User talk:Tulsa2185

OU

As a current or past contributor to a related article, I thought I'd let you know about WikiProject University of Oklahoma, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the University of Oklahoma. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks and related articles. Thanks! ↔NMajdan•talk 16:38, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsa, OK

Thanks for your comment on the Tulsa, Oklahoma article. Please consider chipping in on the article's feature nomination. Just put "oppose" or "support" or you can just "comment" too. Either way, we'd love to have your opinion on if the article should be a featured article. Thanks! Okiefromokla•talk 22:17, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The New Adelson Pic

Good one. Tom looks all professional and stuff. I like it. Philippe 03:35, 16 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vision 2025 artice

Thank you very much for creating the Vision 2025 article. Its been a big hole for a long time now and i've always thought it should be created. Any expanding you can do on it would be great as well! Thanks again. Just as a side note, we'd sure like fellow Tulsans like yourself to help out on Taskforce Tulsa articles if you're interested. Thanks! Okiefromokla•talk 04:04, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Texas Rangers articles

Great work on starting Template:2005 Texas Rangers season game log and 2006 Texas Rangers season. Both articles were on my short list of articles to write, but you beat me to it. Would you mind if I helped fill in the data for the game log? (I did the 2006 game log.) Cheers, Caknuck 02:54, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on finishing off the '05 game log. Let me know if/when you plan on starting the 2004 season. Caknuck 08:58, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Please be courteous to other editors and use edit summaries when updating articles. The Mathbot tool shows your usage of edit summaries to be extremely low:

Edit summary usage for Tulsaschoolboard: 26% for major edits and 7% for minor edits. Based on the last 150 major and 150 minor edits in the article namespace.

Using edit summaries helps other editors quickly understand your edits, which is especially useful when you make changes to articles that are on others' watchlists. Thanks and happy editing! --Kralizec! (talk) 16:04, 7 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:CommissionerKimHolland.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:CommissionerKimHolland.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Garion96 (talk) 16:09, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Oklahoma Newsletter October 07

The WikiOkie Reporter

WikiProject Oklahoma's Newsletter
Issue 2 - October 2007

Edit this newsletter
Discuss this newsletter

Your second or third stop for WikiProject Oklahoma News

Modest boost in assessed articles during September

WikiProject Oklahoma's massive list of unassessed articles got smaller over the month of September, as 45 articles were assessed by bots and editors. Assessments made on August 31 bring the total to 62 assessed articles over the 31-day period. On September 15, BetacommandBot assessed 40 articles from no-class to stub and start class. This bot automatically updates the talk pages of articles included in more than one WikiProject if at least one WikiProject has already assessed the material, bringing each interested WikiProject's ratings into compliance with the assessment. No B-class or higher quality assessments were given out over September, and only a small handful of importance assessments were granted. On August 31, one Low, Mid, and High importance rating was given to three separate articles. Leroy McGuirk was given the lone high-importance rating.

Oklahoma categories receive help from Texan

TexasAndroid, an administrator, assisted WikiProject Oklahoma by categorizing nearly 100 Oklahoma-related pages on September 24. The additions were made mainly to Tulsa-related pages. "I've done the major cities in Texas in the past, and was thinking about what to do next, and decided to stay relatively close to home for now. Thus OK's big cities got done," TexasAndroid wrote on his user page.

Shortcut

WP:TULSA

Meet WikiProject Oklahoma's "sub-project"

Taskforce Tulsa, a collaboration of editors operating under WikiProject Oklahoma, has been created to increase the scope of Wikipedia's coverage of Tulsa and its surrounding areas. Taskforce Tulsa is many things, but most importantly, it is a way for editors to have a place to put Tulsa-related requests (pictures, article, expansion, collaboration) for other editors interested in Tulsa. News, guidelines, and category trees related to Tulsa articles can easily be accessed and added through the task force's project page. The taskforce is not its own WikiProject. Instead, it works in conjunction with WikiProject Oklahoma to increase the quality and scope of Tulsa-related material. Because of the increased clutter and unnecessary waste of space that would be created with a new WikiProject, editors have opted for a taskforce, or workgroup project. Rather than having a Wikiproject Oklahoma banner as well as a Wikiproject Tulsa banner on most Tulsa-related pages, editors can simply add the Tulsa Taskforce note onto the existing Wikiproject Oklahoma banner. Cleaner, clearer, and more efficient. In edit mode, such a banner would appear as this: "{{WikiProject Oklahoma|class=FA|importance=Top|tulsa-task-force=yes}}". In other words, simply adding "tulsa-task-force=yes}}" to the existing Wikiproject Oklahoma banner on an article's talk page would include that article into the Tulsa Task Force. According to an explanation on the taskforce's project page, "The Tulsa Task Force is a 'sub-wikiproject' operating 'beneath' Wikiproject Oklahoma, and is designed to assist it by focusing specifically on Tulsa-related material. Editors who are interested in expanding knowledge of Tulsa on Wikipedia may wish to consider themselves part of Taskforce Tulsa as well as Wikiproject Oklahoma." Interested parties can sign up much like a stand-alone WikiProject.

