User talk:Vesper flying chrysanthemum
June 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Ashleyyoursmile. I noticed that you recently removed content from Be Best without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ashleyyoursmile! 05:51, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
Vesper flying chrysanthemum, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Vesper flying chrysanthemum! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC) |
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Godsstone, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.talk, FAQ, contribs
š¶ EpicPupper (he/him | talk, FAQ, contribs | please use {{ping}} on reply) 03:13, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Good Article Reassessment for Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump
[edit]Second impeachment trial of Donald Trump, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 20:33, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Be Best you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 00:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. GeneralNotability (talk) 15:33, 1 July 2021 (UTC)The article Be Best you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Be Best for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Colin M -- Colin M (talk) 23:21, 12 July 2021 (UTC)