ during the Cuban missile crisis, and he believed he would not have enough time to finish the song. So each line is the beginning of a new song. But today we know that Dylan sang the song more than a month before JFK’s TV address to the nation (October 22, 1962) initiated the Cuban missile crisis for most Americans. Who thinks of the Cuban misssile crisis when they hear it today? They are more likely to hear it as a song about ecological catastrophe, a warning about a poisoned planet. Hence its use over TV footage of Katrina. Hence the new version at Zaragoza about clean water.

When I try to think of which Dylan song sounds like a protest song today, I’m left with ‘Who Killed Davey Moore?’. It clearly names an injustice, and it fingers 5 or six people or groups as the guilty parties. But today it sounds like one of Dylan’s least interesting songs because it sounds limited. ‘Only A Pawn In their Game’ begins as though addressing an injustice (the murder of Medger Evers, a shocking event at the time) but ends by enacting a whole social process behind the injustice. Similarly ‘The Lonesome Death of Hattie Carroll’. (In a more abstract way, the same is true of ‘Percy’s Song’ which I think is very beautiful. At the beginning, it sounds as though Dylan is trying to right a wrong that was done to a friend, but by the end, it has become a song about how one comes to terms with injustice that cannot be righted.)

So I guess all I’m trying to say is that if I were writing about Dylan’s ‘protest’ phase I would say that he was perceived as part of this ‘protest movement’ in 1962 & 1963, but today he seems to have been addressing much wider issues all along, and thinking about themes of universality, while appearing to be inspired by newspaper headlines of the day. And by 1964, I think he’d left it all behind, and had decided that the injustices and the evil he was combating were things that could be found in Shakespeare and Dante and the Book of Exodus, and would not be resolved by protest marches, hence his aversion to the label of ‘protest music’. (‘I’m not There’ deals with this theme amusingly, I think.)

In the article Protest song I think ‘Masters of War’ is described as a song about the Vietnam War. But ‘Masters of War’ was written at beginning of 1963 (January or February) and no young person in February 1963 was protesting about US involvement in Vietnam. I think there were only a few hundred Green Berets in South Vietnam at the time. In July 1964, 5000 additional US troops were sent to Vietnam, bringing total troop levels to 21,000. The song came to seem like a comment on Vietnam in 1965 – when US planes bombed North Vietnam for the first time: “you that build the death planes”. Operation Rolling Thunder commenced March 2, 1965, another Dylan connection. Dylan has said ‘Masters of War’ was about the issues that Eisenhower talked about in his farewell address to the nation in 1960 when he spoke of the ‘military-industrial complex’. But because of the world we live in, when Dylan sang a particularly venomous version of that song at the Grammies in February 1991, as the first Gulf War got going, it sounded like it had been written for that moment. (In the same way, when Dylan toured the US in 1974, as the investigations into Watergate gathered momentum and looked increasingly likely to bring Nixon down, the line "but even the president of the United States sometimes must have to stand naked” sounded like it had been written for that moment.

I would certainly agree with your point that Dylan's songs were adapted & appropriated by the 'movement', rather than written for them. I wish I had more hours in the day to contribute to Protest song “But at my back I oft times hear time’s wingéd chariot drawing near”. Best wishes Mick gold (talk) 10:31, 19 January 2008 (UTC)

Warchef, a post script. I’m sorry my last comment was rather rambling and did not focus on the 4 points you left on my Talk page:

• his performance at the march on washington with baez, amid king et al. does place him firmly in the thick of things

Yes but even by August 1963, Dylan was less than 100% behind the idea that such huge mass demonstrations achieved anything. Scaduto (p. 151) has the interesting quote at the end of the March on Washington: “Think they’re listening?” Dylan asked, glancing towards the Capitol. “No, they ain’t listening at all.”

• his relationship with Seeger & Guthrie, and the huge influence they had on his art, places him very firmly in the American protest-folk tradition of the early 20th century, however little these influences might have manifested themselves directly in his lyrics (always felt Dylan belongs much more to this tradition than to that of his contemporaries; that he agreed with the former's emphasis on realistic social injustices rather than the latter's abstract notions of "love and peace", but that's always open to debate)

Agree that Dylan did not express any vague sentiments about love & peace. Pete Seeger’s enthusiasm for topical song-writing was obviously a huge catalyst for Dylan in 1962. ‘The Death of Emmett Till’ and ‘Who Killed Davey Moore?’ fitted the topical agenda. This phase did not last longer than a year.

