User talk:Topcardi

Welcome!

Thank you very much for your recent contributions to various Olympics pages. The 1900 Olympics, as you have been contributing to, are not very high on the priority of most of the other contributors at WP:OLYMPICS and so we often overlook the fact that the early games were very important indeed and need a lot more work, work that you have given. Please take a look at WT:OLYMPICS to get a sense of where the project is going. Currently, we're tagging all pages in the Olympics-jurisdiction with importance and quality tags, so maybe you can help out!

Again, I hope you stay with the project, and if you have any questions, feel free to contact me on my talk page, or the others on WP:OLYMPICS at the project talk page. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐ 21:10, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

1900 Olympics Cricketers

I've noticed that you've been adding various details (middle names, DOBs, etc) to the profiles of the British players at the 1900 Olympics cricket tournament. You've not given any sources for the information, could you possibly add this to the articles please? Thanks. Andrew nixon 21:19, 12 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Saint George Ashe

Could you please give the source for your statement that British rower at the 1900 Olympics Saint George Ashe was born in Malta. This circumstance isn't related in any of the usual sources for early Olympians biographies (e.g. Mallon, de Wael)?

Reply - Ian Buchanan's book "British Olympians" (Guinness-1991) has an entry (birth/death places/dates) for every British gold medallist and also an index of all British competitors (up to 1988) with birthdates only.

Cross referencing with the website http://www.1901censusonline.com comes up with the entry

St George Ashe age 29 - born Malta - London - St Giles In The Fields & St George Bloomsbury (Solicitor).

The 1881 census also confirms this result and nobody with remotely the same name is listed. It's not really "original research", more just marrying print and on-line information together and obviously it won't work with a more common combination of names. Topcardi 13:11, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics WikiProject membership update

The Olympics WikiProject is performing a membership update to check for currently active and idle members.

Because your username appears on the members list, we kindly ask you visit this page and put your name under the appropriate section, using the code #{{user|USERNAME}}, in order to renew or cancel your membership.

The Olympics WikiProject team

Azubuike

I guess you're technically right, but you can see him in this image proudly sporting the Union Jack. I know this is probably going on original research, but it just makes me assume that he probably considers himself to be British as opposed to Nigerian. According to WP:ID, "Use terminology that subjects use for themselves (self-identification) whenever this is possible. Use terms that a person uses for himself or herself, or terms that a group most commonly uses for itself." Bash Kash (talk) 21:12, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Football at the Summer Olympics

Hello! I note that you recently edited the above article in order to say that the IOC accepts the 1900 and 1904 tournaments as official, citing the IOC website as evidence. However, I looked this up on the IOC website, and what it says is that "In 1900 and 1904, football was introduced as an exhibition sport and became the first team sport included in the Olympic Games. Since 1908, the sport has been held at every Olympic Games with the exception of 1932 in Los Angeles". Doesn't this mean that football was not an official tournament at the 1900 and 1904 olympics, but rather an exhibition sport, and the first full tournament was in 1908? To be honest, I am not really fully conversant with what one would actually call an "official tournament" at the Olympics, and whether exhibition status counts in this regard; however, surely it needs to be noted that the IOC considers these events exhibitions in distinction to the tournaments that have been held since 1908? Robotforaday (talk) 00:02, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for the explanation about what is clearly a confusing picture! Robotforaday (talk) 02:49, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Waldstein, Charles Waldstein (archaeologist), Charles Waldstein (shooter)

Hello, thank you for finding and referencing the article which confirms that the archaeologist and shooter are the same person. Perhaps the contents should now be moved to the disambiguation page Charles Waldstein since there seems to be only one person with that name on Wikipedia, and Charles Waldstein (archaeologist) and Charles Waldstein (shooter) should be converted into disambiguation pages - are there any other talents of this polymath which are waiting to be discovered? Defrosted (talk) 23:44, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kolehmainen and Wolf

Thanks for the info, I appreciate it! Cheers, CP 04:05, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Egan

I found his real name from the newspapers of this era. I encountered this first in this The New York Times article (click to View Full Article, the second paragraph of the article). Him boxing under pseudonym was quite an hot news back in 1905, you can get more hits of this when searching the Library of Congress Historical Newspapers Archive (insert Jack Egan under exact phrase).

