User talk:Vanished user 7782930114

Your GA nomination of Tellico Dam

The article Tellico Dam you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Tellico Dam for comments about the article, and Talk:Tellico Dam/GA3 for the nomination. Well done! If the article has never appeared on the Main Page as a "Did you know" item, and has not appeared within the last year either as "Today's featured article", or as a bold link under "In the news" or in the "On this day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear at DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On this day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Jonathanischoice -- Jonathanischoice (talk) 03:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Dookie

The sources in the text give a different date for Green Day's last Gilman Street performance. How do you suppose we go about resolving this? dannymusiceditor ^oops 20:06, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There are some audio tid bits on YouTube of the September 3, 1993 show billing it as the "last performance" at Gilman here: [1] Setlist.fm also gives information on a show in Florida on the September 24th date here:[2]

Here is a given list of bands that played at 924 Gilman, Green Day played the Sept. 3 show under the name "Blair Hess" here: [3] This same source does not provide a source for a Green Day show on Sept. 24th. AppalachianCentrist (talk) 23:55, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

None of the sources here are particularly reliable except perhaps #3, but I could accept this evidence in a rare case like this one. The reliable sources appear to be at odds with each other. dannymusiceditor ^oops 13:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 16

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Strait, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Western music.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Punk Bunny Coffee

The article Punk Bunny Coffee has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article reads like an advertisement, and I can barely find any sources following the name change.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Orphaned non-free image File:Oak Ridge National Laboratory official logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Oak Ridge National Laboratory official logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:15, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]