User talk:Usacin

Concern regarding Draft:Rchid Bidak

Hello, Usacin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rchid Bidak, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Rchid Bidak

Hello, Usacin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Rchid Bidak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the problem is ive created the article then someone deleted , i dont know why , Rchid Bidak its a Moroccan Writer, Sorry , im not interested anymore to be part of wikipedia. 84.10.31.182 (talk) 07:06, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Rchid Bidak

Hello Usacin, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Rchid Bidak, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rchid Bidak.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Chaotic Enby}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 20:57, 28 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Chaotic Enby,

Thank you for notifying me about the discussion regarding the potential deletion of the article on Rchid Bidak.

I understand the importance of meeting Wikipedia's notability guidelines and ensuring articles are well-sourced. I have published an article on Rchid Bidak because he has made significant contributions as a novelist and has a book published. In the article, I included links to reliable sources that confirm his existence and credibility, distinguishing him from any random or fake individuals.

I will actively participate in the deletion discussion and will work on further improving the article based on the feedback provided. Thank you for your guidance and for the opportunity to discuss this matter.

Best regards,

Usacin ~~~~ Bidak (talk) 12:25, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Good job Historjan (talk) 08:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]