NB! His pseudonym was Jack Egan, not Jack Eagan. Gh (talk) 14:04, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Keeping & Mike Keeping

Thanks for the note - sorry if I've been slow in responding, but I have been away for a few days.

I'm afraid I can't shed any light on the relationship between Frank and Mike, although the chronology appears to fit, as Mike was born in Milford-on-Sea in 1902. My reference books merely say about Mike what I put in the article when I expanded it last September. I've had a look elsewhere, but have drawn a blank.

Perhaps when you have finished your research, you could expand the article on Frank, and include a query on the two talk pages regarding their probable relationship. Sorry I can't be of more help. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 06:07, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of heavyweight boxing champions

Hello Topcardi,

I am very interested in the article List of heavyweight boxing champions. I notice you have edited this particular article frequently in the past.

I am especially interested in two of your edits:

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_heavyweight_boxing_champions&diff=next&oldid=183069590

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_heavyweight_boxing_champions&diff=next&oldid=183080150

Both concern the NBA/EBU/NYSAC and who they recognised as their world heavyweight champions.

It appears that the conclusion you have come to with your first edit is that:

(a) between June 22, 1949-September 27, 1950, Ezzard Charles was the NBA champion; (b) between September 27, 1950-June 16, 1951, he was now also the NYSAC champion (as well as the NBA champion); (c) between June 16, 1951-July 18, 1951, he was now also the EBU champion (and ultimately, the universal champion, as he held all three belts); (d) Lee Savold was the EBU champion between June 6, 1950-June 16, 1951.

Here are my thoughts on the above:

(a) cannot be disputed.

(b) bearing in mind that September 27, 1950 was the date that Charles defeated Joe Lewis, the fact that he held just two of the three world heavyweight title belts in this particular time period is directly contradicted by the paragraph below which states:

"Charles won the vacant National Boxing Association championship, but was not universally recognized as champion until defeating Joe Louis, the former champion who had come out of retirement."

According to the profile of Ezzard Charles on boxrec.com, it states that following his victory over Lewis on September 27, 1950, "Charles became universally recognized as the World Heavyweight Champion."

Surely he would have to gain recognition from all three organizations in order to become the universal champion, not just two?

(c) cannot be disputed.

(d) according to Lee Savold's profile on boxrec.com, the world heavyweight title that he won on June 6, 1950 was "Recognized only by the British Boxing Board of Control" and it was this which passed over to Ezzard Charles on June 16, 1951 (specifically June 15, 1951) when Savold lost to Joe Lewis.

So I guess the questions I would like to ask your are:

(a) who did the EBU recognize as their world heavyweight champion between September 27, 1950 and June 15/16, 1951?

(b) If indeed the answer is Charles, was the EBU title (like the NYSAC title) left vacant from Joe Lewis' retirement on March 1, 1949 all the way through to September 27, 1950?

Regarding your second edit:

I notice that you have stated that Muhammad Ali was stripped of his NYSAC title on April 29, 1967 when he refused to be inducted into the US Army. You have then stated that Joe Frazier won this title in March 4, 1968.

I was wondering, therefore, if you knew who the NYSAC recognised as their world champion between June 19, 1964-February 6, 1967 because the only belts that appear to have been accounted for in this article between those dates (when Ali was no longer recognized by the WBA for agreeing to an immediate rematch with Sonny Liston) are the WBC title (Muhammad Ali) and the WBA title (Ernie Terrell, from March 5, 1965).

It mentions in the article that "The WBC and other organizations continued to recognize him" but did not specify whether the NYSAC were one of these organizations.

Kind regards,

Standingfish.

Standingfish (talk) 14:39, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

List of heavyweight boxing champions

Hello again,

Thanks very much for responding to my message so quickly and in such detail. It is very much appreciated.

