User talk:Wahreit

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	Thank you for your work on the Battle of Shanghai article. Alexysun (talk) 16:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

And other related articles. Alexysun (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you, alexysun Wahreit (talk) 17:05, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the adachi guy challenge

Based on your efforts to edit the Sihang Warehouse article, is it safe for me to assume you believe Robinson's claims that the IJA 3rd Division was involved in the battle for the warehouse and the Japanese suffered 200 troops KIA in the ensuing battle?

If so, I propose a fun zero stakes challenge to you. Please find:

I) a source that conclusively proves the IJA 3rd Division or any IJA Unit for that matter was involved. A primary Japanese language source is preferred but you are welcome to use whatever.

II) the name and unit of at least one of the 200 supposed KIA troops excluding IJN Warrant Officer Tanaka who has already been confirmed.

I wish you luck good sir. Adachi1939 (talk) 05:31, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

if you want a proper dialogue, this is not a very mature way to open it, so i'm going to ignore your last part, but i will answer the first question. Yes, I have a copy of Stephen Robinson's book. furthermore, I don't really see anyone "debunking" robinson on the sihang warehouse page, and even there was a valid argument there that wouldn't mean much because wikipedia is a volunteer site, not a scholarly source. Robinson is an accomplished historian with several books to his name and two degrees, I'll trust his credentials over a wikipedia talk page. Wahreit (talk) 05:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for the reply. I will take that as a no for the adachi guy challenge. It would have been a good way for you to explore more sources and see why you are wrong.

I already covered the issues with Robinson's book on talk page for the Defense of Sihang Warehouse months ago.

>Stephen Robinson does claim in his work "Eight Hundred Heroes: China's lost battalion and the fall of Shanghai" that the IJA 3rd Division was involved in the assault on Sihang Warehouse but does not provide proper citations for the passages where he wrote such claims.

Robinson even cites Niderost's article "Chinese Alamo: Last Stand at Sihang Warehouse" for some claims which is quite literally has no citations. Sorry but no "accomplished historian" is going to so easily write an entirely wrong force engaging in a battle and cite an article with no sources. Degrees become irrelevant when you throw basics of academia out the window. Even a high schooler should know not to cite a random secondary source article with no sources of its own for a book report.

As it stands there are some serious issues with the sources you deem as credible. Adachi1939 (talk) 06:13, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

not at all. for one, it isn't just robinson's work who claims the 3rd division was involved, and two, your personal issues with the book do not disqualify its usage as a secondary source. in addition, it isn't my opinion that the 3rd division was involved, earlier versions of the sihang warehouse article indicate the same. it isn't up to you to determine the whether or not others can use certain sources, because as you indicated in the name of this topic, you are a "guy," just another editor. your opinion is obviously valued, but it holds no weight over anyone elses. Wahreit (talk) 18:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give you a more detailed reply in the talk page on the Battle of Shanghai article. Adachi1939 (talk) 21:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RfC about the the IJA 3rd Division, Defense of the Sihang Warehouse, and the Battle of Shanghai

I have opened a request for comment in regards to your contributions on the Sihang and Battle of Shanghai articles and use of unreliable sources to assert the IJA 3rd Division's involvement at the warehouse. It would be greatly appreciated if you wait until a third opinion is provided before trying to majorly overhaul the content of either article again. Adachi1939 (talk) 22:02, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

check the message left on your talk page. we're pretty concerned for you. Wahreit (talk) 21:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello Wahreit and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you are interested, or you can add it directly to your user page by copying the following: {{WPMILHIST Announcements}}.
The project Academy has lots of useful information about editing and writing military history articles. One very useful introductory course to get you started is Writing a good stub.
Important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, and article logistics.
We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
We've developed a set of guidelines that cover article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention, as well as a number of review alerts.
If you would like to receive the project's monthly newsletter, The Bugle, please sign up here.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask any of the project coordinators or any other experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome, and we are looking forward to seeing you around! Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 11:54, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Chinese control of Manchuria

Hi Wahreit. I wanted your help in reviewing the accuracy of a statement. In the interwar period page there is a sentence that states "In September 1931, the Japanese Kwantung Army—acting on its own without government approval—seized control of Manchuria, an anarchic area that China had not controlled in decades."