• it's probably more true to say that his songs were adopted by the movement rather than being written for it (however, one or two exceptions such as "Masters of War', "Oxford Town", "Hattie Carroll" could be argued to be actual "protest songs" - whatever they are)

Agreed. But ‘Oxford Town’ is very sardonic & oblique. It has no message except “Somebody better investigate soon”. As suggested above, ‘Hattie Carroll’ becomes a more general indictment of justice.

• he rather forcefully distanced himself from the protest movement -

Agreed. The date is December 13, 1963, when he made his speech to the Emergency Civil Liberties Committee and said: “There’s no black and white, left and right to me any more; there’s only up and down, and down is very close to the ground.” (The full transcript is in Shelton, p.200 and there’s a long quote in Scorsese’s film.)

best wishes Mick gold (talk) 16:01, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Regarding the New Show entry

I'd like to thank you for starting The New Show page back in June. I was/am a big fan of the show. I happen to have old videotapes of 8 of the episodes, so I have gone through each of them and summarized the casts and sketches and have updated the page with this information. The episode that the SCTV website states aired on Jan 27, 1984 likely did not air on that date as per TV Guide entries, but due to the detail of that SCTV website I'm sure the show aired and I just didn't tape it at the time. Between the air dates of 06JAN-23MAR1984 there were only 12 possible time slots, with 2 I believe being pre-emptions. I have 8 episodes on tape and described, there's the other one about Teri Garr, and I'm not sure if there was a 10th. Do you happen to have any of these other shows on tape? I have seen an amazon.com entry for The New Show DVD but it doesn't look like it was released. It's possible that it's on hold. My speculation would be that if there is a DVD, it would only have "the best of" sketches. As a personal opinion, I feel the best sketches were anything with John Candy, since he seemed to just be made for this type of sketch comedy show. "Roy's Food Repair", "Mountain Mike", "Time Truck" were really brilliant. RickLangston (talk) 03:05, 22 January 2008 (UTC)RickLangston

Dylan & Protest song

Hi Warchef, I like the way you've bee re-writing the protest song page, and adding references and quotes from Marqusee et al. It's a big improvement. I have had time recently to re-write the Wikipedia page on The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan which I've aways felt was one of his best albums. best wishes Mick gold (talk) 08:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Good work on NCfOM

Thanks for your excellent contributions at No Country for Old Men (film).
Jim Dunning | talk 15:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Neon Neon

Much respect for creating the Neon Neon page, great job on it too. I was surprised to see no page for it so I attempted starting it but became disheartened fairly quick. Fair play! User:Phantompie

Finnegans Wake

Hi,

I appreciate your efforts to bring clarity and sanity to the appallingly overwritten Finnegans Wake article and I just wanted to volunteer for more editing on it. I have taken a scalpel to the intro and I think improved it. I agree with Gaff that this article could be FA-status one day and I think I know how it can be done. Your contributions were all in the interests of making the subject more lucid and I think that's the only way to go. Hope you're interested. Lexo (talk) 23:31, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

• Hi,

I didn't mean to downplay all your hard work, sorry if I gave that impression. As an article, it has loads of good references and tons of information. Too much, in fact. Some of it reads like people are trying to cram all of Ellmann into an article on one book. I have gone through the Background and the first section of the Plot Summary and been fairly ruthless about cutting and reshaping stuff that seems to me either excessively detailed or just plain ugly. Always amazed by how some English grads can't write English - many passive constructions (in the year such-and-such a something-or-other was written by so-and-so), much sloppy and inconsistent punctuation. Not you of course. :) See what you think.

I would quite like to propose that in the interests of consistency we use the word 'book' rather than 'novel' throughout the article when referring to the Wake. It seems to me that the Wake transcends the novel genre, plus it was the word Joyce preferred. But if you prefer 'novel', I'm cool with that. It would be good to be consistent, though. Lexo (talk) 15:42, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, sorry, after all my huffing and puffing about improving the article I then went off on holiday and was without internet access for three weeks, and dropped the whole thing. I came back to find that the Background section appeared to have deteriorated stylistically; commas strewn about the place like discarded socks, ugly sentence construction. Had a go at improving it. (Do college students just keep fiddling with it or what?)

