User talk:Ultraexactzz/Archive 3

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

→

Archive 10

This archive includes edits to User talk:Ultraexactzz from March 2008 through May 2008.

Sir I have edited this users content, but the user kept reverting

I agree completely with your accusations, but you need to understand that this is why I have been requesting the blocks against the user Thegingerone in the first place.Kevin j (talk) 19:45, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

In Response

No, I do not write like that kind of of person. The user harasses me, I respond. And no, the dispute will not be resolved for another day, because it needs to be resolved NOW. Read the content the user wrote earlier, because yes there is vandalism. Also, I only wrote the questions three times because it didn't seem like me voice was getting heard.Kevin j (talk) 20:42, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank for your concern. To answer you questions, all I want is the administrators to enforce the content in the articles like they should be enforced. One crucial policy to me is the NPOV policy. I want the resolution to be resolved through this enforcement, and I want it to be made clear to Thegingerone that it will be enforced and that it must be followed, and that the user, like all other users, will be blocked if the vandalism continues. BestKevin j (talk) 20:55, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

RfA

Hi there Ultraexactzz. Just a note of thanks for your support in my recent unsuccessful RfA. I do appreciate your vote and advice. I'll be back in a few months with more experience and more coaching, so I hope to have your support again then. Thanks again - Tanthalas39 (talk) 18:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Sharesource

Good job on cleaning the sharesource article.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I originally tagged it for advertising language before I applied the speedy tag. After a about fifteen minutes of good searching I couldn't find anything reliable so I speedy tagged it. I think the editor is going to be between a rock and hard place for sources and it might never make it past an AfD, but I'll keep my eye out for anything that might be of value.--Torchwood Who? (talk) 15:38, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Deletion Review for Magillem

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Magillem. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 19:34, 24 March 2008 (UTC)

Re: Quick question on policy

Lists like that aren't allowed - the relevant policy is WP:UCS. :D Just remove it and block away if they try to play Johnny Dangerous. east.718 at 02:26, March 26, 2008

Apollo 8

By all means put the text in as a seperate section, but for consistency with all other spaceflight articles the bulleted list should be kept in place at the start. Hammersfan, 26/03/08, 23.29 GMT

Not really, because, as I have stated, for concistency every manned spaceflight article would need to be so altered. Besides, having looked at the text in detail, much of what is relevant I have put in the bullet list or added as notes. I have listed below bullet points about my views on the text:

• Date crew announced: Irrelevant - why should the date this crew was announced matter any more than the date any other crew was announced?
• Crew: Bulleted alongside roles - what their previous flights were is irrelevant in the context of this flight; all that is needed is the number of flights they have made as with all other missions.
• Swapping of Collins and Lovell: Mention made in the brief note I have left, along with the reason and the reference.
• Reason for Backup crew: Irrelevant, because that comes under the heading of "the blooming obvious" - for such a task, there are always backups.
• Haise being drafted in: Mention made in the brief note I have left.
  

Putting in a standard crew bullet list with notes, as is the case on other manned spaceflight articles, does not detract from its status as a featured article, but to me the whole point is that related pages should follow certain standards of concistency - manned spaceflight missions have similar layouts, and this mission, important as it was and well written as it may be, should follow these also. Hammersfan 27/03/08, 00.12 GMT

User:Pope Barry George

On top of the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muscle derived stem cells that you commented, he also posted this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Jordan (singer) and please notice my comment about that "Jimbo" comment. Something need to be done.SYSS Mouse (talk) 15:58, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! You can thank others by using {{subst:Vangel}}! Nburden ^(T) 16:49, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

How Do You Submit An Entry In Checkuser

I haven't so long I forget how to add Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Mr Bullockx to the main checkuser page. -WarthogDemon 20:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. This is just ridiculous and I hope I can remain civil about it all. Happy editing! -WarthogDemon 20:52, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

You said it! But, I will not vent my frustration here. I will vent it by playing a computer game. There's nothing like causing death and destruction to entire civilizations, just because you feel like it. :) -WarthogDemon 21:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