I'm pretty sure that the part about "not controlled in decades" is inaccurate or historical revisionism, because I know for a fact that Zhang Xueliang was a powerful warlord there. What are your thoughts? Alexysun (talk) 18:51, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it looks to me you're right. Manchuria was controlled in the late 1920s by Zhang Zuolin, who was allied with Japanese interests but still maintained his own autonomy until the Kwangtung army assassinated him. his son Zhang Xueliang was absolutely anti-Japanese, and the main reason as to why he was unable to stop the 1931 invasion was because his forces were away in the south participating in the Central Plains War. anarchic is a pretty inaccurate way of describing the rule of the Zhangs too, because there was definitely an acting authority in control of Manchuria. if anything, Manchuria was one of the wealthiest regions in warlord era china before the Japanese invasion. all in all, the sentence seems inaccurate. Wahreit (talk) 21:44, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wahreit Thank you for your fast reply. I will go ahead and change that sentence. Alexysun (talk) 17:36, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wahreit Any book recommendations btw? Alexysun (talk) 09:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

unfortunately not so much for the warlord period, but i can rec jay taylor's the generalissimo as it sheds some light on the northern expeditiion and late warlord period. Wahreit (talk) 16:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Wahreit Thanks for the rec. You can ping me next time haha. I didn't come back to check for updates until now. Alexysun (talk) 01:32, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators' noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your continued attempts to falsify history on the Sihang Warehouse article Adachi1939 (talk) 04:57, 26 August 2024 (UTC). The thread is User:Wahreit. Thank you.[reply]

cool. Wahreit (talk) 04:02, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

The dispute can be viewed here: Adachi1939 (talk) 21:14, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thinking

Do you think the Soviet invasion of Manchuria/Manchukuo is part of the 2nd Sino-Japanese War? I mean it’s called “Sino-Japanese” but really it was tied heavily to the Pacific theater too and the Soviet invasion of Manchukuo even more. If so then should the Soviets be added to the Infobox for 2nd Sino-Japanese War, with 1945 in parenthesis? It’s already there on the Chinese language article as well as a lot of other things. Basically I want an Infobox that covers context better. Alexysun (talk) 08:50, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

in my personal opinion, yes. the Soviets destroyed the kwangtung army and provided the communists a strong advantage in the civil war through captured japanese weaponry, which would equip large portions of mao's army. i do anticipate there might be some pushback, but if the chinese language article says so there is a case for it. Wahreit (talk) 16:42, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for coordinators is now open!

Nominations for the upcoming project coordinator election have opened. A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. The project coordinators are the designated points of contact for issues concerning the project, and are responsible for maintaining our internal structure and processes. They do not, however, have any authority over article content or editor conduct, or any other special powers. More information on being a coordinator is available here. If you are interested in running, please sign up here by 23:59 UTC on 14 September! Voting will commence on 15 September. If you have any questions, you can contact any member of the current coord team. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:41, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open!

Voting for WikiProject Military history coordinators is now open! A team of up to ten coordinators will be elected for the next coordination year. Register your vote here by 23:59 UTC on 29 September! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:35, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military history newcomer of the year and military historian of the year

Nominations now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The the top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Nominations are open here and here respectively. The nomination period closes at 23:59 on 30 November 2024 when voting begins. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:21, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards

Voting is now open for the WikiProject Military History newcomer of the year and military historian of the year awards for 2024! The top editors will be awarded the coveted Gold Wiki. Cast your votes here and here respectively. Voting closes at 23:59 on 30 December 2024. On behalf of the coordinators, wishing you the very best for the festive season and the new year. MediaWiki message delivery via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:00, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]