I ordered and finally received today a copy of Our Exagmination to replace the one I'd sold years ago, and also because if we are going to make it a better article it seems wise to review some of the initial criticism of it. Plot synopses of any work of fiction always have to be representative of some kind of authoritative or critical consensus about what the book is about. If you synopsise the Iliad and leave out the death of Patroklos, you do violence to the story. The big problem here is that there's such violent disagreement among the authorities about what the Wake is about, or whether you can synopsise it at all. How do we do it without violating WP: original research? That's the question. Lexo (talk) 11:57, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi again - I haven't finished reading Kitchner, unfortunately. Apart from being busy with work I became suddenly interested in two subjects fairly distant from FW, namely Ancient Greek and the history of Sparta, and all my reading lately has been on those topics. But one of the things I have got from Kitchner is his belief (I hesitate to call it his "theory") that the 'real' characters in the book, the closest it comes to a grounding in everyday reality, are Mr and Mrs Porter who by K's account are dreaming everybody else - HCE is 'really' Mr Porter, ALP is Mrs Porter's dream about herself and so on. I have to say, I reread that section of the Wake (when they wake up and try to put the kid back to sleep) with this in mind and I am almost persuaded, perhaps because I have a 15-month-old girl and my wife and I are familiar with all the half-sleep you get around young children. Anyway, I'd better finish reading K's book before I report anything definitive. Nice to read Our Exag again although Beckett's essay seems more arrogant, annoying, immature and unhelpful than ever. Lexo (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2008 (UTC)

I now realise, having gone through some of the stuff myself, that Kitcher is not the first person to regard the Porters as being the 'real' characters of FW. But I am trying to come to this article not so much as a FW expert but as a good editor, who happens to have some knowledge of the difficulties involved in writing a decent article on this particular subject. Incidentally, I have a copy of Scribbledehobble, the Thomas Connolly-edited supposed "ur-workbook" to FW. Do you have any idea how useful it would be to try and incorporate stuff from this book into the article? Lexo (talk) 22:15, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the Novels WikiProject

Hi, and welcome to the Novels WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to fiction books often referred to as "Novels".

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated quite regularly. You can watch it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WikiProject_Novels_announcements}} there.
  While you are updating your userpage, don't forget our userbox {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User WPNOVELS}}.
• The project has a monthly newsletter; it will normally be delivered as a link, but other methods are available.

There are a variety of interesting things to do within the project; you're free to participate however much—or little—you like:

• Starting some new articles? Our article structure guidelines / template outlines some things to include.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the members, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! – Liveste (talk • edits) 03:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

Dylan FARC

Hi Warchef, I've added another defence of Bjorner, with contribution from Michael Gray. Let's see whether this says the powers-that-be. Please don't remove any more Bjorner refs until we get a verdict. If you agree with what I'm trying to say about Bjorner, pls feel free to add a comment.

I took what you said about the focus of the Dylan article seriously. I think we have removed cruft & shortened the article & improved the refs, so FAR has done us good. But (as I said on Talk page) I'm concerned we don't lose sight of what makes Dylan an extraordinary 20th & 21st century artryist. I'm not v sophisticated at assessing word count of "readability" megabytes, but Dylan article is now 120 kilolobytes, Ronald Reagan is 145 kilobytes (and, like Dylan, a figure of massive importance in 20th century history) so Dylan is not the longest article by a long way.

