User talk:Tony theprof

Welcome!

Hello, Tony theprof, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! KillerChihuahua^?!? 14:04, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dikran Tahta

Just wanted to give you a heads up. I moved "dick tahta" to Dikran Tahta and then created a redirect from Dick Tahta to Dikran Tahta. The way you created the title was an incorrect format. Quotations are completely unneeded. Typically, an article is under the person's given name, thus the name change. Either search will yield the mathmatician, though. Article still needs some clean-up. I'll see what I can do. Turlo Lomon 09:15, 7 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, first article so learning curve. I wanted to fit links and crosslink in later to other Wiki areas, e.g. Hawkings, Armenia, Armenian Genocide.

Triquetra

What was "known to numismatists as a triquetra" in 1865 is actually called a Triskelion today, and most of the content you added to article Triquetra was not relevant to article Triquetra. AnonMoos 11:50, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Witch Craze

See Talk:Witch Craze. Please discuss articles on the talk (Discussion) page, not the article page, and remember to sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~) and edit summaries. Thanks - KillerChihuahua^?!? 14:02, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dolmens

You're welcome. Man vyi 16:39, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Photos

Nobody would believe I was so keen on tidying up if they looked at my desk! Don't forget that you might find photos for your articles in Commons:Category:Jersey. Man vyi 16:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Toning down

I agree. Best to stick to encyclopaedic facts - if people want polemic, there's plenty out there! Man vyi 14:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made to Christian Wicca

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Tony theprof! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \bmembers\.aol\.com\/.+, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 21:52, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lelitia Landon

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Lelitia Landon, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Addhoc 20:04, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There is a fuller article that I have found since, so mine ought to be deleted please. --TonyinJersey 15:29, 18 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Darius J Pearce

In view of the excellent job you did in sorting out the overtly and covertly partisan editing war on the Jersey Democratic Alliance page, I think you would be the perfect neutral to sort the grain - if any - from the chaff on this page, and make sure that if it is not deleted for non-notability, at least the facts are verified. Please could you have a look?

Daverotherham 15:18, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A number of changes seem to have been made; I have made a few adjusments documented in the discussion area.

--TonyinJersey 07:25, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your attention

Daverotherham 14:32, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Christian Wicca

FYI: Christian Wicca was recently nominated for deletion due to lack of references. I notice that there once were references (many added by you) but it looks like an overzealous revert in March of this year blew many of them away. I thought you should know so that you could put back whatever needs putting back. Hope this helps. Crypticfirefly 05:42, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jersey Politics issues

Looking for some informed comment on:

Wikipedia:Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_3#.5B.5B:Darius_J_Pearce.5D.5D

and

Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Daverotherham

Stuart Syvret

Hi Tony, I am about to do a major expansion of this article, a quick check over would be most appreciated. Thanks.

Was bored also did Frank Walker (Jersey politician)

RichardColgate 01:06, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Philip_Ozouf_Jr RichardColgate 19:54, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio

Please don't restore copyright-infringing material to an article, as you did at Grouville Church. Deor (talk) 17:48, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Tony theprof! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 1 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Alastair Layzell - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Using the JEP as a 'reliable source' with regard to Walker

I have started a discussion on the talk page of Frank Walker on this subject, as a regular contributor, I wondered if you had any thoughts. RichardColgate (talk) 22:45, 1 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Hill (Jersey politician)

Please contribute to the debate on proposed deletion for non-notability of the new article on ex-Deputy Bob Hill Bob Hill (Jersey politician) Andrew Le Sueur (talk)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of William George Tabb

Hello Tony theprof,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged William George Tabb for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 14:39, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of William George Tabb for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William George Tabb is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William George Tabb until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:03, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tony theprof. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tony theprof. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Council of Ministers (Jersey), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Judy Martin and Edward Noel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tony theprof. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Doniago. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, The Horse and His Boy, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 16:47, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]