I've just edited List of heavyweight boxing champions to incorporate some of the things that we spoke about. I wasn't logged in at the time though so it won't recognize the edit as being from Standingfish.

Take a look at the edit I made and feel free to change anything that is inaccurate.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=List_of_heavyweight_boxing_champions&diff=230326782&oldid=228714772

I have a few further questions:

1) I changed a paragraph which read: "Savold lost the recognition he had as "world" champion in Europe and the British Commonwealth when he lost to Joe Louis in a non-title fight in June 1951."

By Europe, I presume the person who wrote this sentence was referring to the EBU and the area that the EBU covers. By the British Commonwealth, I wasn't sure if they were referring to the BBBofC (and the area it covers) or the British Commonwealth as a specific boxing organization (and the area it covers). I understand that there is a Commonwealth (British Empire) world heavyweight championship and I presume there's a governing body behind that particular championship. If so, was the person referring to that particular boxing organization as the one that awarded the recognition, the BBBofC or perhaps someone different completely?

2) I decided not to edit this, but here goes: There is a sentence which reads: "In late 1934 the International Boxing Union ordered world champion Max Baer to defend his title against the reigning European champion, Pierre Charles of Belgium."

According to boxrec.com, Pierre Charles was not the reigning European Champion in late 1934 - that's assuming it is the EBU (European) heavyweight title to which it is being referred. He lost to Paulino Uzcudun on May 13, 1933 to relinquish the title and didn't regain it until June 21, 1935 when he beat Vincenz Hower.

3) In the article, there is a line which reads: "Schmeling defeated Jack Sharkey to earn universal recognition as champion". I was particularly interested in the word 'universal' and presumed he may not have been recognized by all the organizations prior to his victory over Sharkey. I then started looking at the profiles on boxrec.com of Joe Louis, Max Schmeling, Jack Dempsey and Gene Tunney. For some fights, these legends are not listed as being the world heavyweight champion despite being listed as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion and vice versa. There are also funny combinations of holding only one of the NBA/NYSAC titles (but not the other) at the same time as being world heavyweight champion. There is even one instance when Dempsey was the NYSAC champion but not the NBA champion or the world heavyweight champion. What do you make of this?

Here are the boxrec.com profiles I was referring to:

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=9027&cat=boxer

1937-06-22 - Louis was recognized as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion but not as the world heavyweight champion. 1937-08-30/1938-02-23/1938-04-01 - Louis was recognized as the world heavyweight champion but not as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion. 1938-06-22 - Louis was recognized as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion and the world heavyweight champion. 1939-01-25 onwards - Louis was recognized as the world heavyweight champion but not as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=9041&cat=boxer

1930-06-12 Schmeling was recognized as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion but not as the world heavyweight champion. 1931-07-03 Schmeling was recognized as the NBA world heavyweight champion and the world heavyweight champion but not as the NYSAC world heavyweight champion. 1932-06-21 Jack Sharkey was recognized as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion but not as the world heavyweight champion. 1938-06-22 (as mentioned above also) Joe Louis was recognized as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion and the world heavyweight champion.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=9009&cat=boxer

1917-07-04/1920-09-06/1920-12-14 Dempsey was recognized as the world heavyweight champion but not as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion. 1921-07-02 Dempsey was recognized as the NBA world heavyweight champion and the world heavyweight champion but not as the NYSAC world heavyweight champion. 1922-07-24 Dempsey was recognized as the NYSAC world heavyweight champion but not as the world heavyweight champion or the NBA world heavyweight champion. 1923-07-04 Dempsey was recognized as the world heavyweight champion but not as the NBA/NYSAC world heavyweight champion. 1923-09-14 Dempsey was recognized as the world heavyweight champion and the NYSAC world heavyweight champion but not as the NBA world heavyweight champion. 1926-09-23/1927-09-22 Gene Tunney was recognized as the world heavyweight champion and the NBA world heavyweight champion but not as the NYSAC world heavyweight champion.

http://www.boxrec.com/list_bouts.php?human_id=9046&cat=boxer

1926-09-23 (as mentioned above also)/1927-09-22(as mentioned above also)/1928-07-26 Gene Tunney was recognized as the world heavyweight champion and the NBA world heavyweight champion but not as the NYSAC world heavyweight champion.

