User talk:TrueCrime26

Hello TrueCrime26, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Happy editing! Blooded Edge ^Sign/_Talk 13:43, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Speedy deletion of Roberta Joseph Hayes

A tag has been placed on Roberta Joseph Hayes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Waterden (talk) 15:07, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Peck Park. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. See edit summary: calling me an idiot. The article needs reliable secondary sources to establish notability of the park. You may wish to read some of the links provided above to get more familiar with the guidelines, including the policy on no personal attacks. MuZemike 14:22, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editor assistance

I have requested editor assistance in regards to your removal of maintenance tags without addressing any of the issues as well as personal attacks. See Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests#User:TrueCrime26. Thank you, MuZemike 16:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Del Cerro Park. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not delete maintenance templates as you did. If you are unhappy with such templates, please discuss on the article talk page - that is what is there for. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 17:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page User:MuZemike. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. QueenCake (talk) 20:04, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
If you continue to make personal attacks on other people as you did at User:MuZemike, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. —/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 20:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --Ged UK 07:15, 20 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hot prowl burglary

Hi TrueCrime. The current lower case "Hot prowl burglary" is correct - see WP:STYLE#Article titles, headings, and sections. Also, don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes (~~~~). Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 21:51, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TrueCrime, I should clarify that we sign messages left on talk pages, but we don't sign articles. Thanks, Marasmusine (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Visalia ransacker

A tag has been placed on Visalia ransacker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ipatrol (talk) 01:15, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lacy Park

The article Lacy Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Doesn't appear to be notable

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 16:54, 23 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2003 Van Nuys Courthouse Shooting for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2003 Van Nuys Courthouse Shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2003 Van Nuys Courthouse Shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Gbawden (talk) 11:10, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]