User:Suciindia

Hi, User:Suciindia posted some comments in talk page. The vandalism done by the IP 213.160.242.61 certainly does not belong to User:Suciindia. User:Suciindia is from India and the IP used by this account certainly will be of India. IP 213.160.242.61 is from Oslo [1]. This IP certainly does not belong to User:Suciindia. User:Suciindia is controlled by an Indian party. So can you review the block. Thanks. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 10:30, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Got the warning

The inclusion of the links along with my signature has discontinued... Can you please tell me what on earth the point thatHu12 is attempting to make? DrunkenDialer (talk) 08:58, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

ECOLAS

Dear UltraExactZZ, I stand for ECOLAS which has an article in Wikipedia that was challenged by you. You are asking to provide references. However, I don't know which certain information shold be marked with source. We are only starting organization and there are not many paper or electronic sources yet. Anyway, I would like to add anything if possible. But I myself don't see the information in the article as of nature where external references would be appropriate yet. Show me in which I am wrong. Thank you in advance for informing me so that I can enhance article's quality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrej blacky (talk • contribs) 11:28, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I've made corrections according to your comment. Is that enough to take tags references and wikify away? Isn't it rude to do it myself? --Andrej blacky (talk) 12:58, 16 April 2008 (UTC)

Acknowledgement

Sorry about the messages. I didn't mean to violate policy, I've interacted with the above admins and wanted them to have first notice. No canvassing meant. ESCStudent774441 (talk) 03:54, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Keep it cool, okay?ESCStudent774441 (talk) 03:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For [2]. Missed that one. Darkspots (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2008 (UTC)

"I need opinion on Mediation Cases and Point of view pushing"[3]

To your specific question, the creator of the above noticeboard post is most likely a sock of User:Mykungfu, and has been reported at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mykungfu (6th); he's just taking advantage of the backlog and his new proxy to be disruptive, which as been his MO for some time. Whenever he/she is found, the puppet uses administrative complaints as retaliation, usually targeting the same editors as before his previous socks. See [4],[5], and [6].-RoBoTam^ice 21:18, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

thank spam

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which passed with 194 supporting, 9 opposing, and 4 neutral. Your kindness and constructive criticism is very much appreciated. I look forward to using the tools you have granted me to aid the project. I would like to give special thanks to Tim Vickers, Anthony and Acalamari for their nominations. Thank you again, VanTucky

WP:AN/I

Hey, I guess something went wrong and some current threads are lost [7]. Can you restore them please? Thanks Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 14:51, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Rather curious as to why the editor (Jsn...) chose to censor all of my contributions from yesterday. I'm suspecting a bit of trollery. Orderinchaos 15:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I didn't revert you as such - I was restoring a nearly 2-hour-old version which was still intact. For some reason the editor went in and surgically removed random comments - several of which were mine from earlier in the day. Apologies if my actions caused any confusion or offence at your end - was certainly unintended. Orderinchaos 15:10, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

No worries, I think what happens when something bizarre like that happens is that different people with different bits of the story try to figure out what went on and end up at seeming cross purposes with each other until they all figure out what happened :) Gotta love community editing. Thanks for sorting it out. Orderinchaos 15:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, my messages seem to have sorted right. Wiki San Roze ^†αLҝ 15:41, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

archiving accident

Please see my response on my talk page to your inquiry... and if you could help me find an explanation for what is happening with my ban and my comments being deleted out of AN/I threads before archiving I would greatly appreciate it. Jsn9333 (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Miria (singer) and Gayle Day - refimprove

Hi - thanks for changing the status on my Gayle Day article from db-person to refimprove - if you get a chance can you look at my Miria (singer) article and see if you would agree that it makes sense to change that status as well?

Thanks very much! Achyls (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you! I will endeavor to be a good WP citizen and find better sources. Achyls (talk) 18:27, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

LOYOLAMD1

Referring to Loyola College in Maryland and Loyola College Name Change, I am new to this, please specifically let me know what parts of my post seemed to carry a non neutral point of view as all of my comments were facts. Former Loyola College President Harold Ridley opposed a name change, that is a historical fact. The opposing view to the current name change are potential branding issues, that is a fact that this in an opposing view. Those with comments have been invited to contact the school directly by the methods I have mentioned.

