User talk:VanlmugH
This is VanlmugH's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
February 2021
[edit]Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg and Broich, from its old location at User:VanlmugH/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. Nathan2055talk - contribs 21:48, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
Welcome
[edit]
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg and Broich (April 6)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg and Broich and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg and Broich, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, VanlmugH!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kichu🐘 Need any help? 16:56, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg and Broich has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Cerebellum (talk) 10:58, 6 June 2021 (UTC)Willem II and Herndrik I counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg Broich
[edit]Dear Moderator I am sorry. I made a typing error in Lemma heading. Herndrik must be Hendrik VanlmugH (talk) 19:43, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi there, is this a translated article from another Wikipedia project? If so, you have to attribute the original you're translating from. You can do so with this template for the talk page: Template:Translated page. By the way, do you know about WP:BABEL? You can use these userboxes for signalling, to other editors, what languages you are capable in. -- asilvering (talk) 01:43, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Cut-and-paste move
[edit]Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Willem II and Herndrik I counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg Broich a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Willem II and Hendrik I counts of Limburg Hohenlimburg Broich. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.
In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. 🐶 EpicPupper (he/him | talk) 03:53, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of Johan of Limburg Hohenlimburg Broich, probst of Werden for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johan of Limburg Hohenlimburg Broich, probst of Werden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Fram (talk) 16:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
- Dear Fram
- Indeed: The bibliography is limited but can still be supplemented. More references to authentic sources (certificates, deeds) can also be added. Unfortunately, I made a mistake in reference (inline citation) [2]. The book EAN 9789490258184 (2018) is (possibly due to rectification) no longer available in bookshops. It is certain that the persons in question were neither day laborers nor bastards. The word "swindlers" did not belong to their vocabulary and therefore does not appear in their surviving sources.
- My proposal is:
- Supplementing the Literature
- More source references to include
- To delete (inline citation) reference [2] entirely. VanlmugH (talk) 23:09, 15 March 2022 (UTC)
- Certificates, deeds, ... are primary sources which do nothing to establish notability of the subject (and should be used very sparingly in general, please see WP:OR). Articles should be based on reliable, independent, secondary sources, things like book (chapters) about the person written by recognised experts, published by established publishers (not someone publishing his own research through a publish-on-demand channel or so). If you can't provide these, the article is very likely to be redirected or deleted. Fram (talk) 08:38, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Dietrich III, Bishop of Münster
[edit]Question: Can the literature section in this article be translated to English? --Whiteguru (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)
Ways to improve Dietrich III, Bishop of Münster
[edit]Hello, VanlmugH,
Thank you for creating Dietrich III, Bishop of Münster.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Literature section needs translation
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}
. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Whiteguru (talk) 08:58, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
Categories you are adding: House of Limburg, Counts of Limburg, House of Limburg Styrum
[edit]Hello. I am concerned about how the above-mentioned categories are being used. There seem to be different families being confused, and different places named Limburg. If I understand correctly you are also aiming for each such profile to be in the same sets of overlapping categories, so you are not thinking about the hierarchical structures of those. These categories are also being added to people who don't seem to have any real connection to any of them, such as [[Erenfried II]] (which I have taken out of these categories). Have you got any experience with categories on Wikipedia? Perhaps you should ask around for some advice on this. Otherwise the situation could get quite confusing. Andrew Lancaster (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)