User talk:UnknownAristo

Pouget

Instead of edit-warring about content that should not be in an article, you should spend your time adding some reliable sources to show this person's notability. I've read your comments posted so far and they do not indicate any reason for keeping the article. I'm minded to delete it now for lack of notability - if after reconsideration you think an article is still warranted, you should use the article wizard to recreate it. —SMALL JIM 21:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Update. I have deleted the page - you are welcome to re-create it using the article wizard if you can show that Xavier Pouget meets our notability criteria. —SMALL JIM 21:31, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Smalljim:You certainly have. Thank you for letting me know. I can clearly see the execution of the steps you have taken in this matter. A free encyclopedia is one which sounds almost as if one may freely publish a page on anyone or anything, as long as true of course, without being charged or exposed to any kind of limiting factor that will constrict the freedom of movement of information. The page I created is about an individual who has researched into very niche fields of Mathematics including Primordial Background Radiation, Differential Geometry within Euclidean space and Gravitational Fields within Black Holes. Even if you have not seen this and were completely unaware of my true intentions and could only see a page of what seemed like a young man and a few details, how dare you dictate what is and what is not "notable" and "significant" information. good day.