I would be happy to change the references to academic programs at Loyola Universities if that was problematic. Please provide specifics as I am keen to have this page updates, this is relevant, newsworthy and timely information and that the public should know about in the event that they are seeking further information regarding Loyola College. Thank you. LOYOLAMD1 (talk) 15:06, 24 April 2008 (UTC)LOYOLAMD1 —Preceding unsigned comment added by LOYOLAMD1 (talk • contribs) 14:55, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Fadiga and the Ip

It´s true that I have a discussion with Fadiga in a few articles but: Isn´t it a HUGE cheat to edit with an IP number and with a count created? Isn´t a HUGE cheat to do what he wants with an IP, CHEATING the warning he recives? Please, one thing is one thing, and another thing is another thing... Don´t mix the issues, please. We are talking about tow different things... I can´t discuss with users that cheats, breaking the wikipedia rules...

See you, --Ultracanalla (talk) 14:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Re: Signpost

Thanks for the correction. It's a blind spot for the {{ffr}} OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 18:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Probably this article is the first time to go through FAR twice. I wonder what I should do if it becomes FA again and then delisted once again. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 19:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to the Military history project

Hi, and welcome to the Military history WikiProject! As you may have guessed, we're a group of editors working to improve Wikipedia's coverage of topics related to military history.

A few features that you might find helpful:

• Our navigation box points to most of the useful pages within the project.
• The announcement and open task box is updated very frequently. You can watchlist it if you're interested; or, you can add it directly to your user page by including {{WPMILHIST Announcements}} there.
• Most important discussions take place on the project's main discussion page; it is highly recommended that you watchlist it.
• The project has several departments, which handle article quality assessment, detailed article and content review, writing contests, article logistics, and other tasks.
• We have a number of task forces that focus on specific topics, nations, periods, and conflicts.
• We've developed a style guide that covers article structure and content, template use, categorization, and many other issues of interest.
• If you're looking for something to work on, there are many articles that need attention.
• The project has a stress hotline available for your use.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to ask one of the project coordinators, or any experienced member of the project, and we'll be happy to help you. Again, welcome! We look forward to seeing you around! Woody (talk) 18:30, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

WP:AIV

Hi. You reported an IP to AIV, and I have declined the report. While some of the IPs edits do not seem to be productive, and the IP is not discussing disputed edits in the proper way, there does not seem to be overt vandalism for which a block would be in order. I've cautioned the IP to discuss such disputed changes before making them, and I'll monitor as I can. If there are further shenanigans, please report them to the Administrator's Noticeboard for Incidents at WP:ANI, as this goes beyond the simple vandalism that AIV handles. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:37, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Sorry we weren't able to help out this time around, and sorry you had to report multiple times. I've watchlisted some of the problem articles, and I'll keep an eye on the IP's contributions; If they revert without discussing, or if they revert a good faith edit as vandalism, ping me and I'll block if I'm around. For your reference, the report and discussion were moved to the talk page at WT:AIV. Thanks, UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 13:59, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much. ● 8~Hype ^@ 14:58, 29 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Peteforsyth

Ooops, I forgot to change the vote. I did it now. Basically, I had the same concern, but realized it was not such a big thing. Bearian (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXVI (April 2008)

The April 2008 issue of the Military history WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:38, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:43, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

User:10dellis

hi there, this user 10dellis is reverting my edits and keeps writing spam and vandalism on your userpage Christopher140691 (talk) 14:42, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

No idea why this user is so wanting to vandalise an Admins page. Bit foolish if you ask me Christopher140691 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem. Didn't know if you had seen it thats why I thought I would tell you. Thats a good response to a problem user. Bloced indef. Christopher140691 (talk) 15:26, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Treelo

I don't want to overstep, but in just the last 30-40 minutes, many of his/her reverts have been called into question. Is removal of rollback applicable at this point? At least until Treelo decides its time to discuss, maybe this will get his/her attention. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:34, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

It appears Treelo has commented at the exact same time as I posted the above. Disregard at will :) SynergeticMaggot (talk) 13:37, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Olaf750

Just thought you might be interested in this. Don't know why the IP thought your name was a good one to use. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 13:26, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

No problem. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 20:47, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy means speedy

Thank you for your quick action. I found the page kind of horrifying. David in DC (talk) 20:57, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

