User talk:Tropicalkitty/Archives/2022
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tropicalkitty. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, Tropicalkitty. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
- Done task. Tropicalkitty (talk) 01:44, 4 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, Tropicalkitty. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
- Done task for 2018 ArbCom. Tropicalkitty (talk) 07:55, 3 December 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
August 2022
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
On Geoff Young deletion discussion q
I am establishing i am one and the same editor and the wp:npa of nominator 2A00:1FA0:8BF:7B66:0:49:BBD2:BE01 (talk) 18:20, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, your comment in that deletion discussion wasn’t respectful. Tropicalkitty (talk) 18:32, 31 August 2022 (UTC)
SWViewer warning
Hello there, just so you're aware, you can warn users in SWViewer. You need to press the revert with summary option and enable "Warn user", then press which option applies. Thanks, --Ferien (talk) 09:34, 1 September 2022 (UTC)
Eddie Dempsey
Hi, I saw you reverted use of the hndis template on the Eddie Dempsey disambiguation page. Was this a mistake or is the use of that template wrong for some reason? Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:21, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, it appears I reverted it in error. I thought it was something else, but somehow missed the edit summary on that edit. Tropicalkitty (talk) 08:37, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
Correction on redirect of an article
Hello I want you to move the page of Al Bawaba to MENAFN (World and Middle East business and financial news, Stocks, Currencies,) That's the real name. ✍️Noted (talk) 23:24, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
- The name that it is right now is correct (their website is active), so it shouldn’t be moved. Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:38, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
You are somehow wrong you should search on MENAFN and see for yourself ✍️Noted (talk) 23:49, 5 September 2022 (UTC)
Western House of Refuge
I saw you undid the edits I made expanding the Western House of Refuge page from a stub to a full article. I don't think it was vandalism - am I missing something? EdgertonPark (talk) 01:48, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Hi, sorry for reverting the change you made like that. I fixed the infobox for you (which turned out to be the only issue). Thanks for letting me know. Tropicalkitty (talk) 02:02, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks for fixing the infobox! I'm still getting used to editing on here, so I appreciate all the help I can get. EdgertonPark (talk) 04:39, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Personal information
Hello Tropicalkitty, I have just deleted the user talk page you tagged for deletion; in future, should you see edits such as those, which require suppression, can I please ask you to report them to the oversight team, so that we can oversight them? In this case it's not needed, because I took care of it. Thanks and happy editing. Salvio 22:03, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. I’ll bring it up there if I run into those again. Tropicalkitty (talk) 22:13, 7 September 2022 (UTC)
Hello, can you explain why you revert this edit. Those hatnotes does not meet any proper use of WP:HAT#Examples of proper use. They should be removed. 132.234.229.54 (talk) 01:41, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Restored your revision. Sorry I didn’t notice your comment. Tropicalkitty (talk) 01:46, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
Please fix it
It \may have dodgy info. 121.98.204.148 (talk) 06:10, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- Check the dodgy edit by an aanon editor. 121.98.204.148 (talk) 06:12, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- You did not pick up the disreptancy betweeen the article title and the fiorst paragraph! 121.98.204.148 (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- This is something an anonymous user, or an editor, could have done initially. I reverted because of the comment that was visible in the article. Article space alone is not used for talking for improvements, it's only for encylopedic content. Article talk pages are for that. Tropicalkitty (talk) 06:28, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
- You did not pick up the disreptancy betweeen the article title and the fiorst paragraph! 121.98.204.148 (talk) 06:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Always see you out here doing good, pleasure fighting vandals along side you! Mr.weedle (talk) 00:11, 19 September 2022 (UTC) |
copyvio thanks
Thanks for checking on that EESL article. It looks like that editor was taking press release clippings and throwing that together to beef up the article. I saw a snippet from https://policy.asiapacificenergy.org/node/3649 from their first "Reference". AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 19:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
- You’re welcome. Sorry I didn’t revert it a fourth time, even though it was possibly an exemption under criteria #5. I was leaving it for another individual to handle at the time, in case they saw it (obviously nothing happened though). Tropicalkitty (talk) 23:09, 5 October 2022 (UTC)
October 2022
Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template index/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. click revert with summary and enable "warn user" on SWviewer, which can then warn vandals. Wesoree (Talk) 17:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
I've noticed your name a lot. Great work. Keep it up! :) — Moops ⋠T⋡ 19:32, 21 October 2022 (UTC) |
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Thank you for all your superb work! Fragrant Peony (talk) 19:47, 30 October 2022 (UTC) |
Information