How do you feel about progress of Dylan FAR so far? I still feel uneasy because I don't know what may hit us next, or how they will respond to the defence of Bjorner. As a result of this controversy, Bjorner sent me an email saying he appreciated this discussion of his work in Wikipedia. He also said he was now working as a consultant and historical advisor to the official Bob Dylan website in New York, but he wants to keep this info out of public discussion. Hope all goes well in Vienna. (My parents came from Vienna as refugees from the Anschluss so I've always been interested in history of the place, and have managed to make a couple of documentaries about it.) best wishes Mick gold (talk) 10:11, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - October 2008

• Newsletter delivery by xenobot 13:26, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Dylan legacy

Thanks for being bold & starting Dylan legacy. I was trying to think about legacy but you jumped in first, well done. I fear a couple of your footnotes/links don't work: Strummer, Sounes, and one other quote. I tried to fix but couldn't. Mick gold (talk) 14:03, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Dylan: who vs. whom

Hi, Warchef. Your revert of "who" in the Hurricaine Carter sentence is understandable. The syntax of this sentence, otherwise excellent, makes it difficult to see whether to use "who" or "whom." So if I start sounding like Grammar Lady, please bear with me.

Speaking of whom, the Grammar Lady http://www.aacton.gladbrook.iowapages.org/id3.html and others offer this advice on who vs. whom: Try substituting "he" or "him" for "who" or "whom." Given that the sentence says "Dylan championed Carter, (who or whom) he believed had been wrongfully accused" our choices are "he, Dylan believed, had been wrongfully accused" and "him, Dylan believed, had been wrongfully accused." Since "him" isn't right, "who" is the answer.

The "he believed" in the ending phrase is what makes the choice especially difficult, because it sounds like "Dylan believed Carter," whereas what's being said is: "Dylan believed (that) Carter had been wrongfully accused." And if that's not true to the original sentence, this is: "Dylan championed Carter, who had been wrongfully accused." Interjecting "he believed" doesn't change the choice of pronouns.

Phew. All this over a four letter word. Anyway, please consider reverting your revert. And if I haven't won you over, try seeking a third opinion from an English teacher or librarian, who I am certain will find in favor of this sentence as well as the above :)). Allreet (talk) 18:51, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Bjorner

Hi Warchef, Thanks for your nice note—your sentiment about Dylan editing is mutual. I'll talk about Viennese stuff in an email. Just wanted to respond on Bjorner. Obviously I've argued that if Bjorner is authoritative source for Gray & Muir, we have a right to regard him as authoritative too. Allreet agreed and seconded that argument. You commented that the cover versions of Knockin' on Heaven's Door were better in the Bjorner version, and I agree, I'd like to reinstate it. The first time I cited Bjorner was the recording sessions of John Wesley Harding. You replaced that ref with weblinks for McCoy, Buttrey, & Drake, (which is fine) but it occurred to me that these 3 musicians are credited on the back of the album, so that is a sufficient WP:RS. One Bjorner ref that I like and cannot see a substitute for is Dylan's evangelical speech quoted: "Years ago they said I was a prophet.." I think it's a great quote, contrasts the mythic status of 1960s Dylan with his new-found humility before Jesus. I even looked in the little book of Gospel Speeches that Heylin edited, thinking I could substitute that, but Heylin hasn't got that speech. I know it's accurate cos I once heard a recording of that concert. Everything in Bjorner is accurate. I've seen stories about Dylan in The Times and on the BBC News site that were inaccurate but Bjorner is accurate. So my position is if Bjorner survives this FAR, we use him. best wishes :) Mick gold (talk) 23:05, 11 October 2008 (UTC)

Coosan

you said you live on the shores of L.Ree? could you help out with this? Coosan Zu Anto 13:01, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Vote early, vote often

Hi Warchef. Marskell suggests it's time to vote at Dylan FAR. Mick gold (talk) 22:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your Keep but I think you forgot to sign it :-) Mick gold (talk) 23:25, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - November 2008

This newsletter was automatically delivered by TinucherianBot (talk) 05:31, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Finnegans Wake

Hi. I'm doing the GA review on Finnegans Wake. I'll be putting my comments here: Talk:Finnegans Wake/GA1. You can ask me any questions at any time. Regards. SilkTork *^YES! 02:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

I've put the review on hold until the end of Jan to allow you time to address the issues I've raised. Let me know how you get on, and if you have any concerns about what I've said in the review. Regards SilkTork *^YES! 16:28, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