Thanks very much for all your help,

Kind regards,

Standingfish.

Standingfish (talk) 05:19, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 07:46, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wilf Waller

Ouch! Thanks for that - that shows what you get for believing The Independent! It's a bit late now to pull it off the front page, but I guess we should at least add your "research" to the article's talk page. Cheers. --Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 15:32, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have taken the liberty of pasting your note to me onto the article's talk page - let me know if you have any objections. Thanks for bringing this to my atention. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 17:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Hassay

I note you added that Jordan Hassay was a British American. Since she is native born, there is no statement that she is. Could you please explain and reference this addition.Trackinfo (talk) 07:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright warning

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Your edit here introduced a copyright violation from this and this. Close paraphrasing is still considered a copyright violation. Please be more careful in future. Strange Passerby (talk • c • status) 04:22, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

England & Wales, Birth/Death Indexes

Hi Topcardi, just following up on the useful Birth/Death information you've recently added to some articles that I've contributed to. Is this information available online? As I'd also like to add this type of information to other articles. Cheers. DynamoDegsy (talk) 11:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, I'll check out FreeBMD. Cheers. DynamoDegsy (talk) 12:31, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article Bob Hardisty, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Giant Snowman 22:05, 24 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Olympic sports

Re Motorsports they have been part of the Olympics in the early days (like Tug-of-War) see for 1908 Category:Water motorsports at the Olympics Hugo999 (talk) 07:21, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Times, Badminton

You added recently results of the All England 1912. Can you access these old issues of The Times? I would need more results of the finals, and also the finalists from 1913 to 1937. Best --Florentyna (talk) 07:15, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oleg Maskaev

He's Russian, it says he's Russian on boxrec and everyone only has 1 flag next to their name. He associates himself as a Russian therefore, he has that flag next to his name. He wasn't even that great or special of a fighter to begin with but he DEFINITELY didn't do anything in his career that warrants him being the ONLY fighter on that list to have 2 flags next to his name... Wladimir Klitschko was born in Kazakhstan yet he has a Ukrainian flag next to his name because that's how he wants to be identified. Unless you're in close contact with Maskaev and can prove that he wants the American flag next to his name, then he's only getting the Russian flag. Someone else tried to pull this bullshit with John Ruiz at 1 point due to the whole Puerto Rican ancestry thing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.235.111.193 (talk) 11:59, 11 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UCI WT

Do you have a source that says that the UCI have reallocated points from last year's world tour? If so, this change is a good spot: if not, it appears to be OR. Kevin McE (talk) 10:27, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks: that UCI site is very poor for negotiating around, and I couldn't find it. Kevin McE (talk) 11:09, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Triangle Orthopaedic Associates

The article Triangle Orthopaedic Associates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is based on basic notability guidelines. After searching online I was unable to find any notable resources regarding this health care association. Despite a few doctors who have said they have worked for the company. I believe this fails WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sarah (talk) 02:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Triangle Orthopaedic Associates

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Triangle Orthopaedic Associates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sarah (talk) 02:26, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Olympics PED article

Thank you so much for your excellent addition to the Olympics performance enhancing drugs article. I struggled with how to tell the difference for readers, but you nailed it in one. I'm still awaiting the five positive tests on medalists from Athens that were due to come out this week...Gareth E Kegg (talk) 00:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fred Robson

Please see discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Golf#Fred Robson: Welsh or English.3F.Nigej 10:30, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Doping at the Olympic Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ARD (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Katharine Maltwood

The analysis in Wikipedia: Magna Mater (1911) was Maltwood’s first publicly recognized work. It was designed as a triptych. The central individual is crouched with his arms bound together. His position resonates with despair and struggle. The man’s strong legs and arms connote that he is a labourer. On either side of the labourer, mounds of people are bound together along a rope. The quote is taken from Sirach 40 or the Ecclesiasticus, which states, “Great travail is created for every man, and an heavy yoke is upon the sons of Adam, from the day that they go out of their mother's womb, till the day that they return to the mother of all things.”