Hello TropicalKitty,
Recently I made some changes in Kharian Cantt Wikipedia. I removed the Educational school which are located in Kharian not Kharian Cantt. I added information about CMH (Combined Military Hospital) which is very famous topic and visited place by Cantonment citizens & non-citizens. I also added information about Parks & Trails where peoples can come and enjoy. All the information was accurate but there are no reference pages available, but if you feel that the information was unnecessary or misleading, you can check the google maps, all the businesses in this area or can either tell me that I made mistake. NMCKHARIAN (talk) 13:08, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Hi NMCKHARIAN, thanks for your comment. I reverted mainly because of 95 that was at the top, and some section header(s) being removed (see Special:Diff/1120943786). Although, parts of the article still contains original research and/or is written like something that’s in a brochure. Tropicalkitty (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- I did no such thing the girls at my science table in my 8th class did it as a joke and put my IP address so they would not get caught doing it so instead i get the charge for it. 165.140.60.7 (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:BROTHER. (i currently cannot confirm nor deny that this IP belongs to a school because Whois is not functioning right now) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ok if you need me to i could tell you my school and they can confirm that i am a student here 165.140.60.7 (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- No please don't. I'm sure this is only temporary. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:10, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- ok if you dont need me to i wont i just want to prove im innocent 165.140.60.7 (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- i am home now so we can talk again 209.128.211.158 (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- blaze you there 209.128.211.158 (talk) 02:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- I have nothing to do with any of this. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- what do you mean? 165.140.60.7 (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- I simply got here because I was watching Tropicalkitty's talk page. If you have an issue then bring it up with them. OTherwsie move along and do something else per WP:NOTAFORUM. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- but how do i prove that i dident do it 165.140.60.7 (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- That's the neat part, you don't. It's impossible and also a waste of time. If you want to edit constructively without being connected to other people who edit on your IP then I suggest you create an account. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- I think we should move on from this particlar topic that the anonymous user is discussing. Although you're comments are appreciated, I don't want this turned into a chatroom. I apologize for not responding earlier because I was away either sleeping or busy with other tasks outside of Wikimedia projects. I have nothing really to say because it has been answered as best as possible. Thanks! Tropicalkitty (talk) 21:11, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- That's the neat part, you don't. It's impossible and also a waste of time. If you want to edit constructively without being connected to other people who edit on your IP then I suggest you create an account. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 19:56, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- but how do i prove that i dident do it 165.140.60.7 (talk) 19:53, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- I simply got here because I was watching Tropicalkitty's talk page. If you have an issue then bring it up with them. OTherwsie move along and do something else per WP:NOTAFORUM. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 14:07, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- what do you mean? 165.140.60.7 (talk) 13:47, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- I have nothing to do with any of this. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 02:51, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- blaze you there 209.128.211.158 (talk) 02:49, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
- i am home now so we can talk again 209.128.211.158 (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- Ok if you need me to i could tell you my school and they can confirm that i am a student here 165.140.60.7 (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- See WP:BROTHER. (i currently cannot confirm nor deny that this IP belongs to a school because Whois is not functioning right now) ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 20:03, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
- I did no such thing the girls at my science table in my 8th class did it as a joke and put my IP address so they would not get caught doing it so instead i get the charge for it. 165.140.60.7 (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
- Completed voting. Thank you Xaosflux for the message. Tropicalkitty (talk) 02:06, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
Cookies!
Cookies! | ||
Melecie has given you some cookies! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the "WikiLove" by giving someone else some cookies, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. nice work in recent changes! have seen you hanging around a couple of times now. happy editing and keep up your work in 2023! 💜 melecie talk - 08:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC) To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookies}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}! |
💜 melecie talk - 08:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you for the message! Tropicalkitty (talk) 08:15, 31 December 2022 (UTC)