F class

up to you, but I see from his talk page he's been given final warnings about this before. DGG (talk) 20:46, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

The COOKIE MONSTER ate the cow

Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Hi just to make sure you’re not too hungry, I would’ve given you milk – but the cow just died and I tried to milk the bull but it kicked me in the face. *sob*. Anyway, enjoy the cookie!! Fattyjwoods ^{(Push my button)} 01:42, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Page deleted

Hi, I wanted to let you know that there is a page that has been used to attack me here User:Omero Tognon. The person who made it has been asked to discontinue the accusations by administrators. My user page also had to be protected. I appreciate the deletion of Category:Wikipedia sockpuppets of Libro0. I was hoping that this page Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Libro0 could also be deleted on grounds it is an attack in which the user was told to cease. Libro0 (talk) 21:31, 11 May 2008 (UTC) Thank you. Libro0 (talk) 18:15, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Hi, sorry to bother you. It appears as though the attacker has struck again. The User:Box Benefits page has once again been tagged with my name. Would it be possible for this page and the one above to be removed? Libro0 (talk) 08:02, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Ꙏ

How was this patent nonsense? While admittedly I can't read cyrillic and don't have a font installed that displays this glyph, it looked like a perfectly comprehensible (if short) article, seemed consistent with both Ь and Ъ (which it linked to) and Cyrillic characters in Unicode (which links to it), and googles quite well, considering the obscure subject. —Cryptic 15:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Rfb participation thanks

Hello, Ultra.

I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no "Ultra-Exact" consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your both your early and strong support, and your continued advice. -- Avi (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

deletion of template talk page

Hi, Ultraexactzz. I may have goofed the request for speedy deletion of Template talk:South Dakota college football venues. Actually, that one was supposed to stay and Template talk:South Dakota College Football Venues was supposed to be deleted. Could you take a look at that? --Gwguffey (talk) 18:43, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Perfect. Thanks for fixing that. --Gwguffey (talk) 18:49, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Campus Outreach Opportunity League

You recently deleted an article that I was still in the middle of writing. Your comment stated that it looked like an advertisement. I was writing a historical record of a key national non-profit organization that existed for about 20 years. Since it no longer exists, it is definitely not an ad. I did not yet have a chance to add in references.

Here they are in case you want to check them first: http://www.learningtogive.org/papers/index.asp?bpid=181 http://www.bonner.org/about/WMeisel.htm http://www.wkkf.org/Default.aspx?tabid=97&CID=288&CatID=288&ItemID=2236&NID=96&LanguageID=0 http://servenet.org/Toolkit/Pages/OrganizationProfile/tabid/230/mygroupid/8/Default.aspx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jsarvey (talk • contribs) 20:05, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

deletion of template talk page - part 2

The same thing happened with the request for speedy deletion of Template talk:South Carolina college football venues. The one was supposed to be deleted was Template talk:South Carolina College Football Venues. Could you fix that one, too? --Gwguffey (talk) 03:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, Ultra. Sorry for making more work for you. I am done moving that set, but should I need to do something similar in the future, what would be the best way to help avoid that situation? Should I blank the talk page at the same time as requesting the G7 speedy on the article/template? --Gwguffey (talk) 03:31, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Great. Thank you for the follow up. Best wishes. --Gwguffey (talk) 04:16, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi Ultraexactzz; I wanted to say thank you for supporting my request for adminship, which passed with 100 supports, 0 opposes and 1 neutral. I wanted to get round everybody individually, even though it's considered by some to be spam (which... I suppose it is! but anyway. :)). It means a lot to me that the community has placed its trust in my ability to use the extra buttons, and I only hope I can live up to its expectations. If you need anything, or notice something that bothers you, don't hesitate to let me know. Thanks again, PeterSymonds | talk 21:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Dr Spam (MD)

I suggest that you ask that user to verify that they are a doctor or ban them. Is there somewhere that I can complain about inappropriate usernames? Dr Spam is bad enough but the Dr Spam (MD) makes a claim of being a doctor. Worse yet, they have been disciplined for bad behavior. This brings disrepute to the medical profession.