This month's task: Get out of your routine. Make some edits! • Edit next month's newsletter

The WikiProject Oklahoma newsletter is a work in progress so please share your ideas about how the newsletter can be improved.
If you no longer wish to receive this newsletter, please remove your name from the sign-up list.

This newsletter was delivered to you by Okiefromokla. This is a one-time delivery as to all Wikiproject Oklahoma members to boost interest in the newsletter. In the future, if you would like to receive this newsletter in your talk page, please insert your name in the sign-up list. Thanks!

Average Membership

In the article, Booker T. Washington High School, you stated that the average daily attendance is some figure with a decimal point, when, in fact when the high school template says "students", it does not mean aveerage daily attendance, rather the number of students currently enrolled in the school. --Μ79_Šp€çíá∫íš†^{tell me about it} 04:22, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit to CPHS

You recent edit to, Charles Page High School edited a template used throughout wikipedia for high school sports. Just thought you might want to know that those sports are, in fact, considered sports by the ossaa. http://www.ossaa.com/partners/ossaa/sports/index.html --Μ79_Šp€çíá∫íš†^{tell me about it} 04:32, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering...

Hi there. Just a friendly question here. I was wondering where your name comes from. It seems odd unless you are actually on the Tulsa school board. What's the story there? Okiefromokla•talk 02:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, ok. Good enough reason :P Take care. Okiefromokla•talk 21:24, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To me, your username implies that you are the Tulsa School Board. The wikipedia policy on usernames (see WP:Username) is not to mislead someone to believe that you are someone that you are not or an organization. You might want to mail an administrator for a name change. Just a suggestion... --Μ79_Šp€çíá∫íš†^{tell me about it} 21:00, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:OKCSONICS.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:OKCSONICS.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Mangostar (talk) 19:02, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clinton Endorsements

Please stop adding people for whom you have no citations. This isn't supposed to be a rumor mill or campaign literature dumping ground. Flatterworld (talk) 22:57, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prod Notice

Proposed deletion of National Academic Championship

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article National Academic Championship, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. LonelyBeacon (talk) 17:51, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Matthew Mangini

I have nominated Matthew Mangini, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Matthew Mangini. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Wizardman 20:59, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Username concern

I noticed that your username, Tulsaschoolboard, may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because your username implies endorsement by the Tulsa school board as well as operation of this username by a group, both of which are specifically prohibited by the username policy. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may file for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 05:16, 27 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Username blocked

This account, Tulsa2185, has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, because your username does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below).

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive, or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

Please choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. However, do not create a new account if you wish to credit your existing contributions to a new name through a username change. To request a username change:

Add {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to edit this talk page even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a list of names that have already been taken. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 23:29, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to tulsa2185 (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tulsaschoolboard! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Quentin Chaney - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 19:21, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turner Turnpike

Hey, I cited some of the material in the Turner Turnpike section, adding two new sources that could probably be used to expand the article in general. Since you'd made a recent change to the article I thought to might take a look and think about how to better use these two sources I've added. One is the Encyclopedia of Oklahoma History and Culture article on Turnpikes and Toll Bridges. The other is the PIKEPASS website's history page. Okiebradshaw (talk) 20:29, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Qfiesta08.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Qfiesta08.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:2008fiestaonsidekick.JPG missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:2008fiestaonsidekick.JPG

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 04:58, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Austinhallusao.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:38, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:Bedlam2007.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 13:09, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Johnwaldrontulsa.JPG listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Johnwaldrontulsa.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2006 Tulsa, Oklahoma mayoral election for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2006 Tulsa, Oklahoma mayoral election is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayoral elections until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Wow (talk) 20:24, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Whitesands2007snow.jpg

The file File:Whitesands2007snow.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:48, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]