Jump to content

User talk:United Union/Archive 3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4

Battle of Batina

What can I say - thank you for writing the article on a really interesting yet little known WWII battle! GregorB (talk) 20:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kolinda Grabar-Kitarović
added a link pointing to Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs
Matica hrvatska
added a link pointing to Petar Šegedin
Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Zadar
added a link pointing to Nin
Separation of church and state
added a link pointing to Epiphany

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

A page you started (Nansi Tireli) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Nansi Tireli, United Union!

Wikipedia editor Kudpung just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Please expand this article

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grand Lodge of Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons of Croatia, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Glina and Križevci. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:45, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grand Lodge of Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons of Croatia logo.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grand Lodge of Ancient, Free and Accepted Masons of Croatia logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Republic of Croatia Armed Forces may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • |2013|| 4.85 <ref>blnref name="defender.hr">{{cite web|url=http://www.defender.hr/republika-hrvatska/obrambena-politika/morh-u-manje-novca-kroz-
  • long term program, purchase of up to 18 4.5 generation fighters, program cost - 12-15 billion kuna (program is a long term investment in to air force next fighter with new fighters joining the Air

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:22, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 15 September

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Croatia–Malaysia relations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page War in Yugoslavia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Help with EU financial regulation articles?

Hi United Union! I'm searching for editors who'd be willing to help me make improvements to the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive article and European Market Infrastructure Regulation articles, and I thought you might be interested. I found you on the list of recently active participants over at WP:INTR and hoped you might want to take a look at my proposed updates. They're available here for MiFID and here for EMIR. As a disclosure: I do have a conflict of interest as I'm working on this topic as a paid consultant to the Managed Funds Association and I won't make any edits to the live article. Let me know your thoughts and if you'd be able to look at either of the articles. Thanks! 16912 Rhiannon (Talk · COI) 12:14, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Oppinion polls

Do you know why there is no more this picture that I have uploaded? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:GraphCroatia2016summ.gif --Tuvixer (talk) 10:46, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

I really don't know why. Maybe it's some kind of glitch considering that it can be seen normally in the article but not on Commons.United Union (talk) 17:35, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vladimir Barović, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montenegrin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Roman Catholicism in Croatia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dominicans. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:00, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vlado Košić, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Hrastovica and Dubovac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Luka Modrić

Hi! Why did you remove Luka Modrić from the text? Hrvat specialist (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Because its unnecessary to remove Blanka Vlašić's image. Why would you do that? We have one male and one female athlete. United Union (talk) 21:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Božo Petrov

Zdravo, do you have sources to claim he was member of Hrast before 2012? I've hidden the info from the template for the time being. Hvala,--Davide Denti (OBC) (talk) 22:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Biden&Milanovic.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Biden&Milanovic.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Žarko Domljan.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Žarko Domljan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nedjeljko Mihanović.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nedjeljko Mihanović.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nansi Tireli.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nansi Tireli.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:52, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ivan Krajačić.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ivan Krajačić.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:46, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Zlatan Sremec.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zlatan Sremec.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:21, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Križevci Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Križevci. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Zadar Cathedral

Hi. Thanks for restoring the content of façade description, which I think I removed since it was barely understandable. I corrected some recurrent errors ("statutes" instead of "statues" etc), but did not understand what di you mean with "harsh relief": basrelief? Thanks and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 10:58, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I also copyedited Križevci Cathedral which had the same problems. Thank and good work. --'''Attilios''' (talk) 11:07, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Re: SDP, HNS, HDZ articles...

Well, that goes without saying. Every vote for a candidate is a vote for a list, but not every vote for a list is a vote for a candidate. Maybe the solution is to link to a common article that has a full explanation of the system? Croatian parliamentary election, 2015#Electoral law amendments perhaps?

I didn't mention that part explicitly in every table preface because the linked article cited statements discarding a statistical relevance to it. It said that the coverage of preferential votes was 72% and 68% resp. for the two coalitions, and postulated that voters of all parties used preferential votes in the same manner. Thereafter they also calculated percentage ratings, but I've avoided citing that, I just used that interesting cross-tab of well-known data.

The coalition total goes directly into the D'Hondt method and determines the winners, so it's clearly the most important. But this new number, while only partially relevant to the election, seems very relevant to party articles, because it allows insight into their support despite them having been part of a coalition. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 09:40, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:United_Union/Archive_3&oldid=803700685"