On the other hand, I am seeking to have verification that I am a doctor so that people will know that I am not a convict or from a drug company. After I get that, then I plan to write something in Wikipedia. Doctor Wikipedian (talk) 16:45, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Lots of doctors have been disciplined for bad behaviour. The GMC employs full time staff for no other purpose. Sorry what's your point? Dr Spam (MD) (talk) 10:03, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

WP:HAU

Hello again. The Highly Active Users project has gone through a complete revamping per popular demand. We believe this new format will make it easier for new editors to find assistance. However, with the new format, I must again ask you to verify your information on this page. I attempted to translate the data from the old version to the new, but with the extensive changes, I may have made some errors. Thanks again. Useight (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

RFA Thanks

Thanks for your support at my recent Request for adminship. I hope you find I live up to your expectations. Best, Risker (talk) 15:44, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Lara's MFD

See my response to Equaczion. Sarcasticidealist (talk) 18:40, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

ANI

WP:ANI#User:LaraLove's controversial userbox. Equazcion •✗/C • 22:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Your comment here was greatly appreciated. dihydrogen monoxide (H2O) 00:13, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks!

		RfA: Many thanks
		Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 06:09, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

geminate

couldn't you wait even 1 week before deleting "geminate recombination" ?
google "geminate recombination" to see how many scientific papers use this theory, yet wikipedia has no direct page on this kinetic theory.
i honestly think that you should have waited atleast a week before deleting, didn't you read what i wrote?
omermar @ 18/05/08. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Omermar (talk • contribs) 13:17, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

n-prize

Many thanks for your helpful comments and editing. Just one thing - I believe the neutrality of the article came into question because another administrator believed that I was the organiser (I actaully found out about it from "New Scientist"). Would it be OK to remove this tag now especially as you've been through the text?--Garf444 (talk) 15:39, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

You a serius adnim? This is seriuz bisnes

[8]. Does this qualify as a "shenanigan"? (I'll leave the joy of figuring the code out to yourself... =|:-) Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:41, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Hashmi, Usman

I have been monitoring him for a couple of days and reverting several of his unhelpful edits and issued him several warnings. How is requesting CSD for meaningless pages unhelpful? I decided to CSD them when I saw that the pages they lead to are up for CSD. If they are deleted, the redirect pages would be orphans. I deleted the warnings per the ANI discussion re leaving his page blanked. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:17, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Fair enough. My bad! I just figured that if the redirect remained the admin would be sent to the redirect page and would have to come back. But I guess that is easier than looking at the history. I have restored the warnings and will let [User:Hashmi, Usman]] delete them if he wants. Harry the Dog WOOF 20:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)

Dursun Karataş

Please undelete Dursun Karataş, he's a notable political figure. WP:BLP issues are not dealt with deletion, but with copyediting. --Soman (talk) 13:14, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I had the article on my watchlist, but had not noticed the prod. --Soman (talk) 15:32, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for deleting my page! (note to others reading this, I'm not being sarcastic)! Cheers! WikiZorro^sign 18:41, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

:O

Thanks for sorting that out. Have some flowers. Gurchzilla (talk) 19:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Copyright violation

The editor who posted is not the copyright holder and the copyright holder has objected to the posted just below in the section marked comment. 70.243.80.195 (talk) 20:55, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Sorry. I replaced it with just some text earlier, but other editors less mindful of copyright keep restoring the vio. 70.243.80.195 (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm sure Ultraexactzz has already figured out what's going on, namely that the author of the e-mail got caught canvassing and isn't happy about it. The "copyright violation" argument is bogus. Wikipedia can cite as much of the e-mail as it wants to, to demonstrate the rule violation. Baseball Bugs ^{What's up, Doc?} 21:49, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

Jack McClellan

Cool. :) Just a comment as I'm happy to wait for the AFD on this one. CSD G10 as written doesn't appear to apply only in instances where the attack is unreferenced. The sentence where referencing is raised reads as if this is simply one example of where the policy applies. That is, "This includes [but is not necessarily limited to?] a biography of a living person that is entirely negative in tone and unsourced". The main criteria, however, appears to be simply that the article "serves no purpose but to disparage their subject or some other entity". (Whether or not the only purpose of this particular page is to disparage the subject is in my view the main arguable point here.) Debate (talk) 04:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

living with michael

hello thank you for your message at that discusion on deletion I did learn from my new friend doctor strange that it was not an apropriate nominee however julube simply wanted to jump on me and acuse me of being part of kristy or a troublemaker I am not a troublemaker and althoughh I do have dedication to the cause of michael it is not malicios SDLexington (talk) 11:18, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Hashmi, Usman revisted?

