User talk:UnrepentantTaco

Welcome!

Hello, UnrepentantTaco, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Safiel (talk) 21:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Alan Keyes Is Making Sense

Just a note that I have declined your request for speedy deletion at Alan Keyes Is Making Sense. Television series/episodes are not eligible for Speedy Deletion under the A7 (lack of asserted notability) guideline. However, if you wish, you may still propose the article for deletion under WP:PROD or nominate the article for deletion pursuant to WP:AFD. Safiel (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

UnrepentantTaco, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi UnrepentantTaco! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Ryan Vesey (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Johann Christian Gottlieb Ernesti

Hello UnrepentantTaco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Johann Christian Gottlieb Ernesti, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Being a Prof is enough for A7, plus he seems to be at least referenced in Britannica. Thank you. Ged UK 11:49, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kris Povlsen

Hello UnrepentantTaco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kris Povlsen, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Clearly an elected Mayor is notable enough for A7, and frankly I'd be amazed if he didn't get throguh AfD too. Thank you. Ged UK 12:14, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Roger Jenisch

Hello UnrepentantTaco. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Roger Jenisch, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: per WP:POLITICIAN, a member of a state House of Representatives is notable. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 13:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

advice

And i have declined some similar ones. Even being a mayor of a small city is possibly notable. And the standard for a7 is much less than notability , just of mere indication of plausible importance -- see WP:CSD for an explanation. DGG ( talk ) 14:41, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

...and there is good advice for speedy taggers at WP:10CSD and WP:A7M. JohnCD (talk) 14:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, UnrepentantTaco. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by öBrambleberry of RiverClan 22:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Merge recommendations in AfD nom

Hey—I saw that your Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Electoral history of Alan Keyes nom recommended merge as the course of action and wanted to give you a heads up that if the AfD nom doesn't have a deletion argument, it qualifies for speedy keep #1 (for not having a deletion argument). (The aforementioned AfD nom doesn't qualify since someone else has recommended deletion.) In the future, you can propose what may be a controversial move at Wikipedia:Proposed mergers or otherwise just do it yourself WP:BOLDly. Have a good one czar · · 18:47, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fons Hickmann

Why did you insta-withdraw this nomination? Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:57, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Electoral history of Alan Keyes

How did you come to the conclusion that this meant this? Your edit comment was "Restoring redirect per consensus in afd discussion." Not sure where you read that a consensus of "keep" means "redirect." --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:26, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

June 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jclemens (talk) 06:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AfD voting pattern

Hi Unrepentant,

I've noticed that you are nominating articles for deletion and then writing Delete in your nomination text. As nominator, you can't vote and so you should cease this practice in nominations and please delete your most recent edits where you've done this. You can start with Helen Krauze, which I've voted on. If you need help finding the others, you can use the snottywong tool]. You can use the tool also to keep track of your percentage of your votes that match the final results of the AfD. Your matches seem low to me. Using the same tool, you can look at mine -- I'm often voting keep -- or User:DGG -- who also nominates many articles for deletion like you do -- to compare. You may have already known about this tool! Good luck, Crtew (talk) 15:09, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed you've been tagged as a sock puppet. Crtew (talk) 15:10, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]