The analysis in Katharine Maltwood's site in the University of Victoria site: http://www.maltwood.uvic.ca/k_maltwood/maltwoods/magnamater.html

I checked the editing done on this article. The analysis was written like this from the beginning. It's strange that the original author used the Maltwood site as his/her main source and yet wrote the description of Magna Mater from a different source or maybe even his own head. Can you change it, write the correct analysis? Thanks.

If you want to write me back, I have an account on FanFiction.net, FictionPress.com, and DeviantArt.com. In all three I'm called Ineharnia

199.203.62.53 (talk) 10:57, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Lesotho records in athletics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bambous (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:14, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1998 Tour de France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrea Tafi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:33, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meldonium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WADA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Meldonium, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sergey Semenov. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jemmy Grimshaw

Just seen your comment on my talkpage from last year about Jemmy Grimshaw. Yes, I think we can use those refs to assume he is the fella. Well spotted! I've searched for details about him in several places before, and I think there may have been other Grimshaws at different times. I've found it hard to pin it down definitively to one name or the other, but those refs seem pretty conclusive. Thanks. Do you want to update or should I? Peaky76 (talk) 21:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Topcardi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Citation needed for changes to 2007 World Championships in Athletics – Women's triple jump

Could you please provide a citation for your 19 August 2017 edit of 2007_World_Championships_in_Athletics_–_Women's_triple_jump? Notably, your edit conflicts with the data presently listed on the IAAF website, which lists Anna Pyatykh in 3rd place and not disqualified. Thanks. — BrianKrent (talk) 08:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

datasheets.tips

Hi Topcardi. I was hoping you might recall details of the now dead website, datasheets.tip. You used in as a reference here, which I changed yesterday to the original IOC document [1]. It looks like datasheets.tips was using a number of strategies to get links included in Wikipedia. My guess is they were shutdown for copyright violations. --Ronz (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

olympic bobsleigh

That is an interesting suggestion. If true it would marginally affect the tables (helping Nigeria) but would have no bearing on the inaccurate claims of them being actually qualified. It may help explain why the Czech Republic was able to compete in 2014, the problem with that example is that they never produced a document stating how countries qualified and there was one more event affecting rankings after the final relevant competition. And seems to be in conflict with the qualification for skeleton in 2014, but the IBSF never really explained why the field was not filled there. Also why wasn't Lee Webster included in 2014? If he choose not to complete (or his NOC), why was he at least not hailed as the first African qualifier in skeleton?18abruce (talk) 22:12, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think South Africa have/had a policy in place before the qualification that they were not going to accept continental qualification? See the women's rugby team in Rio and hockey teams. Topcardi (talk) 22:33, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's true, however unless the "cleaned up list" you speak of was not in use previously, it is very odd that an african (the first one!) would qualify for the olympics and not be mentioned.18abruce (talk) 22:46, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't been able to confirm if the system has specifically been changed for 2018 Topcardi (talk) 22:49, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all the communication, really want to get it right. It is difficult because there is nothing that can really be sourced that indicates a modified ranking list, and the rules give no hint of this. I can see from what you are saying that an eligible competitor from Africa or Oceania (in women's bobsled) would be as good as qualified because if you remove entries from nations that have more than three sleds you are left with less than 35 total. In that light though it makes it kind of bizarre that they would even have a rule for the top 40 when that would only make 35 total sleds last year. We should likely do something to the qualification lists for bobsled and skeleton, but need to find a way of not using weasel words.18abruce (talk) 02:34, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Like I've said before - I've never seen this confirmed on paper. Just that I've been in contact with people who apparently have seen the full facts Topcardi (talk) 02:47, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found the relevent rule here (4.1 pg 9). Will be very important for the skeleton competitions I think.18abruce (talk) 13:31, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