Finnegans Wake is a Good Article

Well done. Splendid work. You have worked with a fine spirit throughout and never lost your patience with my quibbles. Warm regards and much respect. SilkTork *^YES! 17:01, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Excellent! Thanks a million for all your help and sage advise, I can honestly say that the article is infinitely the better for having gone through the GA process, and especially for having received your excellent analysis. It was a pleasure :) peace Warchef (talk) 17:32, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Sometimes things work out well, and sometimes they don't. In this case we worked well together, and I'd put that down to your profound knowledge of the subject, an excellent work ethic, an ability to actually write well (unfortunately not that common on Wikipedia!), and your gentle patience with my petty quibbles. What are you going to work on next? SilkTork *^YES! 17:50, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Finnegans Wake

		The Original Barnstar
		For working like a madman to bring Finnegans Wake to Good Article status. — Malik Shabazz (talk · contribs) 19:10, 13 February 2009 (UTC)

Congratulations, here comes everybody

	The Working Wikipedian's Barnstar
	For detailed referencing of a complex subject, for shining wiki-light into labyrinthine work & illuminating dark dream-like spaces. Mick gold (talk) 19:32, 21 February 2009 (UTC)

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - March 2009

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 17:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Move Survey: Your Opinion is Requested

I Seek To Help & Repair! (talk) 21:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - Coordinator Election

Hello. To begin, every member of WikiProject Novels will be getting this message (the joy of macros) so if you wish to get in touch with me, please post a message on my talk page. I would encourage anyone who so wishes, to stand in the Coordinator Elections. If you wish to stand, please do so by 23:59pm, June 27. Voting will the continue to 23:59pm, July 21. Can everyone please check-out the Coordinator Elections page. Also, the collaboration of the month is The Tin Drum, so if you have any spare time, please check it out. And I apologise to the seven of you for whom this will be a repeat message. Regards, Alan16 (talk).

Coordinator Election

Hello. The Coordiantor Election has begun. All members are encouraged to vote by the deadline, July 28. To vote simply add support to the comments and questions for.. section of the member of your choice.

3 users are standing:

• Alan16 (talk · contribs)
• Kevinalewis (talk · contribs)
• Pmlinediter (talk · contribs)

Regards, Alan16 (talk) 19:45, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

The WikiProject Novels Newsletter - July 2009

The July 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16(talk)

WikiProject Novels - Narnia Task Force

Hi! You would be glad to know that a new wikipedia ad has been created by Srinivas to encourage users to join Chronicles of Narnia Task Force. You can display that ad on your user/talk page too using the following code: {{Wikipedia ads|ad=190}}

Wikipedia ads	file info – #190

-- Alan16 (talk) 10:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels - August 2009 Newsletter

The August 2009 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you. Alan16 (talk) 17:39, 22 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Warchef! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 17 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Tom Gammill and Max Pross - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 07:52, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

==New WikiProject Novels initiative

We have begun a new initiative at the WikiProject Novels: an improvement drive. As a member listed here, you are being notified. Please see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels#5-5-5 Improvement Drive and Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Collaboration for more details. Also I would like to remind you to keep an eye on the project talk page at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Novels. Thanks, Sadads (talk) 01:48, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February

Thank you everyone who participated in the January Collaboration, it was quite a success with 5 new C class articles, 3 stub kills and several articles were removed from our backlogs. In support of the Great Backlog Drive, the WikiProject Novels Collaboration for February is going to help remove backlog candidates in the backlogs related to WikiProject Novels. Please join us, and help us wikify, reference, clean up plot sections and generally improve Novels content, Sadads (talk) 21:29, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

You are recieving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Novels according to Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Members

Finnegans Wake in Spanish

Hi Warchef, I'm translating the Finnegans Wake article into Spanish. I think you've done a really good work and I'd like to send you my congratulations. Best wishes. Pedro Felipe (talk) 15:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bobby Conn live in Zurich.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

• File:Bobby Conn live in Zurich.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 10:48, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Passionfruit Theatre

The article Passionfruit Theatre has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-profit organisation that seemingly existed between 2005 and 2013, and (in that time) doesn't appear to have generated more than trivial coverage that would seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:NONPROFIT. On GNG, I cannot find much more than trivial "event listings", or bios in local papers (on those associated with the theatre) in which the theatre/company itself is not the main topic. On NONPROFIT, the scope of the theatre company's activities do not appear to be national or international in scale.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Guliolopez (talk) 23:24, 7 September 2019 (UTC)