User talk:Tony Tan/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions with User:Tony Tan. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
إحصائيات
ملاحظات :
تم احتساب أقل حد أدنى للأقسام التى من نفس التخصص.
تم احتساب الحد الأدنى للنظام القديم فقط للثانوية العامة المصرية لجميع الأعوام.
تم تقريب النسبة المئوية لأقرب عدد صحيح.[1]
الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى :
هندسة
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | عام |
83 | 90 | 90 | 91 | 89 | 50 | 86 | 85 | 91 | 84 | 80 | 80 | % |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
حاسبات ومعلومات
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | عام |
68 | 79 | 84 | 84 | 80 | 50 | 71 | 73 | 81 | 80 | 76 | 75 | % |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
إعلام
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | عام |
62 | 61 | 75 | 70 | 69 | 50 | 50 | % |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
تجارة
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | عام |
50 | 54 | 73 | 69 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 61 | 50 | 50 | 55 | 50 | % |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى :
إعلام
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | عام |
50 | 55 | 59 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 50 | % |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
تجارة
2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | عام |
50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 62 | 50 | 55 | 57 | % |
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
ملاحظات
- تم احتساب أقل حد أدنى للأقسام التى من نفس التخصص.
- تم احتساب الحد الأدنى للنظام القديم فقط للثانوية العامة المصرية لجميع الأعوام.
- تم احتساب الحد الأدنى 205 من 410 للتخصصات الغير موجودة بجداول التنسيق.
الجداول
الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى :
هندسة :
المتوسط | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | المنشأة التعليمية |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
95 | 95 | 95 | 97 | 97 | 97 | 91 | 95 | 93 | 95 | 95 | 95 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
95 | 94 | 94 | 96 | 97 | 96 | 90 | 95 | 93 | 95 | 95 | 95 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
84 | 83 | 90 | 90 | 91 | 89 | 50 | 86 | 85 | 91 | 84 | 80 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
71 | 80 | 89 | 87 | 87 | 82 | 50 | 67 | 70 | 68 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
67 | 84 | 84 | 81 | 86 | 80 | 50 | 69 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
72 | 85 | 88 | 88 | 87 | 84 | 50 | 78 | 79 | 50 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
حاسبات ومعلومات :
المتوسط | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | المنشأة التعليمية |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
92 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 87 | 93 | 90 | 93 | 92 | 92 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
92 | 92 | 93 | 94 | 94 | 94 | 86 | 93 | 90 | 94 | 93 | 93 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
75 | 68 | 79 | 84 | 84 | 80 | 50 | 71 | 73 | 81 | 80 | 76 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
61 | 65 | 79 | 75 | 78 | 73 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
60 | 65 | 73 | 76 | 78 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
62 | 65 | 77 | 80 | 81 | 79 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
تجارة :
المتوسط | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | المنشأة التعليمية |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
86 | 86 | 84 | 87 | 89 | 87 | 75 | 88 | 87 | 89 | 89 | 88 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
86 | 84 | 84 | 89 | 88 | 87 | 75 | 88 | 87 | 90 | 89 | 89 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
58 | 50 | 54 | 73 | 69 | 71 | 50 | 50 | 61 | 50 | 50 | 55 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
51 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 50 | 56 | 57 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
57 | 50 | 56 | 67 | 69 | 64 | 50 | 50 | 73 | 50 | 50 | 50 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
61 | 50 | 66 | 76 | 59 | 53 | 50 | 50 | 69 | 70 | 68 | 55 | تصغير|70بك|مركز |
المخططات
الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى :
هندسة :
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
حاسبات ومعلومات :
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
تجارة :
Graphs are unavailable due to technical issues. Updates on reimplementing the Graph extension, which will be known as the Chart extension, can be found on Phabricator and on MediaWiki.org. |
أنظر ايضاً
مكتب تنسيق القبول في الجامعات المصرية
المراجع
- ^ نتائج تنسيق الكليات والمعاهد المصرية من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2015 حديث من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":5" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2015 قديم من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":4" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2014 حديث من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":7" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2014 قديم من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":6" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2013 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":8" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2012 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":9" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2011 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":10" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2010 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":11" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f g الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2009 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":12" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c d e f الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2008 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":13" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b c الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2007 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b c الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2006 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b c الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2005 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b c d e f الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2004 من موقع أرشيف Cite error: The named reference ":1" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2015 حديث من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2015 قديم من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2014 حديث من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2014 قديم من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2013 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2012 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2011 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2010 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2009 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2008 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2007 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2006 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2005 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية أدبى للقبول عام 2004 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ نتائج تنسيق الكليات والمعاهد المصرية من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b c الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2007 من موقع أرشيف
- ^ a b c الحد الأدنى للثانوية العامة المصرية علمى للقبول عام 2006 من موقع أرشيف
تصنيف:التعليم في القاهرة
تصنيف:التعليم في محافظة القاهرة
تصنيف:جامعات مصر
like this
--Mohamed1900q (talk) 00:54, 2 July 2016 (UTC)
A message from 146.200.17.248
146.200.17.248 (talk) 17:35, 25 July 2016 (UTC) why did you revert my edit you jerk?
LEAVE MY EDITS ALONE YOU JERK
Deem
Who are you? I, King Deemer, deem you to be unworthy. You are deemed Tantony. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.30.65.92 (talk) 18:06, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
New Page Review newsletter November 2019
Hello Tony Tan,
This newsletter comes a little earlier than usual because the backlog is rising again and the holidays are coming very soon.
- Getting the queue to 0
There are now 823 holders of the New Page Reviewer flag! Most of you requested the user right to be able to do something about the huge backlog but it's still roughly less than 10% doing 90% of the work. Now it's time for action.
