User talk:VinniusCaesar
Welcome!
[edit]
|
White issues and NOTFORUM
[edit]Hello , you seem to be engaging on the Talk pages of articles like White privilege, White defensiveness, and White genocide conspiracy theory with generalized complaints and your opinions of the articles, such as this one at Talk:White defensiveness:
- This article should be deleted because it's r*tarded.
The Talk page of articles are there as a forum to be used among editors to discuss how to improve the article. They are not for expounding upon a topic, registering one's opinion about it without concrete suggestions for improvement, or engaging in the kind of flamebait that you did in your edit at Talk:White privilege entitled "A sick joke with no scientific basis".
Please confine your comments at Talk pages to discussing how to improve the article. If you believe an article should be deleted, you can nominate it for deletion after learning about the Deletion procedure at WP:AFD. Please be sure you understand the procedure, before starting a nomination. If you have any questions about this or any other Wikipedia editing issue, feel free to ask below, or at the WP:Tea house or WP:Help desk, or on my talk page. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 07:51, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit]
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:White privilege, you may be blocked from editing. — The Hand That Feeds You:Bite 19:44, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
DS Alert
[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Jorm (talk) 06:38, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
August 2021
[edit]
Please refrain from using talk pages for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you.
Flejern (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
November 2021
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 11:36, 30 November 2021 (UTC)December 2021
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.