2014 bobsleigh

I think the sleds are disqualified, I am confident that disqualifying the driver is the same as disqualifying the sled.18abruce (talk) 19:14, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would hope so but in the case of the Russian speed skater who competed in the team pursuit it was clear that the team was also disqualified. In Zubkov's case no decision about the bob team was mentioned Topcardi (talk) 20:56, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see the problem, it is also a bit troubling that the IBSF has released no press release yet as they did (promptly) with the skeleton athletes.18abruce (talk) 22:10, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problem solved https://stillmed.olympic.org/media/Document%20Library/OlympicOrg/IOC/Who-We-Are/Commissions/Disciplinary-Commission/2017/SML-023-Disciplinary-Commission-Decision-Operative-Part-Dmitrii-TRUNENKOV.pdf Topcardi (talk) 18:31, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Topcardi. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rowing at the 1930 British Empire Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Justin Brown (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

References

Please use Citeweb/Citenews when putting in references instead of Bare URL's. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:25, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Topcardi. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfD comment

Hi Topcardi. Following on from this, do you have a source for it? Would be handy for the tri-series article. No worries if you don't. Thanks. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 20:34, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help and the info on SR too. Much appreicated. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 19:47, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Cecil" Pryce Harrison

Hello, I'm curious to know where this "Cecil" comes from? I've checked numerous sources, and they all list him simply as "Pryce Harrison", namely the old "teamdan" website [2], Motorsport magazine: [3], The Motor Miscellany: [4] and David Hodge's book "The French Grand Prix".A7V2 (talk) 00:21, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I negelected to mention that I'm refering to you recent edit to 1907 French Grand Prix. A7V2 (talk) 00:22, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've reverted your edit for now. If you think I'm wrong, by all means make your edit again but please provide a reference. (Also I'm unwatching your talk page so I may not see a response if you make it here).A7V2 (talk) 02:25, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

sports-reference.com

I saw you might have some connection to this website, is that accurate? I'd like to report a problem with how things are configured there, that is impacting our archive bots. -- GreenC 17:32, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What's the problem? Topcardi (talk) 21:34, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Short version: all of the dead links redirect to the same page which returns a status 200. As a result the InternetArchiveBot (which runs on 30+ language wikis) does not detect the links are dead and does not add an archive URL. Thus we have millions of Olympics links that are dead across dozens of wikis and not effective tool to fix them.

Long version: IABot can mark entire domains dead in its database, but it can not mark partial like in this case where many sports-reference.com URLs are still live under a different non-Olympics path. However IABot has the ability to mark each individual URL as dead, but then a new problem arises: IABot has a feature if a user ever reverts a bot edit, on any wiki for any reason, it takes this as a signal to mean the entire domain is live and resets all individual URLs in its database to a live state (again, IABot sees things only on a domain level not domain/path level). So we can't mark the URLs as dead in the IABot database. And the sports-reference.com site is not signaling the URLs are dead, either.

In the mean time we have millions of dead links. It could most easily be solved if sports-reference.com would signal the links are 404. If that is done, we can set IABot loose and it will being loading Wikipedia with archives of the links. Even if it were only done for some period of time, long enough to get the job done. -- GreenC 01:46, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Message has been passed on to those who can do something about it. Topcardi (talk) 08:52, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

November 2020

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Rhys Norrington-Davies article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doping at the Olympic Games, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page EPO. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 22

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of WBU world champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mark Hobson.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 22 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of WBU world champions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frank Tate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 30 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of WBU world champions, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daniel Santos and Thomas Tate.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

WiciBrosiect Cymru

Ymunwch gyda WiciBrosiect Cymru os gwelwch yn dda! Diolch Titus Gold (talk) 21:38, 28 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zharnel Hughes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

Hi there - Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify information, especially about living people. You didn't provide a source for your changes to the Jay Dasilva article, but I have found one and added it for you. Please try and remember to include sources yourself with future edits. Please let me know if you have any questions. Giant Snowman 18:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]