Exactly one year ago there were 'only' 3,650 unreviewed articles, now we will soon be approaching 7,000 despite the growing number of requests for the NPR user right. If each reviewer soon does only 2 reviews a day over five days, the backlog will be down to zero and the daily input can then be processed by every reviewer doing only 1 review every 2 days - that's only a few minutes work on the bus on the way to the office or to class! Let's get this over and done with in time to relax for the holidays.
Want to join? Consider adding the NPP Pledge userbox.
Our next newsletter will announce the winners of some really cool awards.
- Coordinator
Admin Barkeep49 has been officially invested as NPP/NPR coordinator by a unanimous consensus of the community. This is a complex role and he will need all the help he can get from other experienced reviewers.
- This month's refresher course
Paid editing is still causing headaches for even our most experienced reviewers: This official Wikipedia article will be an eye-opener to anyone who joined Wikipedia or obtained the NPR right since 2015. See The Hallmarks to know exactly what to look for and take time to examine all the sources.
- Tools
- It is now possible to select new pages by date range. This was requested by reviewers who want to patrol from the middle of the list.
- It is now also possible for accredited reviewers to put any article back into the New Pages Feed for re-review. The link is under 'Tools' in the side bar.
- Reviewer Feedback
Would you like feedback on your reviews? Are you an experienced reviewer who can give feedback to other reviewers? If so there are two new feedback pilot programs. New Reviewer mentorship will match newer reviewers with an experienced reviewer with a new reviewer. The other program will be an occasional peer review cohort for moderate or experienced reviewers to give feedback to each other. The first cohort will launch November 13.
- Second set of eyes
- Not only are New Page Reviewers the guardians of quality of new articles, they are also in a position to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged for deletion and maintenance and that new authors are not being bitten. This is an important feature of your work, especially while some routine tagging for deletion can still be carried out by non NPR holders and inexperienced users. Read about it at the Monitoring the system section in the tutorial. If you come across such editors doing good work, don't hesitate to encourage them to apply for NPR.
- Do be sure to have our talk page on your watchlist. There are often items that require reviewers' special attention, such as to watch out for pages by known socks or disruptive editors, technical issues and new developments, and of course to provide advice for other reviewers.
- Arbitration Committee
The annual ArbCom election will be coming up soon. All eligible users will be invited to vote. While not directly concerned with NPR, Arbcom cases often lead back to notability and deletion issues and/or actions by holders of advanced user rights.
- Community Wish list
There is to be no wish list for WMF encyclopedias this year. We thank Community Tech for their hard work addressing our long list of requirements which somewhat overwhelmed them last year, and we look forward to a successful completion.
To opt-out of future mailings, you can remove yourself here
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
New Page Review newsletter December 2019
- Reviewer of the Year
This year's Reviewer of the Year is Rosguill. Having gotten the reviewer PERM in August 2018, they have been a regular reviewer of articles and redirects, been an active participant in the NPP community, and has been the driving force for the emerging NPP Source Guide that will help reviewers better evaluate sourcing and notability in many countries for which it has historically been difficult.
Special commendation again goes to Onel5969 who ends the year as one of our most prolific reviewers for the second consecutive year. Thanks also to Boleyn and JTtheOG who have been in the top 5 for the last two years as well.
Several newer editors have done a lot of work with CAPTAIN MEDUSA and DannyS712 (who has also written bots which have patrolled thousands of redirects) being new reviewers since this time last year.
Thanks to them and to everyone reading this who has participated in New Page Patrol this year.
Rank | Username | Num reviews | Log |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rosguill (talk) | 47,395 | Patrol Page Curation |
2 | Onel5969 (talk) | 41,883 | Patrol Page Curation |
3 | JTtheOG (talk) | 11,493 | Patrol Page Curation |
4 | Arthistorian1977 (talk) | 5,562 | Patrol Page Curation |
5 | DannyS712 (talk) | 4,866 | Patrol Page Curation |
6 | CAPTAIN MEDUSA (talk) | 3,995 | Patrol Page Curation |
7 | DragonflySixtyseven (talk) | 3,812 | Patrol Page Curation |
8 | Boleyn (talk) | 3,655 | Patrol Page Curation |
9 | Ymblanter (talk) | 3,553 | Patrol Page Curation |
10 | Cwmhiraeth (talk) | 3,522 | Patrol Page Curation |
(The top 100 reviewers of the year can be found here)
- Redirect autopatrol
A recent Request for Comment on creating a new redirect autopatrol pseduo-permission was closed early. New Page Reviewers are now able to nominate editors who have an established track record creating uncontroversial redirects. At the individual discretion of any administrator or after 24 hours and a consensus of at least 3 New Page Reviewers an editor may be added to a list of users whose redirects will be patrolled automatically by DannyS712 bot III.
- Source Guide Discussion
Set to launch early in the new year is our first New Page Patrol Source Guide discussion. These discussions are designed to solicit input on sources in places and topic areas that might otherwise be harder for reviewers to evaluate. The hope is that this will allow us to improve the accuracy of our patrols for articles using these sources (and/or give us places to perform a WP:BEFORE prior to nominating for deletion). Please watch the New Page Patrol talk page for more information.
- This month's refresher course
While New Page Reviewers are an experienced set of editors, we all benefit from an occasional review. This month consider refreshing yourself on Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features). Also consider how we can take the time for quality in this area. For instance, sources to verify human settlements, which are presumed notable, can often be found in seconds. This lets us avoid the (ugly) 'Needs more refs' tag.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:11, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
NPP message
Hi Tony Tan,
- Invitation
For those who may have missed it in our last newsletter, here's a quick reminder to see the letter we have drafted, and if you support it, do please go ahead and sign it. If you already signed, thanks. Also, if you haven't noticed, the backlog has been trending up lately; all reviews are greatly appreciated.
To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 20 August 2022 (UTC)