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dutch_Danes. Some users are repeating the concerns that came up at ANI the other day (specifically about unnecessary ethnicity/nationality pages). Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2008 (UTC)

House music songs

Thank you for responding. "Good Faith" is fine; I have left explanations at most of my reverts, left messages on discussion boards related to the topic and even began a dialogue with this person. If you read my talk board, he/she doesn't seem all that friendly. Also -- I thought that Wiki dealt in FACT and this addition to the list just isn't factual! In any event, I am seeing that this whole fiasco is proving to be POINTLESS and that there isn't any hope for Wiki editors. I know a celeb who wanted to edit a non-factual tidbit about herself and was quickly blocked (?). That doesn't bode well for Wiki; I just want to contribute like anyone else, but this sort of thing seems to get out of hand all the time. I should perhaps learn how to become an administrator... (Mirror Ball 16:27, 27 May 2008 (UTC))

Presumption of Guilt

"I'm discussing the matter with Mwmalone (talk · contribs) on his talk page, but I'd also ask that you try to assume good faith with regard to Mwmalone; even if his edits appear to be vandalism, some benefit of the doubt may be in order. I've also asked Mwmalone to do the same (assume good faith) with regard to your edits. I'm hoping this can be discussed without further edit warring, and I'd invite you to raise your points at talk:Hot Summer (song).

This sound like you(and Wikipedia) have already decided in Noboyo's favor and presumed my guilt in the matter. This in not fair.

"I've requested that both Mwmalone (talk · contribs) and Noboyo (talk · contribs) discuss the genre of this song here. I note that a source was provided indicating that the song was House, which Mwmalone disputes. I would strongly ask that the matter be discussed and evaluated here, and that no further reversions take place, as the article is (and was) dangerously close to an edit war. Thanks in advance,"

Noboyo hasn't really provided any good sources, other than the fact that an artist from the group in question -- Monrose -- labeled it as "house music". That is akin to Dolly Parton labeling "Jolene" as disco; just because the performed says it doesn't make it a fact. Also, Noboyo has discussed NOTHING! He/she just made the changes and went on. I've heard the Wiki administration could be this presumptive, but this is my first time experiencing this. This issue doesn't look to have an easy resolution -- especially if you've already decided in Noboyo's favor! (Mirror Ball 18:30, 27 May 2008 (UTC))

RfA thank you spam

Hi there - thank you for supporting me in my RfA, which passed 69/10/3 yesterday. I will put the tools to good use and hopefully justify the confidence you had in me. Best wishes Fritzpoll (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

User:Sophiness

Could you please explain why you blocked User:Sophiness

I can only see 2 edits made in the last year, and those are the removal of an odd bit of one article. I don't think this is 'blatant vandalism'.

Also, why is it indefinitely blocked?

--  Chzz  ►  09:23, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Monrose "house music" issue...

Hello again. I wanted to say that I appreciate your directing myself and the OTHER user "Dispute Resolution". However, Noboyo has NOT tried to discuss ANYTHING! I suspect that I will have to take this to the next level. Is that Arbitration? I wouldn't be so upset about it, but I HAVE left messages on the various discussion boards. Also, I created this list for the benefit of people trying to learn about the subject, and his "submission" just isn't factual. Your help is greatly appreciated. (Mirror Ball 13:17, 29 May 2008 (UTC)) Mwmalone

Thank you. I have taken your advice on the Monrose issue

The ball's in his/her court now. (Mirror Ball 13:39, 29 May 2008 (UTC))

Neurology categories

Ah thank you, yes, I did intend for those to be deleted as well. The reason for all these deletes is that they are almost all small typos (lower case 'n' in neurology means it needs to stay, upper case is a typo and needs to be deleted!) thanks :) Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk?_Sign? 17:49, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, that's very helpful :) Feel free to ask if you need anything in return ;) Regards, CycloneNimrod^Talk?_Sign? 17:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)