User talk:Urartu99

Welcome!

Hello, Urartu99, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Fayenatic (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

Thank you for your edits to Chartered Accountant. However, these have been undone as people with the designation 'chartered [something] accountants' are not allowed to call themselves 'chartered accountants'. - Fayenatic (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Chartered Accountant

Hi Fayenatic.

I do not pass word of a mouth or gossips to wikipedia, I added ACCA and other appropriate institutions to "Chartered Accountant" section based on the reports by UK Professional Oversight Board. Report clearly indicates that there are more than 3 Chartered Accounting Bodies in UK (please see here: http://www.frc.org.uk/pob/publications/pub2013.html ). If someone is a member of a Chartered Accontancy Body - that person is a chartered account. Please re-edit your post and correct additions I had made. Thank you.

Hi Urartu99,

You are free to invent your own definitions, but please do not add them to Wikipedia. Not all UK chartered bodies are entitled to designate their members as Chartered Accountants; that title is restricted in the UK to members of the ICAEW, ICAS and ICAI. ACCA's members are Chartered Certified Accountants, CIPFA's are Chartered Public Accountants and CIMA's are Chartered Management Accountants; none of these three are permitted to use the title Chartered Accountant, although I understand that if ACCA members want to use a shorter title they may continue to use their former designation Certified Accountant. - Fayenatic (talk) 15:41, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Fayenatic,

Can you please indicate the rule or legislation that restricts, say, ACCA members to call them Chartered Accountants? If you work in that field you should be aware that many years ago Certified Accountants and Chartered Accountants had different privileges and responsibilities - that isn't the case anymore. Main governing body for the profession, Professional Oversight Boards, calls 6 bodies as Chartered Accountancy Bodies. We can play with the words but the substance will stay same. Again, there were restrictions for bodies, such as CIMA and ACCA before, but they are gone. I wasn't able to find any "restrictions" you are mentioning.

I base my comments on the official report from POB 2009. What is the basis of your comments? If no real bassis then please correct, otherwise I will.

Thank you.

The POB was correct, but perhaps misleading in its choice of words. There are six chartered bodies which train accountants in the UK, but not all of them call their members Chartered Accountants. The entitlement to use certain designations is given in the charters of each professional body. The relevant part of ACCA's charter is already quoted at Talk:Chartered Accountant.

As you are a new editor here you may not have noticed that every article has a linked discussion page. Some "frequently asked questions" may already have been discussed on such pages, in an attempt to reach consensus on improving the article. If you are unsure of something, I encourage you to check the talk page before editing, or to ask a question there.

I hope you will continue to contribute to Wikipedia, and find it enjoyable and constructive! - Fayenatic (talk) 09:27, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. In case you have any more questions, please I note that I may not be able to reply for the next two weeks. - Fayenatic (talk) 09:35, 29 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Here (2011 film)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Here (2011 film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Theo polisme 21:10, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]